Man I remember back in middle school my friend showing me these forum posts making fun of this guy. Now this, this is something else
life really set up this person to fail from day one not trying to take any responsibility from them though
chris chan is a good case study in the endless capacity of psychologically normal "moral" people to justify high school bullying behaviour as anything other than what it obviously is. the amoral trolls who interfere in chris' life directly are less odious than the middle class homebodies writing long articles detailing all of a severely disabled man's "moral failings" in a victorian tone of self-righteous disapproval (oh dear, the man with the alien neurobiology said something taboo and socially inappropriate, how dreadful!). what i find particularly amusing is the repeated refrain "i used to sympathise with chris, but he has never gotten better despite all the advice we've given" as if the unqualified platitudes of random internet rtards constitute some kind of legitimate therapy. it's rationalisation, pure and simple. imagine a layman trying to help a down syndrome person, failing, getting frustrated, walking away and saying "he deserves everything that happens to him, because he obviously doesn't want to help himself." milquetoast liberal redditors and kiwi farms browsers are more willing to deploy this bootstraps sort of rhetoric against a man who had the whole deck of cards stacked against him than against their own able-bodied, neurotypical, tertiary educated peers. what a joke. if chris were not an "internet personality", if you were a social worker going to work to treat a disabled man, you would not hold things like his "homophobia" against him, and consider him an "asshole" because of it, and you would certainly not consider any of this roman colosseum style public humiliation remotely appropriate to his situation. note also the high functioning autistic people -- who either would never have had symptoms as severe as him or who received therapy from an early age (unlike chris) -- who like to chime in and say there's "no excuse" for his behaviour (probably because humans like to believe their good fortune is the result of their own merit, rather than circumstances beyond their control). it is like a medicated schizophrenic saying there's no excuse for un-medicated schizophrenics to believe they have thoughts injected into their brains by radio towers. when you watch those videos of autistic adults who literally can't even speak and compulsively hit themselves... do you think they say the same thing there? they're just choosing that? there's no excuse? stop using autism as an excuse? etc.
Wat them do
for being arrested, I dont know how to spoiler so tw rape and incest
raping their dementia ridden mother
chris chan is a good case study in the endless capacity of psychologically normal "moral" people to justify high school bullying behaviour as anything other than what it obviously is. the amoral trolls who interfere in chris' life directly are less odious than the middle class homebodies writing long articles detailing all of a severely disabled man's "moral failings" in a victorian tone of self-righteous disapproval (oh dear, the man with the alien neurobiology said something taboo and socially inappropriate, how dreadful!). what i find particularly amusing is the repeated refrain "i used to sympathise with chris, but he has never gotten better despite all the advice we've given" as if the unqualified platitudes of random internet rtards constitute some kind of legitimate therapy. it's rationalisation, pure and simple. imagine a layman trying to help a down syndrome person, failing, getting frustrated, walking away and saying "he deserves everything that happens to him, because he obviously doesn't want to help himself." milquetoast liberal redditors and kiwi farms browsers are more willing to deploy this bootstraps sort of rhetoric against a man who had the whole deck of cards stacked against him than against their own able-bodied, neurotypical, tertiary educated peers. what a joke. if chris were not an "internet personality", if you were a social worker going to work to treat a disabled man, you would not hold things like his "homophobia" against him, and consider him an "asshole" because of it, and you would certainly not consider any of this roman colosseum style public humiliation remotely appropriate to his situation. note also the high functioning autistic people -- who either would never have had symptoms as severe as him or who received therapy from an early age (unlike chris) -- who like to chime in and say there's "no excuse" for his behaviour (probably because humans like to believe their good fortune is the result of their own merit, rather than circumstances beyond their control). it is like a medicated schizophrenic saying there's no excuse for un-medicated schizophrenics to believe they have thoughts injected into their brains by radio towers. when you watch those videos of autistic adults who literally can't even speak and compulsively hit themselves... do you think they say the same thing there? they're just choosing that? there's no excuse? stop using autism as an excuse? etc.
Can't tell if this is a copy pasta, but at the end of the day you're right. Guy didn't deserve to go through 10 years of torment even if he was a weirdo
for being arrested, I dont know how to spoiler so tw rape and incest
raping their dementia ridden mother
Bro wtf did he record it or something this dude is a psycho
Bro wtf did he record it or something this dude is a psycho
was bragging about it in a text to someone who leaked it, apparently theirs a rumour of them fingering their mother out there
Bro wtf did he record it or something this dude is a psycho
this person is probably the most documented person in the history of the internet. sickening what they did to their mother, also sickening how people continued to toy along this obviously mentally disadvantaged person
was bragging about it in a text to someone who leaked it, apparently theirs a rumour of them fingering their mother out there
Disgusting
chris chan is a good case study in the endless capacity of psychologically normal "moral" people to justify high school bullying behaviour as anything other than what it obviously is. the amoral trolls who interfere in chris' life directly are less odious than the middle class homebodies writing long articles detailing all of a severely disabled man's "moral failings" in a victorian tone of self-righteous disapproval (oh dear, the man with the alien neurobiology said something taboo and socially inappropriate, how dreadful!). what i find particularly amusing is the repeated refrain "i used to sympathise with chris, but he has never gotten better despite all the advice we've given" as if the unqualified platitudes of random internet rtards constitute some kind of legitimate therapy. it's rationalisation, pure and simple. imagine a layman trying to help a down syndrome person, failing, getting frustrated, walking away and saying "he deserves everything that happens to him, because he obviously doesn't want to help himself." milquetoast liberal redditors and kiwi farms browsers are more willing to deploy this bootstraps sort of rhetoric against a man who had the whole deck of cards stacked against him than against their own able-bodied, neurotypical, tertiary educated peers. what a joke. if chris were not an "internet personality", if you were a social worker going to work to treat a disabled man, you would not hold things like his "homophobia" against him, and consider him an "asshole" because of it, and you would certainly not consider any of this roman colosseum style public humiliation remotely appropriate to his situation. note also the high functioning autistic people -- who either would never have had symptoms as severe as him or who received therapy from an early age (unlike chris) -- who like to chime in and say there's "no excuse" for his behaviour (probably because humans like to believe their good fortune is the result of their own merit, rather than circumstances beyond their control). it is like a medicated schizophrenic saying there's no excuse for un-medicated schizophrenics to believe they have thoughts injected into their brains by radio towers. when you watch those videos of autistic adults who literally can't even speak and compulsively hit themselves... do you think they say the same thing there? they're just choosing that? there's no excuse? stop using autism as an excuse? etc.
These wall of text posts are so difficult to read without capitalisation
I know what he did but why exactly was he semi famous before that incident
lolcow basically the internet found out of them from sonic fanart they made and found out they were very easy to troll. Theres a 60ish part serie on their life on YouTube not done yet either but honestly its better if this the last time u ever think about Chris chan again