They gon f*** around and catch a ninja bomb missile
Dead at "to reduce collateral damage"
In a straight up war I'm putting money on the U.S of A. But I think China would be very spiteful, and would do something that assures mutual destruction.
Artificial intellegence already plays a bigger role in your life than you may think. You already use it on a day-to-day basis with things like Siri, Amazon Alexa, Netflix/Youtube recommendations ,etc.
Militaries are also obviously going to keep up with the latest tech to ensure they don't get left behind. Let's also not forget that the U.S military was already using the internet to communicate with each other in the 1960's. It wasn't until the 1990's that the internet was finally introduced to the general public with the World-Wide-Web.
The list of things I mentioned aren't even that crazy lol. A lot the tech is either already prepared , or currently in the works.
https://twitter.com/thandojo/status/1273574893120962561https://twitter.com/CNPakWW/status/1273905994645594114https://twitter.com/baztand/status/976900603979948032https://twitter.com/XHNews/status/1227156548650012673https://twitter.com/hackermaderas/status/1072017821973053442If this is what they're willing to show us, then imagine the type of things that they're hiding from us ?
I also suggest you check this vid out if you got 10min to spare. It's interesting and worth a watch.
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLo3e1Pak-YThe FBI is definitely flagging you for linking all of these
Bruh that youtube video is nuts
America got kicked out Afghanistan by dudes shooting broken AKs and wearing flip flops to climb mountains
America got kicked out Afghanistan by dudes shooting broken AKs and wearing flip flops to climb mountains
When you guys bring up, “but America lost to Vietnam and afghanistan” you’re not looking at the bigger picture here. America’s wars against Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq were not them putting their full military force against another state, it was them allocating resources towards helping a seperate party defeat the enemy. In each of these cases though, the party they were helping were pretty unqualified and unprepared and ended up getting defeated. The us didn’t lose an actual one on one battle with the north Vietnamese, the war was an objective failure because the south couldn’t hold their own weight. When the US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan those countries national governments fell apart in a matter of weeks and military operations have consisted of them helping the new governments fight insurgencies. If America was fighting to defeat, they would have just blown through afghanistan and left it in rubble, but that can’t go in the international community
I’m not saying this to defend or big up America. Most foreign engagements since WW2 have been unjustified or made the situation worse. But it’s important to see the distinction between a one on one war with China, which would resemble how they acted against Germany and Japan, when compared with them sending forces to aid a specific side, which would more resemble their engagements and failures in Vietnam and Afghanistan
Idk but you’re asking a forum that’s like 70% commie lmao
Also this, people projecting what they want to happen and not actual reality
Those numbers are fake. China is spending way more on defense (around 400 billion based on PPP)
Great video:
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32ZR2iAisVQChina spends less because it costs less for them to manufacture They have more destroyers now at one base than the entire British Navy lol
Annoying that we have to drop so many bills on military spending because Europe doesn’t pull their weight anymore
Both countries destroy each other and the rest of the world wins.
Putin would be like
Annoying that we have to drop so many bills on military spending because Europe doesn’t pull their weight anymore
Trump is an idiot no doubt but he's 100% right on NATO issue. They should pay fair share!! Germany especially needs to spend more on defense. Just 1.3 percent of Germany's economic output went toward defense last year that's miles below NATO minimum of 2%. Same with Canada, Spain and Italy it’s ridiculous tbh.
Trump is right, it's about time Germany pays for its own defense
Nobody wins in war.
Families will lose loved ones,innocent men women and children will die.
Realest answer itt
It depends on what the goals of the war are. If it came to attrition it’d be interesting to see if the US arsenal would outlast the sheer manpower of China - nukes notwithstanding.
Also it seems like the wouldn’t be boots on the ground but instead the Air Force/drones so in theory if it didn’t escalate into an invasion, the casualty count may not be that high
US quicker than Masvidal v. Askren
Trump is an idiot no doubt but he's 100% right on NATO issue. They should pay fair share!! Germany especially needs to spend more on defense. Just 1.3 percent of Germany's economic output went toward defense last year that's miles below NATO minimum of 2%. Same with Canada, Spain and Italy it’s ridiculous tbh.
Trump is right, it's about time Germany pays for its own defense
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq0IlhRWYokhttps://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/15/trump-germany-military-320560
Wow, this graph is absolutely mind boggling. I knew we paid a lot more than them but we literally pay more than the rest of the free world combined lol
bro niggas are straight up ed itt lmao
The US Army is basically as close as we'll ever get to God when it comes to raw power lol
China would lose pretty easily lol, the only question here is the nuclear bombs lol
China could just guerilla warfare tactics and win
See that s*** only works in this climate lol
If a major war breaks out and nations go back to WW2 style warfare, that s*** is done lmao.
Guerilla warfare aint that useful against large scale carpet combing lmao
See that s*** only works in this climate lol
If a major war breaks out and nations go back to WW2 style warfare, that s*** is done lmao.
Guerilla warfare aint that useful against large scale carpet combing lmao
Vietnam disagrees
Those numbers are fake. China is spending way more on defense (around 400 billion based on PPP)
Great video:
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32ZR2iAisVQChina spends less because it costs less for them to manufacture They have more destroyers now at one base than the entire British Navy lol
Just in: US Navy announces intent to ink $10 billion in contracts for first 2 Columbia subs
Perfect example @rara $10 Billion for a couple of nuclear missile carrying submarines
China can build s*** cheaper :word: