cool
wow that is a whole next level of like mis-quoting someone. interesting how they didn't put the video in the tweet. you can watch the video in the original article; he doesn't say anything close to the headline. i genuinely rewatched it like 10 times trying to figure out where he said "we're gonna kill democrats". he doesn't even say the word "democrat" once in the entire 1 minute video. the closest thing i can find is he says something like "if voters are intimidated, some of us who are tasked with standing up to protect their rights will" and then immediatedly follows it with "but standing up for rights is always spun as we're the ones (intimidating others/causing violence)...like as if our militia mention are on the streets on election day intimidating voters. And that's what (they're) going to do (...) coercing trump voters". the part where he says "our militia men are gonna be on the street" is in a part of the sentence which is clearly him giving an example of what the news is going to spin their existence as, not him endorsing that. The fact that they titled the headline that should actually legitimately be illegal. they can't even find a citation in the actual article which implies anything to the extent of the headline.
wow that is a whole next level of like mis-quoting someone. interesting how they didn't put the video in the tweet. you can watch the video in the original article; he doesn't say anything close to the headline. i genuinely rewatched it like 10 times trying to figure out where he said "we're gonna kill democrats". he doesn't even say the word "democrat" once in the entire 1 minute video. the closest thing i can find is he says something like "if voters are intimidated, some of us who are tasked with standing up to protect their rights will" and then immediatedly follows it with "but standing up for rights is always spun as we're the ones (intimidating others/causing violence)...like as if our militia mention are on the streets on election day intimidating voters. And that's what (they're) going to do (...) coercing trump voters". the part where he says "our militia men are gonna be on the street" is in a part of the sentence which is clearly him giving an example of what the news is going to spin their existence as, not him endorsing that. The fact that they titled the headline that should actually legitimately be illegal. they can't even find a citation in the actual article which implies anything to the extent of the headline.
they know people wont bother to check the source if itβs what they want to hear
I can't wait till she fades into obscurity like milo milanoslzpskpopppopis
This was cringe but what was in the comments really was a reminder of how morally corrupt politicians are
oh my god this is real
oh my god this is real
yeah it but from 2015, no one really cared back then what you posted on social media. people forget that like 2013-2015 and <2013 were both completely different eras. the term "fake news" wasn't even in the discourse yet and neither was "cancel culture" really.
yeah it but from 2015, no one really cared back then what you posted on social media. people forget that like 2013-2015 and <2013 were both completely different eras. the term "fake news" wasn't even in the discourse yet and neither was "cancel culture" really.
fax but now people trying to cancel 25 year olds for tweets from 2007
underrated thread, gonna miss it after tuesday
underrated thread, gonna miss it after tuesday
might rename it to general cursed politics thread after election night, i'm sure there's gonna be a ton of s*** regardless of who wins worthy of posting
might rename it to general cursed politics thread after election night, i'm sure there's gonna be a ton of s*** regardless of who wins worthy of posting
Omg lmfao.
The right wing is batshit
Wtf is going on.
This feel like racism
Wtf is going on.
This feel like racism
They dressed up for halloween to announce the damage and it quickly became the most cursed thing possible