Reply
  • Jbreezyondeck

    Cool article

    https://twitter.com/politico/status/2118298855179460969

    Bro definitely was too early in a decade for running as president. Hillary Clinton and their Israel democrats really f***ed us over

  • Rockstard

    Mississippi and Texas went blue before California taxed billionaires smfh

    Y'all didn't pass the ordinance?

  • ·
    1 reply
    ragedsycokiller

    Y'all didn't pass the ordinance?

    Nope! And prop 42, a ban on future taxes on "personal property" passed smh apparently California has 4 million billionaires

  • Jbreezyondeck

    Cool article

    https://twitter.com/politico/status/2118298855179460969

    Real one

  • ·
    1 reply

    The argument over underperformed is stupid. Winning your primary is part of winning your election. If your candidate can't do that, you have no right to complain, especially if they had more money and Dem machinery behind them. Respect democracy.

    And you know maybe the presence of progressives like AES in the Dems motivates progressives across the country to get out and vote for their local candidate and for the Democratic Party even if they aren't as progressive as he is.

  • ·
    1 reply

    Still not seeing any Republicans take accountability for allowing ICE to terrorize Hispanic communities.

    Looks like Texas will stay blue for a while.

  • SCOUSER

    The argument over underperformed is stupid. Winning your primary is part of winning your election. If your candidate can't do that, you have no right to complain, especially if they had more money and Dem machinery behind them. Respect democracy.

    And you know maybe the presence of progressives like AES in the Dems motivates progressives across the country to get out and vote for their local candidate and for the Democratic Party even if they aren't as progressive as he is.

    Democrats will always vote Democrat
    People on the fence will not be voting R for the next few years

    Now’s the time to push left

  • If you want an obnoxious and embarrassing Republican congressman caricature to laugh at these next two years, check out Anthony Constantino of NY-21

  • ·
    3 replies

    They’re back with the Qanon conspiracy theories

  • ·
    1 reply
  • BlueDream

    They’re back with the Qanon conspiracy theories

    https://twitter.com/political_rock/status/2118318250110898523

    My sources say trump is stable

    Please god

  • ·
    1 reply
    BlueDream

    They’re back with the Qanon conspiracy theories

    https://twitter.com/political_rock/status/2118318250110898523

    They going 0 for 2643931 with the conspiracy theories of Trump actually playing 5D chess since 2016

  • st jpeg 🖼️
    BlueDream

    They’re back with the Qanon conspiracy theories

    https://twitter.com/political_rock/status/2118318250110898523

    He'll get on this right after he exposes everyone in the Epstein files just as the Q texts foretold

  • Young D
    · edited

    Register to vote! https://vote.gov/

    Discuss the general election midterm races & upcoming primaries that will be taking place in 2026!

    First primaries take place in March -- check here for a complete list of dates: https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/2026-state-primary-election-dates

    Consensus projections entering January for Congress & Governors races:

    Senate

    House

    Governors

    Results as of November 6:

    Senate:

    House:

    How do the maps in @op look now?

  • ·
    1 reply
    KayTray

    Still not seeing any Republicans take accountability for allowing ICE to terrorize Hispanic communities.

    Looks like Texas will stay blue for a while.

    lol crazy how this was the message during the presidential election even worse in 2016 and a majority still voted republican. like what did they expect

  • ·
    1 reply
    bigpapiD

    lol crazy how this was the message during the presidential election even worse in 2016 and a majority still voted republican. like what did they expect

    why are you overestimating the average voter

  • ·
    1 reply
    Rockstard

    Nope! And prop 42, a ban on future taxes on "personal property" passed smh apparently California has 4 million billionaires

    man them billions paper money. not like it was getting taxed anytime soon

    but damna 37% tax on just a billion for all 4 million is 1.5 quintillion. holy s***.

  • ·
    2 replies
    bigpapiD

    man them billions paper money. not like it was getting taxed anytime soon

    but damna 37% tax on just a billion for all 4 million is 1.5 quintillion. holy s***.

    That was a joke on my part about the 4million+ that voted no lol. CA has about 40 billionaires that would have been effected

  • Jim Halpert

    why are you overestimating the average voter

    i feel like it's kinda different in this scenario tho
    alot of people are 1 issue voters so just wondering what made hispanics vote republican. (seems like they just didn't want other hispanics coming in)

  • Rockstard

    That was a joke on my part about the 4million+ that voted no lol. CA has about 40 billionaires that would have been effected

    lol got u
    cause i fr believed it was 4 milli billionaires in cali

  • ·
    1 reply
    Rockstard

    That was a joke on my part about the 4million+ that voted no lol. CA has about 40 billionaires that would have been effected

    was the plan to just tax them one time or annually?

  • ·
    1 reply
    bigpapiD

    was the plan to just tax them one time or annually?

    Would've been a one time 5% tax on property and assets, but there was phrasing in the bill that said something like a future tax could be enacted with a 2/3 state senate vote, without specifying who they could tax in the future. The billionaires jumped at the phrasing and used it to scare the sheeple into thinking their little itty bitty 401ks and retirements would be next

  • Rockstard

    Would've been a one time 5% tax on property and assets, but there was phrasing in the bill that said something like a future tax could be enacted with a 2/3 state senate vote, without specifying who they could tax in the future. The billionaires jumped at the phrasing and used it to scare the sheeple into thinking their little itty bitty 401ks and retirements would be next

    ok not itty bitty. long term could be very worthwhile.
    but the future tax phrasing is crazy. I guess they didn't want to put it in wax that they wouldn't tax a second time but I can see why

    and 5% is pretty low. I was thinking at least 30%