ACTUAL Unpopular Opinion:
Smoking is good for you.
The claim that you’ll get cancer is entirely false.
Cigarettes are anti-estrogenic.
Testosterone boosting.
And fight against a myriad of illnesses and disease.
“They” would never want you to know this, of course.
"No ingredient of cigarette smoke has been shown to cause human lung cancer. No-one has been able to produce lung cancer in laboratory animals from smoking."
— Professor Schrauzer, President of the International Bio-inorganic Chemists
"It is fanciful extrapolation - not factual data. The unscientific way in which the study was made bothers us most. The committee agreed first that smoking causes lung cancer and then they set out to prove it statistically."
— Professor M.B. Rosenblatt, New York Medical College
ACTUAL Unpopular Opinion:
Smoking is good for you.
The claim that you’ll get cancer is entirely false.
Cigarettes are anti-estrogenic.
Testosterone boosting.
And fight against a myriad of illnesses and disease.
“They” would never want you to know this, of course.
"No ingredient of cigarette smoke has been shown to cause human lung cancer. No-one has been able to produce lung cancer in laboratory animals from smoking."
— Professor Schrauzer, President of the International Bio-inorganic Chemists
"It is fanciful extrapolation - not factual data. The unscientific way in which the study was made bothers us most. The committee agreed first that smoking causes lung cancer and then they set out to prove it statistically."
— Professor M.B. Rosenblatt, New York Medical College
https://www.sott.net/article/338885-A-comprehensive-review-of-the-many-health-benefits-of-smoking-Tobacco?fbclid=IwAR1UUb4f0toc7FqMKQd6vCQmfPcdF4xtoMmV9ZRrQgS2hHC6XeX2iniDTTg
ACTUAL Unpopular Opinion:
Smoking is good for you.
The claim that you’ll get cancer is entirely false.
Cigarettes are anti-estrogenic.
Testosterone boosting.
And fight against a myriad of illnesses and disease.
“They” would never want you to know this, of course.
"No ingredient of cigarette smoke has been shown to cause human lung cancer. No-one has been able to produce lung cancer in laboratory animals from smoking."
— Professor Schrauzer, President of the International Bio-inorganic Chemists
"It is fanciful extrapolation - not factual data. The unscientific way in which the study was made bothers us most. The committee agreed first that smoking causes lung cancer and then they set out to prove it statistically."
— Professor M.B. Rosenblatt, New York Medical College
https://www.sott.net/article/338885-A-comprehensive-review-of-the-many-health-benefits-of-smoking-Tobacco?fbclid=IwAR1UUb4f0toc7FqMKQd6vCQmfPcdF4xtoMmV9ZRrQgS2hHC6XeX2iniDTTg
Nice "they" in ur post like we don't know who you mean.
Decades of scientific study vs one ktt poster. Who will win.
Nice "they" in ur post like we don't know who you mean.
Decades of scientific study vs one ktt poster. Who will win.
I always root for the underdog
Oh. Your one citation for Professor M.B. Rosenblatt, was from the 50s. Hes barely even published works, and didn't have 50 years of additional statistics.
Nice "they" in ur post like we don't know who you mean.
Decades of scientific study vs one ktt poster. Who will win.
"they" meaning ur mom and dad and ur teacher coming back from the PTA meetings
don't know about it being good for you but I don't see why so many people care if other people smoke
lol op.
benefit (from 70 year old article): protects against the flu
every other scientist: it kills you
smoking cured my asthma fam
u guys r being fed bullshit
Why did I respond he's 100% right
Professor Schrauzer said it. pack it up boys its over
don't know about it being good for you but I don't see why so many people care if other people smoke
if someone smokes around me it's rude and harmful to my health
if they do it on their own time away from me, idc, but i think it's too bad that they're doing something harmful to themselves
that being said, i eat lots of processed foods, which are harmful to myself
if someone smokes around me it's rude and harmful to my health
if they do it on their own time away from me, idc, but i think it's too bad that they're doing something harmful to themselves
that being said, i eat lots of processed foods, which are harmful to myself
remove yourself from the area then
remove yourself from the area then
why shouldn't they remove themselves from the area
why shouldn't they remove themselves from the area
unless its a no smoking area they can smoke wherever they want
unless its a no smoking area they can smoke wherever they want
in some states, public smoking is outlawed, to an extent
But yes, obviously I wouldn't be a d*** to someone who was smoking in an area they're allowed to, especially if they were there first.