Right
But that won’t change
So whatever factors you can change
You change them
And the reasoning for whether those factors actually are factors for change
Is deduced through reasoning
Not appealing to an authority on the matter
but choosing to vote for Kamala since it’s better than Trump is appealing to authority
blocking you because your stupid ass makes my head hurt
would’ve had fun acc arguing about the best scenario for Palestine on discord cuz ur illlogival anger would probably be funny to witness and I might atleast get some valuable points out of you but go ahead i know the idea of “u should reason this idea” is so insane to you i might be wrong that even in ur area of specialty you would have anything of substance to say if u dont have that fundamental idea
but choosing to vote for Kamala since it’s better than Trump is appealing to authority
Whether Kamala is better than trump for it or not
I reach that conclusion through reasoning
Not that someone else told me it’s true
You right, I gotta get back to this Hasan stream to get some knowledge
you’re being very disingenuous
as if he is the sole arbiter regarding this conflict
Whether Kamala is better than trump for it or not
I reach that conclusion through reasoning
Not that someone else told me it’s true
there is no reasoning between 2 people who support genocide
soon as you know they rep either party, it’s a dub lmfao
there is no reasoning between 2 people who support genocide
soon as you know they rep either party, it’s a dub lmfao
no US candidate will ever abandon israel as an ally and if they did run on that they would never win
maybe one day but as of last election no
it would disadvantage them if israel was destroyed. of course kamala isnt gonna agree to withdraw all the funds
but, if that is an inveitability for the next four years
one option would lead to it being a way more greulling 4 years, possibly the nail in the coffin for the region
vs is atleast expressing an interest in negotiations with israel and at worst it would just be maintaining the status quo which provides more time for action and possibility to occur.
when i say reasoning, i say you should be able to reason whether one scenario is better than the other
the fact is you have to deal with atleast one. you are choosing which one you go with by your action or inaction
and if you wanna say both are equally bad, then you should reach that through your own reasoning in your head, not because someoen else told you thats the case. as sally was doing
All these idiots calling him zionist are just playing their tune and hoping he dances to it. Only a clown would fall for crap like this.
All these idiots calling him zionist are just playing their tune and hoping he dances to it. Only a clown would fall for crap like this.
go on
99% of israeli jews are zionists and say whats happening to gaza is not enough. Most also say to get s ceasefire, get the hostages back, then wipe out the Palestinians.
just rotten scum of the earth
Wait he’s Israeli? No wonder he’s been pushed on us by the media
not every celeb/figure can be a Malcolm X, probably just ignore it especially in the industry
no US candidate will ever abandon israel as an ally and if they did run on that they would never win
maybe one day but as of last election no
it would disadvantage them if israel was destroyed. of course kamala isnt gonna agree to withdraw all the funds
but, if that is an inveitability for the next four years
one option would lead to it being a way more greulling 4 years, possibly the nail in the coffin for the region
vs is atleast expressing an interest in negotiations with israel and at worst it would just be maintaining the status quo which provides more time for action and possibility to occur.
when i say reasoning, i say you should be able to reason whether one scenario is better than the other
the fact is you have to deal with atleast one. you are choosing which one you go with by your action or inaction
and if you wanna say both are equally bad, then you should reach that through your own reasoning in your head, not because someoen else told you thats the case. as sally was doing
voting 3rd party is still a choice even if it doesn’t win
voting 3rd party is still a choice even if it doesn’t win
I mean I jsut see that as a waste of time cuz we all know they won’t but, that’s much better 
It’s fine if u vote a third party but like there’s legitimate reasons why someone would say vote Kamala and vehemently think voting trump is worse for the situation yknow if people didn’t paint it as this doomer thing I don’t think ppl could’ve exploited that and convinced the Arabs in Michigan to vote red, a critical state. We should atleast be able to acknowledge one is probably better even if we disagree
What's the best path for someone who knows nothing about the israel - palestine conflict to take to move towards becoming informed? Imagine you're talking to someone who's never researched anything in their life.
Please don't reply if it's gonna be some unhelpful snarky s*** like "it's not our job to help you get informed about an active genocide".
Study the geographics
S*** hard
can we take a pause & address this jackass coming itt to praise a song from “israeli salad”
can we take a pause & address this jackass coming itt to praise a song from “israeli salad”
but but but but it’s only a beat tape from 10 years ago as if this all started yesterday
Whether Kamala is better than trump for it or not
I reach that conclusion through reasoning
Not that someone else told me it’s true
Shorty killed 200k+ Palestinians, vowed she wouldn’t stop, and you’re trying to justify voting for her so you don’t feel guilty about rewarding someone who committed genocide.
I didn’t wanna go the “you got blood on your hands” route but ya’ll been talking spicy throwing Arabs and Palestinians under the bus so f*** it I’ll play your game too
Shorty killed 200k+ Palestinians, vowed she wouldn’t stop, and you’re trying to justify voting for her so you don’t feel guilty about rewarding someone who committed genocide.
I didn’t wanna go the “you got blood on your hands” route but ya’ll been talking spicy throwing Arabs and Palestinians under the bus so f*** it I’ll play your game too
how is it throwing arabs under the bus to say i dont think basing your opinion on whether to vote for someone or not on what someone else says you shouldnt is bad? you can rely on that, but you cant use the fact this group said this is bad as evidence that it IS. Thats jsut basic reasoning.
yea she hasnt stopped it. doesnt change that shed prolly be better for the scenario than trump. Im not the one who made it so i have to pick between the two, so idont know why id feel guilt. she isnt ideal and not even good but its preferable to making things significantly worse in significantly less time.
how is it throwing arabs under the bus to say i dont think basing your opinion on whether to vote for someone or not on what someone else says you shouldnt is bad? you can rely on that, but you cant use the fact this group said this is bad as evidence that it IS. Thats jsut basic reasoning.
yea she hasnt stopped it. doesnt change that shed prolly be better for the scenario than trump. Im not the one who made it so i have to pick between the two, so idont know why id feel guilt. she isnt ideal and not even good but its preferable to making things significantly worse in significantly less time.
I mean I jsut see that as a waste of time cuz we all know they won’t but, that’s much better 
It’s fine if u vote a third party but like there’s legitimate reasons why someone would say vote Kamala and vehemently think voting trump is worse for the situation yknow if people didn’t paint it as this doomer thing I don’t think ppl could’ve exploited that and convinced the Arabs in Michigan to vote red, a critical state. We should atleast be able to acknowledge one is probably better even if we disagree
Biden, Hillary and Kamala are #1, #3, and #4 US Senators in receiving aid from AIPAC for their campaigns