In today’s situation the more streams you have the more money you earn PER stream. All you have to do is make it equal for every artists or switch it so you get more money per stream for less streams. How is this fair? Because indie artists will get more and successful artists will get less, but not significantly less and it doesn’t really affect them personally, just the label. Since it affects the label it will maybe encourage them to promote more artists instead of capitalizing only on their stars.
thats not true tho. Spotify for example pools all the money they made for one month and divide it by number of streams that month.
The way Spotify and Apple Music pay artists is simple. They take all of the money generated from users, whether by advertisements or subscriptions, and put in a big pot. They then divide that pot by the total share of streams each artist received. So, if Apple Music gave $100 million of their revenues to artists in a month, and Drake songs accounted 1% of all streams that month, then Drake (and the writers of Drake’s songs) would receive $1 million.
google.com/amp/s/qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair/amp
thats not true tho. Spotify for example pools all the money they made for one month and divide it by number of streams that month.
The way Spotify and Apple Music pay artists is simple. They take all of the money generated from users, whether by advertisements or subscriptions, and put in a big pot. They then divide that pot by the total share of streams each artist received. So, if Apple Music gave $100 million of their revenues to artists in a month, and Drake songs accounted 1% of all streams that month, then Drake (and the writers of Drake’s songs) would receive $1 million.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair/amp/
Except that this actually as it stands now results in an unfair amount going to major label artists
Look this study
qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair
The issue is that the hours each user spends listening to music differs which results in an unfair split based on the revenue each user provides the service
They do
It’s unfairly balanced in favor of major artists right now
They get a larger relative piece of the pie
Yes only 2 should count. You’re obviously not in favor of that because all your threads are related to a song that is abusing that system but the fact that it’s being abused is an issue - they can buy copies for their friends but those additional copies shouldn’t count for chart position
Chart postion is more debatable. Should only so many streams count then?
but I think they should 100% count for certifications
Chart postion is more debatable. Should only so many streams count then?
but I think they should 100% count for certifications
I mean I wouldn’t be anti a limited amount of streams from one user counting
But in order for one user to stream the equivalent of 4 sold copies they’d have to stream the song 5000 times in one week which is physically impossible for any song that’s a reasonable length
Chart postion is more debatable. Should only so many streams count then?
but I think they should 100% count for certifications
Agree on certifications btw
Not necessarily and especially not for small artists
I tried this very thing myself to make money and Spotify removed the song from platforms despite the fact that I switched VPN regularly
obviously if u only have one listener lmao
obviously if u only have one listener lmao
I had 10 other people doing the same
Let’s say Nicki says if you stream her song 1000 times you get a free T shirt, a lot of fans will stream the song and that is abusing the system and making the song chart high unorganically
Is that really cheating tho? If you have loyal fans that are streaming and buying the actual music?
I would agree if you said bundles should not count because they wernt buying the actual music they were buying the product.
Except that this actually as it stands now results in an unfair amount going to major label artists
Look this study
https://qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair/
The issue is that the hours each user spends listening to music differs which results in an unfair split based on the revenue each user provides the service
Its not an "unfair amount" its a certain pay per stream.
But basically you just debunked your own narrative that bigger artist make more per stream...
I think you are trying to say what the article was saying and that each user who for example pays $10 a month that $10 should be split amongst the artist they listen to instead of going into a big pot.
Your original post state one artsit can get more per stream then another artist which is false
Its not an "unfair amount" its a certain pay per stream.
But basically you just debunked your own narrative that bigger artist make more per stream...
I think you are trying to say what the article was saying and that each user who for example pays $10 a month that $10 should be split amongst the artist they listen to instead of going into a big pot.
Your original post state one artsit can get more per stream then another artist which is false
Yea you right I misread what the percentages stood for
I mean I wouldn’t be anti a limited amount of streams from one user counting
But in order for one user to stream the equivalent of 4 sold copies they’d have to stream the song 5000 times in one week which is physically impossible for any song that’s a reasonable length
I think for sales any number of stream/sales should count
But I would agree for chart placement it should be number of people who listened to the song or something similar because that is more an accurate measure of whats popular
haven't read this yet
but i feel like they should only count the sales
streams are not sales to me
they can count them separately if they want
but sales should be sales imo
even if you include the digital sales with the other merch
Yea you right I misread what the percentages stood for
I think we can agree that for instance person A pays $10 a month and only listens to one artist that $10 shoulnt go to anyone else.
I think this would actually help indie artist more
haven't read this yet
but i feel like they should only count the sales
streams are not sales to me
they can count them separately if they want
but sales should be sales imo
even if you include the digital sales with the other merch
Read what OP wrote at least before commenting lol
I think we can agree that for instance person A pays $10 a month and only listens to one artist that $10 shoulnt go to anyone else.
I think this would actually help indie artist more
Yea 100%
Yea 100%
"Many people in the music industry would prefer a payment system that was “user-centric.” Under this system, each user’s payment would be distributed based on what they streamed. If half of a user’s streams are Rolling Stones songs and half are Beyoncé, then those two artists are the only ones who earn money from that user. In this case, all of Anna’s money would have gone to The Expressionists."
This is from the article you should change your orignal post to include this haha
"Many people in the music industry would prefer a payment system that was “user-centric.” Under this system, each user’s payment would be distributed based on what they streamed. If half of a user’s streams are Rolling Stones songs and half are Beyoncé, then those two artists are the only ones who earn money from that user. In this case, all of Anna’s money would have gone to The Expressionists."
This is from the article you should change your orignal post to include this haha
will add tonight
Read what OP wrote at least before commenting lol
just read it
still standing by streams not equaling sales
just read it
still standing by streams not equaling sales
what are you even referring to?
like, no amount of streams equals a sale to me
1250 paid streams equals one album sale for bilboard
125 paid streams equals one song sale for bilboard
I think thats fair. How many songs do you have from 2020 that you streamed over 125 times?
what are you even referring to?
Streaming
"Streaming is obviously the future of music. Anyone denying this is delusional. While criticism about payment from streaming services is somewhat overblown – a ‘sale’ from streaming means the same amount of money is generated as a pure sale – it needs to increase. As labels lose influence, streaming services gain influence. So what needs to happen in this area?"
streaming is not going anywhere
and a lot of people want the value of streams to be higher
but i'm saying
i do not believe any amount of streams can be equated to the sale of a product
1250 paid streams equals one album sale for bilboard
125 paid streams equals one song sale for bilboard
I think thats fair. How many songs do you have from 2020 that you streamed over 125 times?
this is kind of my point
there are albums i've purchased that i love that i've never listened to that many times
in this era, i feel like it's needlessly complicated
if you purchased something, it should be a sale
if you are just streaming it, that's something else entirely imo
because i'll check out somebody's s*** if it's on steaming
but i'm not buying it
and even if i like your s***, i'm prolly not listening that many times
i feel like we are losing the battle if we get caught up in the values of the streams
of course i want artists to get more money
but that wouldn't be a good move for the streaming companies
so any proposal i support would be about creating real engagement between fans and artists
like twitch or patreon etc
i'm all for the money going directly to the artists
this is kind of my point
there are albums i've purchased that i love that i've never listened to that many times
in this era, i feel like it's needlessly complicated
if you purchased something, it should be a sale
if you are just streaming it, that's something else entirely imo
because i'll check out somebody's s*** if it's on steaming
but i'm not buying it
and even if i like your s***, i'm prolly not listening that many times
i feel like we are losing the battle if we get caught up in the values of the streams
of course i want artists to get more money
but that wouldn't be a good move for the streaming companies
so any proposal i support would be about creating real engagement between fans and artists
like twitch or patreon etc
i'm all for the money going directly to the artists
It is counted differently lol
They use "pure" sales = physical and digital album purchases including bundles
TEA = Track equivalent albums which is individual song purchases 10 song purchases = 1 album sales
SEA = Stream equivalent albums which is 1250 paid streams is 1 unit and 3750 free is one unit.
They add all of these together to get the total "album equivalent units"
It is counted differently lol
They use "pure" sales = physical and digital album purchases including bundles
TEA = Track equivalent albums which is individual song purchases 10 song purchases = 1 album sales
SEA = Stream equivalent albums which is 1250 paid streams is 1 unit and 3750 free is one unit.
They add all of these together to get the total "album equivalent units"
https://hitsdailydouble.com/sales_plus_streaming
i understand this
but i'm saying
the streams should
not count as sales
because they aren't
sales they are streams