Reply
  • Aug 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    flizzy 999

    In today’s situation the more streams you have the more money you earn PER stream. All you have to do is make it equal for every artists or switch it so you get more money per stream for less streams. How is this fair? Because indie artists will get more and successful artists will get less, but not significantly less and it doesn’t really affect them personally, just the label. Since it affects the label it will maybe encourage them to promote more artists instead of capitalizing only on their stars.

    thats not true tho. Spotify for example pools all the money they made for one month and divide it by number of streams that month.

    The way Spotify and Apple Music pay artists is simple. They take all of the money generated from users, whether by advertisements or subscriptions, and put in a big pot. They then divide that pot by the total share of streams each artist received. So, if Apple Music gave $100 million of their revenues to artists in a month, and Drake songs accounted 1% of all streams that month, then Drake (and the writers of Drake’s songs) would receive $1 million.

    google.com/amp/s/qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair/amp

  • safe 🪩
    OP
    Aug 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Hustle W

    thats not true tho. Spotify for example pools all the money they made for one month and divide it by number of streams that month.

    The way Spotify and Apple Music pay artists is simple. They take all of the money generated from users, whether by advertisements or subscriptions, and put in a big pot. They then divide that pot by the total share of streams each artist received. So, if Apple Music gave $100 million of their revenues to artists in a month, and Drake songs accounted 1% of all streams that month, then Drake (and the writers of Drake’s songs) would receive $1 million.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair/amp/

    Except that this actually as it stands now results in an unfair amount going to major label artists

    Look this study
    qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair

    The issue is that the hours each user spends listening to music differs which results in an unfair split based on the revenue each user provides the service

  • Aug 9, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    safe

    They do
    It’s unfairly balanced in favor of major artists right now
    They get a larger relative piece of the pie

    Yes only 2 should count. You’re obviously not in favor of that because all your threads are related to a song that is abusing that system but the fact that it’s being abused is an issue - they can buy copies for their friends but those additional copies shouldn’t count for chart position

    Chart postion is more debatable. Should only so many streams count then?

    but I think they should 100% count for certifications

  • safe 🪩
    OP
    Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Hustle W

    Chart postion is more debatable. Should only so many streams count then?

    but I think they should 100% count for certifications

    I mean I wouldn’t be anti a limited amount of streams from one user counting

    But in order for one user to stream the equivalent of 4 sold copies they’d have to stream the song 5000 times in one week which is physically impossible for any song that’s a reasonable length

  • safe 🪩
    OP
    Aug 10, 2020
    Hustle W

    Chart postion is more debatable. Should only so many streams count then?

    but I think they should 100% count for certifications

    Agree on certifications btw

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    safe

    Not necessarily and especially not for small artists
    I tried this very thing myself to make money and Spotify removed the song from platforms despite the fact that I switched VPN regularly

    obviously if u only have one listener lmao

  • safe 🪩
    OP
    Aug 10, 2020
    Hustle W

    obviously if u only have one listener lmao

    I had 10 other people doing the same

  • Aug 10, 2020
    flizzy 999

    Let’s say Nicki says if you stream her song 1000 times you get a free T shirt, a lot of fans will stream the song and that is abusing the system and making the song chart high unorganically

    Is that really cheating tho? If you have loyal fans that are streaming and buying the actual music?

    I would agree if you said bundles should not count because they wernt buying the actual music they were buying the product.

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    safe

    Except that this actually as it stands now results in an unfair amount going to major label artists

    Look this study
    https://qz.com/1660465/the-way-spotify-and-apple-music-pays-artists-isnt-fair/

    The issue is that the hours each user spends listening to music differs which results in an unfair split based on the revenue each user provides the service

    Its not an "unfair amount" its a certain pay per stream.

    But basically you just debunked your own narrative that bigger artist make more per stream...

    I think you are trying to say what the article was saying and that each user who for example pays $10 a month that $10 should be split amongst the artist they listen to instead of going into a big pot.

    Your original post state one artsit can get more per stream then another artist which is false

  • safe 🪩
    OP
    Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Hustle W

    Its not an "unfair amount" its a certain pay per stream.

    But basically you just debunked your own narrative that bigger artist make more per stream...

    I think you are trying to say what the article was saying and that each user who for example pays $10 a month that $10 should be split amongst the artist they listen to instead of going into a big pot.

    Your original post state one artsit can get more per stream then another artist which is false

    Yea you right I misread what the percentages stood for

  • Aug 10, 2020
    safe

    I mean I wouldn’t be anti a limited amount of streams from one user counting

    But in order for one user to stream the equivalent of 4 sold copies they’d have to stream the song 5000 times in one week which is physically impossible for any song that’s a reasonable length

    I think for sales any number of stream/sales should count

    But I would agree for chart placement it should be number of people who listened to the song or something similar because that is more an accurate measure of whats popular

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    haven't read this yet

    but i feel like they should only count the sales

    streams are not sales to me

    they can count them separately if they want

    but sales should be sales imo

    even if you include the digital sales with the other merch

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    safe

    Yea you right I misread what the percentages stood for

    I think we can agree that for instance person A pays $10 a month and only listens to one artist that $10 shoulnt go to anyone else.

    I think this would actually help indie artist more

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    notesfromphilo

    haven't read this yet

    but i feel like they should only count the sales

    streams are not sales to me

    they can count them separately if they want

    but sales should be sales imo

    even if you include the digital sales with the other merch

    Read what OP wrote at least before commenting lol

  • safe 🪩
    OP
    Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Hustle W

    I think we can agree that for instance person A pays $10 a month and only listens to one artist that $10 shoulnt go to anyone else.

    I think this would actually help indie artist more

    Yea 100%

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    safe

    Yea 100%

    "Many people in the music industry would prefer a payment system that was “user-centric.” Under this system, each user’s payment would be distributed based on what they streamed. If half of a user’s streams are Rolling Stones songs and half are Beyoncé, then those two artists are the only ones who earn money from that user. In this case, all of Anna’s money would have gone to The Expressionists."

    This is from the article you should change your orignal post to include this haha

  • safe 🪩
    OP
    Aug 10, 2020
    Hustle W

    "Many people in the music industry would prefer a payment system that was “user-centric.” Under this system, each user’s payment would be distributed based on what they streamed. If half of a user’s streams are Rolling Stones songs and half are Beyoncé, then those two artists are the only ones who earn money from that user. In this case, all of Anna’s money would have gone to The Expressionists."

    This is from the article you should change your orignal post to include this haha

    will add tonight

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Hustle W

    Read what OP wrote at least before commenting lol

    just read it

    still standing by streams not equaling sales

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    like, no amount of streams equals a sale to me

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    notesfromphilo

    just read it

    still standing by streams not equaling sales

    what are you even referring to?

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    notesfromphilo

    like, no amount of streams equals a sale to me

    1250 paid streams equals one album sale for bilboard
    125 paid streams equals one song sale for bilboard

    I think thats fair. How many songs do you have from 2020 that you streamed over 125 times?

  • Aug 10, 2020
    Hustle W

    what are you even referring to?

    Streaming

    "Streaming is obviously the future of music. Anyone denying this is delusional. While criticism about payment from streaming services is somewhat overblown – a ‘sale’ from streaming means the same amount of money is generated as a pure sale – it needs to increase. As labels lose influence, streaming services gain influence. So what needs to happen in this area?"

    streaming is not going anywhere

    and a lot of people want the value of streams to be higher

    but i'm saying

    i do not believe any amount of streams can be equated to the sale of a product

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Hustle W

    1250 paid streams equals one album sale for bilboard
    125 paid streams equals one song sale for bilboard

    I think thats fair. How many songs do you have from 2020 that you streamed over 125 times?

    this is kind of my point

    there are albums i've purchased that i love that i've never listened to that many times

    in this era, i feel like it's needlessly complicated

    if you purchased something, it should be a sale

    if you are just streaming it, that's something else entirely imo

    because i'll check out somebody's s*** if it's on steaming

    but i'm not buying it

    and even if i like your s***, i'm prolly not listening that many times

    i feel like we are losing the battle if we get caught up in the values of the streams

    of course i want artists to get more money

    but that wouldn't be a good move for the streaming companies

    so any proposal i support would be about creating real engagement between fans and artists

    like twitch or patreon etc

    i'm all for the money going directly to the artists

  • Aug 10, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    notesfromphilo

    this is kind of my point

    there are albums i've purchased that i love that i've never listened to that many times

    in this era, i feel like it's needlessly complicated

    if you purchased something, it should be a sale

    if you are just streaming it, that's something else entirely imo

    because i'll check out somebody's s*** if it's on steaming

    but i'm not buying it

    and even if i like your s***, i'm prolly not listening that many times

    i feel like we are losing the battle if we get caught up in the values of the streams

    of course i want artists to get more money

    but that wouldn't be a good move for the streaming companies

    so any proposal i support would be about creating real engagement between fans and artists

    like twitch or patreon etc

    i'm all for the money going directly to the artists

    It is counted differently lol

    They use "pure" sales = physical and digital album purchases including bundles

    TEA = Track equivalent albums which is individual song purchases 10 song purchases = 1 album sales

    SEA = Stream equivalent albums which is 1250 paid streams is 1 unit and 3750 free is one unit.

    They add all of these together to get the total "album equivalent units"

    hitsdailydouble.com/sales_plus_streaming

  • Aug 10, 2020
    Hustle W

    It is counted differently lol

    They use "pure" sales = physical and digital album purchases including bundles

    TEA = Track equivalent albums which is individual song purchases 10 song purchases = 1 album sales

    SEA = Stream equivalent albums which is 1250 paid streams is 1 unit and 3750 free is one unit.

    They add all of these together to get the total "album equivalent units"

    https://hitsdailydouble.com/sales_plus_streaming

    i understand this

    but i'm saying
    the streams should
    not count as sales

    because they aren't
    sales they are streams

1
...
6
7
8