You literally imply that in your post lol, whether an implied future evil act exists. When a man is trying to get you to do something you don’t want to do and he can easily overpower you, that’s the implication

please please please bro tell me WHO is saying this

I literally mentioned physical violation in the post you absolute smoothbrain, it's an entire paragraph

There’s literally a whole Sunny episode about this very thing 🤦‍♂️

Yes and in that paragraph you said IF the implied threat was physical. with a man and a woman there’s an inherent implied threat of violence no matter what

Save I guess if he’s like disabled and she’s a f***in power lifter or something

It’s the implication

We don't know what the threat was because she didn't say it in particular. She can say it in the future maybe.

And the "if" exists because you said the threat comes from outside circumstances regarding his fame. The if implies there are two options there (physical threat <-> outside threat) and if the event did happen, that one of those options applies. Learn to read

not saying this to virtue signal but like its crazy to me that some people cant control themselves like its mindboggling

You realize it can be both right

Like if you’re famous and use that to try and coerce people into s***it doesn’t suddenly mean any implication of physical violence isn’t possible anymore

Then she can say both, right now, it is left unsaid which one it was.

Also, the mere fact that men could outpower women does not necessitate the threat of rape. This is really too broad of a thinking. The threat of rape could happen because he was allegedly inside her home and didn't take no for an answer repeatedly rather than the mere fact he was a man.

Who said threat of rape? It’s the threat of physical violence

And yes the not taking no for an answer is the whole point. I’m not saying just by being a man or being powerful that you’re automatically coercing everyone you meet

I assume said violence entails rape since he already solicits her for sexual advances of some kind.

TL;DR She says Andrew coerced her into doing a non-penetrative sexual act while he was staying the night and she was drunk

And that said coercion happened because he kept asking until she agreed to do whatever it is they did.

Also said she doesn't need to show any texts or images but that she has proof somehow.

Isn’t that basically the definition of the act of coercion lol

And that said coercion happened because he coerced her

Is what you literally just said

ktt2.com/justin-bieber-cancelled-on-twitter-multiple-sexual-assault-70175/35

I mean you can read through this thread. Anybody reserving judgment instead of instantly believing it gets branded as a misogynist. Hindsight is 20/20 of course but this one definitely did not happen.

Thanks but I’m not reading a 2 year old thread when bro is obviously talking about people itt

of course you wouldnt

has hasan said anything