if you can’t figure it out on your own, it’s not worth explaining since you probably agree with his f***ed up views

OP rn

man not the ifunny tag ruining it

This is really helpful to know, thank you

Thank you for breaking this down in such detail

I don't think my friend is gonna go beyond that book so I think he should be good

Yeah he’s thoroughly entertaining lmfao. Watching him debate with all the twitch dweebs is funny af

F*** Andrew tate

But when we gonna start calling Twitch personalities grifters

Idk if that's the right word and I know I'm not saying anything original here

But like that Hasan dude being a millionaire and still taking donations off children just don't sit right with me personally. I'm not saying if u left wing u can't make money but how u gonna call Tate a scammer for selling a course while u a millionaire selling emoji access and s*** to children

It's 2022 but whole concept still so strange to me

worry bout your own bag💯

Regardless of whether he's a grifter how is it a scam, nobody is under the impression that they're getting something out of it besides avoiding ads

Hasan even used to say how to bypass ads with VPN or adblock before twitch made him stop

It's definitely not comparable to Andrew Tate's MLM

It's immoral imo .

Genuine question how is the Tate thing mlm from what I've seen he sell courses and there's just referral codes some people have but there's no need to recruit people. Whole referral / affiliate thing seems like s pretty common marketing strategy these days

Im not defending it just I've read that it's only certain people who even have a referral code so it doesn't seem to fit the MLM criteria because not everyone can even recruit people. Just the whole dumbass buy my course to get rich s*** with an affiliate program

But I might be missing something if u know more

when 2 things are bad it means they’re the same amount of bad

Who said that

The scam is that the course has nothing you can't find for free on youtube basically lol

It's not affiliate marketing either bc that doesn't come with a signup fee or tries to lure you in on a promise to get rich quick

I agree with u but how is it MLM though. Just doesn't seem to fit the definition to me.

How is it not MLM? You pay to get in, and then you get paid by getting other people to join, the guy at the top still makes money off every sale. It's pretty much textbook MLM tbh lol

Most people make most of their money that they do make bc of the course on the commission and not because of whatever they learn from it. You're basically saying because there's a product it's not a MLM, every MLM comes with a product.

From his website:

"This is a community where you will have access to stock a***ysis, options plays, crypto a***ysis, DeFi, E-commerce, Copywriting, Freelancing, Flipping, Real Estate, Financial planning, Affiliate Marketing, Business management and more.

Every professor is verified by me personally. Each one of them is making anywhere from 10k to 500k a month in their select field.

I chose fields that ANYONE ANYWHERE can do NOW to get rich.

No bullshit, no fluff, just hard hitting lessons in making money.

Full resources, full lesson plans, everything you need to get rich and it all starts with you making your first money TODAY."

Bro this is just a classic get rich quick MLM It's so obvious lmao

There's no product being sold and the courses they sell don't rely on u getting other people to join

MLM the basis of it is u gotta get other people to join to make money. But the average member can't even recruit people from what I understand.

It doesn't mean im saying it not basically s money making scam just it not MLM

Damn

Crazy way to admit you suck at reading

Don't view what as morally wrong

No!

jus wanna ask, why is it only people on the “right” that get attacked and called “grifters”?

End of Transmission

the person I was replying to called peterson transphobic and talked about evangelical conservatism

but I've never heard him judge a trans person on their choice, he's just stated the fact that everyone is born either as a male or female

as far as evangelical conservatism goes all I've heard JP do is a***yze biblical figures and situations in a psychological way which is his specialty as a psychiatrist on the interactions between humans and their creator....mostly the old testament

all of the above^ I dont find morally wrong. Quite the opposite actually, he's making important distinctions, for example, people who preach about pride rights but called people gay as an insult before the cancel movement are an offense to em and psychologists/psychiatrists that never studied religion which is the biggest source of philosophy and inner pain/freedom are uneducated.

That's just my opinion tho, but, I'll be damned if I let ppl tell me who to listen to or not without investigating