Obviously, they benefitted from it, but they were all rich well before colonization.
germany had colonies in China, am I wrong?
Yea they had colonies all over, but not nearly to the extent of France and Britain.
Thing is China is worse and they taking USA spot
China definitely not worse than America, France is probably the only coountry that's worse than America when it comes to imposing it's imperial power.
Worse domestically but much better for other countries
Depends tbh, and also for how long will that be when they dominate everything
China definitely not worse than America, France is probably the only coountry that's worse than America when it comes to imposing it's imperial power.
I'm clearly not only talking imperialism
Depends tbh, and also for how long will that be when they dominate everything
Well up til now, China has been very reluctant of intervening in other countries affairs and their trade has been less exploitative in comparison with how the West has operated up until now.
That's why socialism >>>>>>>>
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L136D4Pzo4&ab_channel=MilitaryReportOoo ooo ooo ooo ooo ooo ooo ooo
Ahora SI, Ahora Si 7 8 años despues, ahora si con el rumbo bien claro, ahora si con el conocimiento mas profundo de nuestras realidades, ahora si con una experiencia que se va sumando a la pasion y a la voluntad, AHORA SI CON RUMBO HACIA EL SOCIALISMO, hacia una democracia profunda y plena.
LOS QUE QUIERAN PATRIA VENGAN CONMIGO!!!!!!
ASI SI, AHORA SI, AHORA VAMOS POR EL SI
AHORA VAMOS POR EL SI
SOCIALISMO INCLUSION
SOLIDARIA INVOCACION
SACRIFICIO INTEGRACION
REFORMA Y REVOLUCION
SON UNA MISMA CUESTION
COMO EL PUEBLO Y EL AMOR
INVENCIBLE VOZ DE DIOS
ASI SI, AHORA SI, AHORA VAMOS POR EL SI
LOS QUE QUIERAN PATRIA VENGAN CONMIGO!
A COMENZADO A CAMBIAR! Y TIENE QUE SEGUIR CAMBIANDO, EL PODER ES DEL PUEBLO, EL PODER ES DE LA NACION NO DE LOS OLIGARCAS
AHORA DECIMOS SI, SI , SI, SI
SI, SI, SI, LA HORA DE LOS PUEBLOS
SI, SI, SI, LA HORA DE LOS POBRES
SI, SI SI, DE HOMBRES Y MUJERES
SI, SI, SI, DE LOS TRABAJADORES
CAMPESINOS, TRANSPORTISTAS, MILITARES Y MILICIAS
POLICIAS Y BOMBEROS, COMERCIANTES, MISIONEROS
PETROLEROS, PETROQUIMICOS, CIENTIFICOS Y OBREROS
ENFERMERAS Y DOCTORES, SEMBRADORES, PESCADORES
PROFESORES Y ESTUDIANTES, BARRENDEROS, NAVEGANTES
PELUQUEROS, CARPINTEROS, AFROS, INDIOS, VIGILANTES
SACERDOTES, PERIODISTAS, ZAPATEROS, LOS ARTISTAS
BATALLONES, BRIGADISTAS, VENGAN COOPERATIVISTAS
SI, SI, SI, LA HORA DE LOS PUEBLOS
SI, SI, SI, LA HORA DE LOS POBRES
SI, SI SI, DE HOMBRES Y MUJERES
SI, SI, SI, DE LOS TRABAJADORES
DIVERSIDAD SIN MENOSPRECIO. SI
LOS ESTUDIANTES, LAS MUJERES, LOS TRABAJADORES, LOS INDIGENAS, LOS MILITARES, LOS SOLDADOS, LOS COMBATIENTES, SIIIIII
ASI SI, AHORA SI, AHORA VAMOS POR EL SI
those ppl are not socialist
I'm clearly not only talking imperialism
Colonialism and imperialism go hand in hand, can't have an empire without colonies
The arab spring is a perfect example for modern colonialism (neo-colonialism)
F*** obama, sarkozy etc for this
Just learn how to manufacture the best cars in the world
Germans were colonisers too except they sucked at it. Same applies to Italy
Not really no
They got rich thanks to the industrial revolution and there is no correlation with wealth now and colonies of the past.
Portugal had one of the biggest empires at the time and they invented the atlantic slave trade but now look where they are.
A few european countries are still rich thanks to neocolonialism though. If France lost its power over western africa it would become a third world country in an instant
You got it wrong. The Portuguese ceased to be a colonial power comparable to the British and the French by the turn of the 19th century. So that does not really hold.
As far as the industrial revolution is concerned, countries still relied on looted imports and labour from the colonies in order to sustain themselves in an economic transition where specialisation was underway. In fact, the industrial revolution was the kernel for the Scramble Over Africa and their European expansion in Asia. Before then, the colonisers had little impact in the colonies, but after then the Europeans started to grip harder. Why? Because the industrial revolution led to population growth, which entailed more demand for goods and that in itself led to more profit for the colonisers.
Northern countries never colonized (Norwage for example)
I should've put a '','' between them
This is inaccurate. The Danes have set up show in Africa. The East Danish Company is rarely talked about, because Denmark never wanted to address its colonial legacy
Industrial revolution started before colonialism. It instruem that they have been leeching off of Africa and propping themselves up off the backs of us since the 1870s tho
it didn’t start before colonialism. India had been a colony since mid 18th century. South Africa was colonised in 1652.
This is inaccurate. The Danes have set up show in Africa. The East Danish Company is rarely talked about, because Denmark never wanted to address its colonial legacy
didn't know about that
This is inaccurate. The Danes have set up show in Africa. The East Danish Company is rarely talked about, because Denmark never wanted to address its colonial legacy
Crazy no one knows about the biggest company in history
Crazy no one knows about the biggest company in history
That’s the East India Company
That’s the East India Company
I keep forgetting danish and dutch are not the same thing
I keep forgetting danish and dutch are not the same thing
East India company is British
East India company is British
The dutch one was the biggest company in history not the british one
The dutch one was the biggest company in history not the british one
Could be because of their ships and ports during the height of mercantilism, but the East India Company had the biggest influence across Africa and Asia