Reply
  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    I’m not entirely sure what your argument is now or what our disagreement specifically is

    the point is saying AI is bad for art is overblown because AI is not good and may not ever be good at art and we don’t “deserve better than AI” in music because a lot of mainstream music has been fake even before AI and we let it slide

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    I don’t think human creativity will die out or anything in a hypothetical AI dominated world because people find a lot of self-fulfillment and solace in creating art but I think it’ll become devalued.

    I think the ship has sailed for saving "art" from being devalued in a mainstream pop culture sense, everything that's mainstream pop culture in 2025 is dominated by capital and what can be sold

    I think most people need a little slop to take the edge off reality, if "AI slop" replaces "capitalist slop" it won't have a bearing in my day to day reality enough for me to care, I respect the position but I just can't see it creating a new problem I'll (or artists I hugely respect...) have to deal with

  • Mar 18, 2025
    Rubbersoul

    So paying for streaming or buying the albums isn’t sufficient anymore?

    Streaming has never been sufficient just letting you know crodie

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Valentine

    you said this

    gonna be a sad day when you pick up a new instrument or start taking art classes and your friends think you’re wasting your time when chatgpt can do the “same s***” in 3 seconds.

    that’s where we started. that day can’t even be possible because the AI would still need you the human to direct it step by step to get close to what you want and it will still not be perfect and since the tools are advancing like you said, will be quickly detected

    Not sure what you mean by “step-by-step” because that’s not even required now, atleast not to the extent that I’m thinking of.

    I can open logic pro right now and generate a drum beat of a select genre, a piano part based off a select chord progression, etc etc and you would not be able to discern it from AI whatsoever.

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    Nort

    I don’t think human creativity will die out or anything in a hypothetical AI dominated world because people find a lot of self-fulfillment and solace in creating art but I think it’ll become devalued.

    No it’s gonna be the other away around

    AI art will be devalued because it’s too easy, human art will be the luxury because it takes effort

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    onetwo

    No it’s gonna be the other away around

    AI art will be devalued because it’s too easy, human art will be the luxury because it takes effort

    that is the hope

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    If the music of this time was amazing, sure. But the way s*** is going--AI will probably be a huge improvement

  • Mar 18, 2025
    dardy cinq

    that is the hope

    that’s how everything works anything that’s easily produced automatically has less value

  • Mar 18, 2025
    GodzillaMinusOne

    If the music of this time was amazing, sure. But the way s*** is going--AI will probably be a huge improvement

    lmao lowkey

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    onetwo

    the point is saying AI is bad for art is overblown because AI is not good and may not ever be good at art and we don’t “deserve better than AI” in music because a lot of mainstream music has been fake even before AI and we let it slide

    It’s a philosophical argument on my end, but I think AI generated art is inherently of less value so in that sense, I’d agree it’ll never be “good”.

    but being “good” is not gonna stop it from becoming normalized. You sorta just made this argument for me at the end there.

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Rubbersoul

    I completely agree? And using AI is another thing to add to the list for how everything is going.

    AI is a symptom, not the problem

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    It’s a philosophical argument on my end, but I think AI generated art is inherently of less value so in that sense, I’d agree it’ll never be “good”.

    but being “good” is not gonna stop it from becoming normalized. You sorta just made this argument for me at the end there.

    I think AI assisted art will be normalized but AI generated art with no human touch will never be normalized imo because AI is all left brained and no right and good art is large majority a result of right brained activity

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    Not sure what you mean by “step-by-step” because that’s not even required now, atleast not to the extent that I’m thinking of.

    I can open logic pro right now and generate a drum beat of a select genre, a piano part based off a select chord progression, etc etc and you would not be able to discern it from AI whatsoever.

    you still had to input those things for AI to generate as a human because, again, it doesn’t understand nuance

    it didn’t just have itself ready and you said “i want a 5/6 drum beat with a 3/4 piano over a 4/4 melody and make it sound trap”

    no. that will never happen to where it will generate anything you like as it is going to produce an infinite amount of outputs for you to sift through until you get the one you like when it would have just been quicker as a human to create it yourself and how you desire it to be

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    technological advancement in art is a great thing but there’s a trade-off being had.

    it’s like when we invented the drum machine. Sure, you could argue that you’re cheating yourself by not actually learning drums, but the MPC unlocked a whole new world of music-making. J Dilla is just as, or even more of a musician in my mind than Ringo Starr.

    but what are we getting with AI? You have the convenience of having a finished product without having any of the skillset to do it yourself, in exchange for… ?

    You’re just removing the primary motive and soul behind art in the first place. Hearing a beautiful lyric or viewing a well-composed painting is gonna mean less when it’s all algorithm.

    J Dilla is just as, or even more of a musician in my mind than Ringo Starr.

    (Im a J Dilla fan I just also know mad old
    People)

    Other fellow musicians would kill you for this take and this why a lot of yall “anti AI” niggas is full of s***

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    yesac

    I think the ship has sailed for saving "art" from being devalued in a mainstream pop culture sense, everything that's mainstream pop culture in 2025 is dominated by capital and what can be sold

    I think most people need a little slop to take the edge off reality, if "AI slop" replaces "capitalist slop" it won't have a bearing in my day to day reality enough for me to care, I respect the position but I just can't see it creating a new problem I'll (or artists I hugely respect...) have to deal with

    Sure, I’m just arguing that AI slop will be worse than capitalist slop because atleast the latter has some semblance of human creativity involved.

    but if that’s something of no concern to you, then alright. Life is too hard to care about everything that goes wrong.

  • Mar 18, 2025
    Nort

    Sure, I’m just arguing that AI slop will be worse than capitalist slop because atleast the latter has some semblance of human creativity involved.

    but if that’s something of no concern to you, then alright. Life is too hard to care about everything that goes wrong.

    AI slop = capitalist slop

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    onetwo

    No it’s gonna be the other away around

    AI art will be devalued because it’s too easy, human art will be the luxury because it takes effort

    I think we’ll see eras where we’re both correct.

    AI becoming normalized, then society begins to really value human artistry again after seeing what’s been lost and looks to correct itself.

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    onetwo

    I think AI assisted art will be normalized but AI generated art with no human touch will never be normalized imo because AI is all left brained and no right and good art is large majority a result of right brained activity

    ai assisted art is great but ai generated art is already normalized if we’re talking visual art lol

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Free YoungBoy

    Eventually it will

    No it literally wont.

    AI voices still cant make a ye voice without him having a “russian” accent.

    The thing within all humans is our unpredictability. It’s why there’s no successful AI of southern rappers (that dont heavily rely on autotune) because of the heavy accents we got that AI just never gon really be able to have down to a T.

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Valentine

    you still had to input those things for AI to generate as a human because, again, it doesn’t understand nuance

    it didn’t just have itself ready and you said “i want a 5/6 drum beat with a 3/4 piano over a 4/4 melody and make it sound trap”

    no. that will never happen to where it will generate anything you like as it is going to produce an infinite amount of outputs for you to sift through until you get the one you like when it would have just been quicker as a human to create it yourself and how you desire it to be

    visual artist can do this right now

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    visual artist can do this right now

    and you already established that they are creating tools to detect this so…talented artists will prevail lol

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    insertcoolnamehere

    J Dilla is just as, or even more of a musician in my mind than Ringo Starr.

    (Im a J Dilla fan I just also know mad old
    People)

    Other fellow musicians would kill you for this take and this why a lot of yall “anti AI” niggas is full of s***

    I’m confused on what your point is here. I’m a fan of the beatles and j dilla. I see the value in what they both did.

    but Dilla created a whole new approach to drums so that’s why I’d put him on a higher pedestal.

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    I think we’ll see eras where we’re both correct.

    AI becoming normalized, then society begins to really value human artistry again after seeing what’s been lost and looks to correct itself.

    When I think of artists like Todd Solondz that make truly unique thought provoking movies on shoestring budgets that before AI and after AI can't get funded it becomes crystal clear that the facade of human artistry meaning something under capitalism is and always will be simply that, so on that level I will continue to support and champion artists like that (they'll continue to exist God willing) and the concerns of things like AI will remain in another realm billions of dollars away where it will live in a shallow grave with cryptocurrency and other pointless capitalist bureaucratic bullshit 🙏

  • Nort 💫
    Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Valentine

    and you already established that they are creating tools to detect this so…talented artists will prevail lol

    this is why im so confused on what your argument is

    you say ai cant make artwork that’ll pass as human-made

    i say ai can create artwork that can pass as human-made right now

    and you say we have tools to detect it though so we’re alright

  • Mar 18, 2025
    vingu
    · edited

    dude asked you a question in good faith and you refuse to answer it based on some wording you didn’t like lmfao. and everything you did suggest is not only intrinsically lazy but is built with stolen artwork. ai bootlickers are cringe as f***, can’t wait for all y’all to show your true colors in this thread so i can block yall

    im not even saying that there aren’t potentially benevolent uses for it. it can be neat for audio restoration and hearing an artist’s voice over a song they didn’t make as a fan made neat gimmick is cool sometimes as long as it’s in good taste. but you niggas show how little you care about art on a dime with the way you talk about it and don’t even mean to

    Lmaoo how is generating window glares and clouds based off of stolen artwork? They can’t make their own base assets and want to make thousands of variations? I literally just saw a video where they input their own concept art with the artists permission into the AI to create a town with a matching aesthetic. You so attached to it only being used in a negative way you not thinking clearly

    I answered the question with the generation of assets. Nigga i been making beats and graphics since the Obama era now I dont care about art bc i see how AI can be used as a tool for more creativity. Lmfaooo

1
...
6
7
8
...
15