I haven't seen any legit proof he's associated in any way with the alt right, those claims seem to be more from people that try to discredit him.
And apparently he got hooked on anxiety meds when he was prescribed them to deal with the anxiety of his wife having cancer. I don't really see him going to rehab to fix that as a huge issue, seems like a smart move to make imo

I'm curious, what Nazi propoganda has he actually spouted?

It's literally in the first two sentences

He blames part of the worlds problems on cultural marxists. Cultural Marxism has its roots in Cultural Bolshevism, which is Nazi propaganda.

I linked a Wiki that explained it

Real question is if y’all f*** with Jung and nietszche cause that’s where Peterson’s scope of thinking originated

Yeah I watched one video then read something about an all meat diet. Never clicked off some s*** faster in my life

f*** no

He’s ok in my book haven’t seen anything really bad about him

my nam a jordan peters,on

“Individualism” overrated.. it’s all marketing

Benzo abuse is a real problem. Especially if it’s prescribed by a doctor.

If the explanation you linked that man is the same quality as the one you gave in this post, I'm not surprised that we're all still confused about what the f*** you're talking about.

Lmao what

He’s garbage and got popular by misrepresenting a bill on trans people

F*** him

I f*** with Carl Jung. He definitely studied occult science.

I don't know how it can be more clear

1. Peterson claims that "Cultural Marxists" are the reason for many of the worlds problems

2. The term Cultural Marxists is derived from the term Cultural Bolsheviks

3. Cultural Bolshevism is a Nazi created term/conspiracy theory

Thus, Peterson is repeating Nazi propaganda and conspiracy theory

It takes 3 minutes to the small Wikipedia entry to have a simple understanding of it, it's really not that complicated.

Here's just one quote from the entry

"In Fascism: Fascism and Culture (2003), professor and Oxford fellow Matthew Feldman traced the etymology of the term "Cultural Marxism" back to the anti-Semitic term Kulturbolshewismus (Cultural Bolshevism), which Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party used to assert that Jewish cultural influence was the source of German social degeneration under the liberal régime of the Weimar Republic (1918–1939), and also the cause of social degeneration in the West.64"

Why should anyone take a wikipedia article as evidence within a discussion?

Because the Wikipedia article directly quotes a book about the history of Fascism

Unless we aren't supposed to used books as evidence in a discussion

Quote directly from the book instead

we calling old man peterson a nazi now

while i do disagree with him in certain things i think he’s an extremely articulate person who is very good at debating. he shares a lot of in sights and if his politics bother you that doesn’t mean his psychology are any less insightful. everything he says is extremely well backed up and interesting.

I'm not calling him a Nazi, but he is without a doubt repeating Nazi propaganda. There's a reason why he has such a large alt-right, loser fanbase. He either doesn't know the history of the word, or just doesn't care and continues to use it cause it's an easy buzzword he can use to rile up his fanbase. I'm not sure which is worse.

sorry, i don’t keep up with whatever headlines or news he makes. his lectures can entertaining sometimes and he explains things pretty well. somethings he says might be easy buzzwords that the media will use to paint him a certain way. i’m personally left leaning and find him very informative

That Nazi Propaganda is incorrect anyway. Karl Marx plagiarised the Communist Manifesto from a book written by Clinton Roosevelt in 1841 titled The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law. Roosevelt was an American banker, who also took office in New York and was a staunch communist.

Calling it “Cultural Marxism” is like calling an apple a green worm.