have to wonder if they actually did that themselves or if they were working with a middleman ad agency, because if they were just using google ads and those sites had embedded google ads its not their fault necessarily. if they just straight up looked up those sties to buy ads though then
That still shouldn't be allowed at all lol
What is the underlying construct that leads to libs irrational and disproportionate demonization of cigarettes compared to other d****
Where the SOCIETY PSYCHOANALYSTS at?
I think Zizek said sum about this
Why defend any d**** lol? Smoking specifically is ass because we were close to having a new generation of kids who don't like smoking cigs.
However, tobacco companies always pushed towards kids in any sneaky way with their marketing. The flavored juul was their secret to getting new kids to be hooked onto smoking.
It's f***ed up.
Why defend any d**** lol? Smoking specifically is ass because we were close to having a new generation of kids who don't like smoking cigs.
However, tobacco companies always pushed towards kids in any sneaky way with their marketing. The flavored juul was their secret to getting new kids to be hooked onto smoking.
It's f***ed up.
Why should there be laws against cigs and not against alcohol?
Why should there be laws against cigs and not against alcohol?
Oh, s*** I didn't see it said all cigs
I thought it was just over vaping lol. That's hella weird lol
Oh, s*** I didn't see it said all cigs
I thought it was just over vaping lol. That's hella weird lol
Libs got a weird fetishization of cigs as uniquely bad for some reason
Libs got a weird fetishization of cigs as uniquely bad for some reason
I mean I don't smoke or drink, but cig smell is gross to me
I mean I don't smoke or drink, but cig smell is gross to me
I liked it as a kid i used to walk behind smokers on purpose
crazy how biden suddenly has power when it's to remove nicotine from cigarettes i thought the narrative was that even tho he had all 3 branches of government it still wasnt enough to make a difference
how about ceasing the production/distribution of bullets in america or does he not have enough power to do that either
how about ceasing the production/distribution of bullets in america or does he not have enough power to do that either
Cigarettes aren't protected by the 2nd amendment
Any EOs related to guns will be overturned by Supreme Court in an instant
Stupid regulation
Nicotine isn't the truly harmful component
Why do libs go so hard against cigs tho lol
90% lung cancer comes from smoking
90% lung cancer comes from smoking
Okay and how much death does alcohol cause lol
90% lung cancer comes from smoking
That's the thing though. I know this and I'll still willingly take that risk everytime I light up a cigarette. That's my prerogative. I'm a grown man I don't need the government to protect me from myself
Okay and how much death does alcohol cause lol
Dont know the exact percentage but yeah it can cause a lot of different types of cancer
Idk why there is such a difference in terms of treatment of both. Maybe they better in lobbying
Or it has to do with passive smoking. It causes lung cancer to people who don't smoke but in the same environment. Different for alcohol
That's the thing though. I know this and I'll still willingly take that risk everytime I light up a cigarette. That's my prerogative. I'm a grown man I don't need the government to protect me from myself
I think it's more protecting your environment then. Passive smoking also causes lung cancer. But am not sure