Reply
  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    applesaucy

    Their names are, but if the stimmy bill is anything to prove we know they add a bunch of s*** to obfuscate what theyre signing.

    its not like they're adding bad s*** though... its s*** like funding for schools and infrastructure lol

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Synopsis

    You say this but trump had the most executive orders per year of any of any pres since eisenhower.

    Then its only excelerating, and thats terrible. But we know trump is terrible. You all are grown, do i need to tell you its wrong? Hes a s***ty prez but we know that, that doesn't mean "ok biden follow in his footsteps"

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Gulpin

    its not like they're adding bad s*** though... its s*** like funding for schools and infrastructure lol

    OP is likely a conservative if not a libertarian lol

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    applesaucy

    Then its only excelerating, and thats terrible. But we know trump is terrible. You all are grown, do i need to tell you its wrong? Hes a s***ty prez but we know that, that doesn't mean "ok biden follow in his footsteps"

    ive already told you executive orders are not inherently bad or good lol

  • Feb 2, 2021
    applesaucy

    Ah, but it doesnt f***ing matter because they arent being voted on. Ive already found bullshit and thats just glossing it over

    And if they are unconstitutional, they can be overturned by Congress. They aren’t all-powerful decrees.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Gulpin

    its not like they're adding bad s*** though... its s*** like funding for schools and infrastructure lol

    Is removing the necessity for unions to disclose taxpayer funds good?

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Synopsis

    ive already told you executive orders are not inherently bad or good lol

    The amount is bro, thats my issue

  • Feb 2, 2021
    applesaucy

    The amount is bro, thats my issue

    no.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    applesaucy

    Is removing the necessity for unions to disclose taxpayer funds good?

    how many years of your life did you live without them having to? and thats not even taking into account what this means for bargaining rights lol. it strengthens unions, which is good.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    applesaucy

    Is removing the necessity for unions to disclose taxpayer funds good?

    doesn't sound bad to me

    plus what synopsis said, if it helps unions im for it

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    You can't come into the presidency after Trump and not use this avenue to undo the countless s*** storms that he created

  • applesaucy

    Then its only excelerating, and thats terrible. But we know trump is terrible. You all are grown, do i need to tell you its wrong? Hes a s***ty prez but we know that, that doesn't mean "ok biden follow in his footsteps"

    democrats been playing the "they go low, we go high" game for decades and lost because of it.

    S*** is different now.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    applesaucy

    The amount is bro, thats my issue

    I already said this FDR issued over 3700 EO’s while helping us out of the Great Depression and WWII. EO’s aren’t inherently good or bad, the amount of them needs to be looked at in relation to the time period we are in.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Synopsis

    how many years of your life did you live without them having to? and thats not even taking into account what this means for bargaining rights lol. it strengthens unions, which is good.

    So, if unions were using the money for embezzlement and things not related to strengthening the workers, yknow, like a lot of them do (i know, working retail), its ok for them to use taxpayer funds and not tell anyone?

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    5 replies
    k dog 99

    I already said this FDR issued over 3700 EO’s while helping us out of the Great Depression and WWII. EO’s aren’t inherently good or bad, the amount of them needs to be looked at in relation to the time period we are in.

    FDR was also the only president to exploit term limits to have 4 terms, dying in office of old age. Hes a horrible example as he was more dictatorish then any president weve had in the modern era. Also more terms means more opportunity for EQs

    Not to mention his "green new deal" causing the great depression to get so bad in the first place

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    Just admit you don't agree w/ who is behind the executive orders and stop wasting our time, lol.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    Synopsis

    OP is likely a conservative if not a libertarian lol

    Im not apart of no groups, i see what i see and call out what i see

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    applesaucy

    FDR was also the only president to exploit term limits to have 4 terms, dying in office of old age. Hes a horrible example as he was more dictatorish then any president weve had in the modern era. Also more terms means more opportunity for EQs

    Not to mention his "green new deal" causing the great depression to get so bad in the first place

    There weren’t term limits until after FDR

    FDR is listed with Lincoln and Washington as one of the best presidents so

  • Feb 2, 2021
    applesaucy

    So, if unions were using the money for embezzlement and things not related to strengthening the workers, yknow, like a lot of them do (i know, working retail), its ok for them to use taxpayer funds and not tell anyone?

    lmaoo

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    JaeRell

    Just admit you don't agree w/ who is behind the executive orders and stop wasting our time, lol.

    I will not have you all turn this into some bullshit "dem vs repub" non-debate that solves nothing and washes away the inital argument. Y'all trying your hardest to turn it into that and its sad

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    applesaucy

    I will not have you all turn this into some bullshit "dem vs repub" non-debate that solves nothing and washes away the inital argument. Y'all trying your hardest to turn it into that and its sad

    You have turned this into a bullshit dem vs repub debate yourself, you're just masking it

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    k dog 99

    There weren’t term limits until after FDR

    FDR is listed with Lincoln and Washington as one of the best presidents so

    I know there was no term limits, thats why i said he exploted it. It was something that, before him, was just assumed.

    And FDR was no best president

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    applesaucy

    I will not have you all turn this into some bullshit "dem vs repub" non-debate that solves nothing and washes away the inital argument. Y'all trying your hardest to turn it into that and its sad

    Your initial argument is dumb. What is "too many" executive orders? What arbitrary number would you like to come up with?

    We have a system in place that can overturn executive orders. Congress and The Supreme Court have that power. And if the next President disagrees, he has the ability to overturn them.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    shane

    You have turned this into a bullshit dem vs repub debate yourself, you're just masking it

    How sway? Read my OP again, i mention both trump AND obama. I attacked both dems and repub all throughout this thread, ive made my position clear, i said i was apart of no groups and admonished both trump and biden.

  • Feb 2, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    JaeRell

    Your initial argument is dumb. What is "too many" executive orders? What arbitrary number would you like to come up with?

    We have a system in place that can overturn executive orders. Congress and The Supreme Court have that power. And if the next President disagrees, he has the ability to overturn them.

    Oh yes, and then that next president can flood his own EQs right? Thats great, thats how its always been, we love how its always been, that's why America is so good

1
...
3
4
5
...
9