Reply
  • Apr 12, 2020

    It's xenophobic to call it the Chinese virus, it has a medical name already.

    Stop fighting to be a bigot freely.

  • blase 🦋
    Apr 12, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    If you're actively trying to change the name from a racially neutral one like "COVID19" to a racialized one like "Chinese virus", you're obviously just a racist and simply rationalizing your bigotry by comparing it to other diseases, when those situations are obviously different since they were given those names at the beginning.

    (Except for Spanish flu, for which the name was the result of an American propaganda campaign to cover up for the fact that the virus came from Kansas.)

    One of the first name it was given, if not the first was "Wuhun Coronavirus" when it hit the US in January.

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Scratchin Mamba

    If you're actively trying to change the name from a racially neutral one like "COVID19" to a racialized one like "Chinese virus", you're obviously just a racist and simply rationalizing your bigotry by comparing it to other diseases, when those situations are obviously different since they were given those names at the beginning.

    (Except for Spanish flu, for which the name was the result of an American propaganda campaign to cover up for the fact that the virus came from Kansas.)

    IIRC spanish flu was a propaganda campaign by essentially every country

    A bunch of countries denied that they had infected civilians except for Spain who admitted it

    So other countries turned around and acted like it started in Spain as a result

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    blase

    One of the first name it was given, if not the first was "Wuhun Coronavirus" when it hit the US in January.

    I know that people mentioned that it came from Wuhan but I'm not aware of any organization calling it the Wuhan virus

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ROVO

    IIRC spanish flu was a propaganda campaign by essentially every country

    A bunch of countries denied that they had infected civilians except for Spain who admitted it

    So other countries turned around and acted like it started in Spain as a result

    This is true, although iirc recent research supports that spanish flu originated in a Kansas chicken farm.

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ROVO

    IIRC spanish flu was a propaganda campaign by essentially every country

    A bunch of countries denied that they had infected civilians except for Spain who admitted it

    So other countries turned around and acted like it started in Spain as a result

    Multiple countries were in on it, but the US had a particularly big role in it since it came from Kansas.

  • Apr 12, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    I know that people mentioned that it came from Wuhan but I'm not aware of any organization calling it the Wuhan virus

    Prof. Dr. med. Alex Jones might have called it that in one of his recent press conferences

  • Apr 12, 2020

    it’s not rly racist to call it china coronavirus but it isn’t hard to just call it covid-19 lmao

  • Apr 12, 2020

    no one's stopping you from calling it chinese virus bro you can force racial context into whatever you want

    it's just something normal people don't bother doing

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Why are white people so hellbent on calling it the Chinese virus?

    Swear y’all go outta your way to be racist

  • Apr 12, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    If you're actively trying to change the name from a racially neutral one like "COVID19" to a racialized one like "Chinese virus", you're obviously just a racist and simply rationalizing your bigotry by comparing it to other diseases, when those situations are obviously different since they were given those names at the beginning.

    (Except for Spanish flu, for which the name was the result of an American propaganda campaign to cover up for the fact that the virus came from Kansas.)

    This

    Stop being racist

    It isn’t that hard..... well I guess it is since y’all continue to think racism is okay

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    ROVO

    Because it already has a name

    It’s not comparable to Ebola or MERS bc that was the name given to them off top. If it was called China Virus off top it’d be fine. And no one is denying it came from China

    But it has a formal name. It has an informal name. Neither is China Virus, and continuing to insist on calling it China Virus seems racially driven, otherwise what’s the point? Why not just call it by the name given to it like a sane human?

    Actually, it was being referred as “Chinese Coronavirus” and “Wuhan virus/Wuhan Coronavirus” months earlier before we started used COVID-19. Once Trump started using it is when it became an issue.

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Flosh
    · edited

    Actually, it was being referred as “Chinese Coronavirus” and “Wuhan virus/Wuhan Coronavirus” months earlier before we started used COVID-19. Once Trump started using it is when it became an issue.

    the leader of the free world racializing a pandemic may be a bigger deal than you realize

  • Apr 12, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    If you're actively trying to change the name from a racially neutral one like "COVID19" to a racialized one like "Chinese virus", you're obviously just a racist and simply rationalizing your bigotry by comparing it to other diseases, when those situations are obviously different since they were given those names at the beginning.

    (Except for Spanish flu, for which the name was the result of an American propaganda campaign to cover up for the fact that the virus came from Kansas.)

  • Apr 12, 2020
    bagool

    the leader of the free world racializing a pandemic may be a bigger deal than you realize

    What I’m saying is simple. At the beginning, it was called Wuhan/Chinese Coronavirus. Trump then calling it Chinese/Wuhan Coronavirus was not “racializing” it as it followed standard protocol for naming viruses via their origin. Is he renaming it now in an attempt to racialize in order to shift blame onto the Chinese government? Yes, didn’t argue that.

  • Apr 12, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Two very valid opposing arguments to this imo.

    As your link points out it’s not at all uncommon for a disease to be named after it’s (presumed or real) location of origin. So in that sense this disease being named after China or Wuhan wouldn’t break with normal naming conventions, so in theory couldn’t be offensive or racist.

    However, when new concepts/things appear in the world, they are usually referred to either by a technical/ official name, or some other name that falls into the public conscience and becomes the standard accepted nomenclature.

    Examples - ISIS / Islamic State being used much more commonly in the West than ISIL or Daesh. Brexit becoming the commonly used word for UK’s process of leaving the EU - this media coined phrase becomes so ubiquitous that it’s effectively used as the official term by the Government as well.

    In regard to this virus, afaik from the very outset in the West this has been referred to as either Covid(-19) which is the technical term, or more commonly Coronavirus - this doesn’t really make sense but has become the common phrase in public and media, so is generally accepted.

    While there’s been no attempt to cover up the fact that it started in Wuhan, at no point has any name for this disease mentioning a location been used as a technical term, or filtered in to the public as an everyday term. So in this context, suddenly adding in a reference to China, repeatedly and deliberately - seems like a concerted effort to change the narrative and create some sort of tension / attribute some blame to China. This is particularly true as the attempts to shoehorn this in don’t come in any official capacity (like trying to call it “Chinese Acute Respiratory Syndrome”), but are just labelling it “the Chinese virus”.

    So in that context you open the door for public anger, bigotry and mistrust towards China as a country. If you (I.e Trump) have any shred of common sense, it will be clear that this risks having a knock on effect of the same s*** being directed by stupid people to people of Chinese (or other Asian) descent within the US

    TL;DR naming a disease after a place isn’t in itself racist, but the way Trump has gone about it seems a deliberate move to break with convention in order to assign blame and stir up bigotry and hostility towards China, opening the door for the same to happen to Chinese (or more generally East Asian) people within the US.

  • Apr 12, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    If you're actively trying to change the name from a racially neutral one like "COVID19" to a racialized one like "Chinese virus", you're obviously just a racist and simply rationalizing your bigotry by comparing it to other diseases, when those situations are obviously different since they were given those names at the beginning.

    (Except for Spanish flu, for which the name was the result of an American propaganda campaign to cover up for the fact that the virus came from Kansas.)

  • Apr 12, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    If you're actively trying to change the name from a racially neutral one like "COVID19" to a racialized one like "Chinese virus", you're obviously just a racist and simply rationalizing your bigotry by comparing it to other diseases, when those situations are obviously different since they were given those names at the beginning.

    (Except for Spanish flu, for which the name was the result of an American propaganda campaign to cover up for the fact that the virus came from Kansas.)

    Perfect comment. I’d also point out how stupid it is when people say the Chinese virus stuff isn’t racist because we call it Spanish Flu - that name was coined over 100 years ago, so the two really aren’t comparable.

  • Apr 12, 2020
    Swz3000

    Two very valid opposing arguments to this imo.

    As your link points out it’s not at all uncommon for a disease to be named after it’s (presumed or real) location of origin. So in that sense this disease being named after China or Wuhan wouldn’t break with normal naming conventions, so in theory couldn’t be offensive or racist.

    However, when new concepts/things appear in the world, they are usually referred to either by a technical/ official name, or some other name that falls into the public conscience and becomes the standard accepted nomenclature.

    Examples - ISIS / Islamic State being used much more commonly in the West than ISIL or Daesh. Brexit becoming the commonly used word for UK’s process of leaving the EU - this media coined phrase becomes so ubiquitous that it’s effectively used as the official term by the Government as well.

    In regard to this virus, afaik from the very outset in the West this has been referred to as either Covid(-19) which is the technical term, or more commonly Coronavirus - this doesn’t really make sense but has become the common phrase in public and media, so is generally accepted.

    While there’s been no attempt to cover up the fact that it started in Wuhan, at no point has any name for this disease mentioning a location been used as a technical term, or filtered in to the public as an everyday term. So in this context, suddenly adding in a reference to China, repeatedly and deliberately - seems like a concerted effort to change the narrative and create some sort of tension / attribute some blame to China. This is particularly true as the attempts to shoehorn this in don’t come in any official capacity (like trying to call it “Chinese Acute Respiratory Syndrome”), but are just labelling it “the Chinese virus”.

    So in that context you open the door for public anger, bigotry and mistrust towards China as a country. If you (I.e Trump) have any shred of common sense, it will be clear that this risks having a knock on effect of the same s*** being directed by stupid people to people of Chinese (or other Asian) descent within the US

    TL;DR naming a disease after a place isn’t in itself racist, but the way Trump has gone about it seems a deliberate move to break with convention in order to assign blame and stir up bigotry and hostility towards China, opening the door for the same to happen to Chinese (or more generally East Asian) people within the US.

    By the time the West took the pandemic seriously, the WHO already renamed the virus officially to Covid-19 back in mid February in order to destigmatize, but if you were to search “Wuhan virus January” or December, you will find that western media outlets were calling it as such.

    I completely agree with you though. Trump’s attempt to rename it back to Wuhan virus/Chinese virus is a blatant attempt to shift blame towards China and that comes with the cost of growing racial tensions and xenophobia towards asian Americans in this country.

  • ROVO

    I guess you have the moral ground then

    But I’m certainly not condemning someone for eating bats when I eat pork

    you should, since bats are fantastic incubators for several different types of viruses..

    It's not an issue of cultural relativism when one of the animals being consumed has evolved in such a way to coexist with pathogens and when other "edible" animals (e.g. civets and pangolins), have unregulated diets that may include bat dropping-contaminated fruit or bat carrion.

  • Apr 12, 2020

    How does making these sweeping generalisations help anything?

  • Apr 13, 2020
    Nozuka

    Why are white people so hellbent on calling it the Chinese virus?

    Swear y’all go outta your way to be racist

  • rvi 🐸
    Apr 13, 2020

    i dont get the benefit of changing the name to "chinese virus"