Ironic

Like I said for the 10th time, there’s many peer reviewed empirical-based evidence studies out there which debunk many of the statement Sowell has made over the years.

It is a simple as using Google scholar or universities Library database and searching Sowell and the relevant topic of economics

Seriously just Google his stances on tax rates, public housing, or affordable healthcare and then you can see what opposing research says.

What the hell going on in here

What basis do you have to say it doesn’t exist.

It’s hilarious because if I told this guy that most Faculty people at the University of Chicago do not accept Milton Friedman viewpoints anymore he’d nevet want to hear that.

Milton Friedman who Sowell undoubtedly followed and was influenced by to a very significant extent

F*** U of C

But this is fundamentally untrue also on the basic that everything he says aligns with
Current and past (and assumed future)
Collective historical and anthropological opinions from their OWN respective means of academia authority.

You can’t bring up a single point that refutes anything he’s said,
You haven’t this whole time.
It’s just vague generalities to urge others to be as lost as you.

Yeah these yenowa and jake fellas needa bounce up outta here lol

Things such as asymmetry of information, ecological impacts unforeseen in long runs, and constant emerging evidence about the disapproval of the efficient market hypothesis Continue to make people like Sowell and 20th century contemporaries look like a joke

You’re embarrassing yourself at this point just stop.

Lol you’re a lowlife racist loser

Again, a vague statement;

And connected with no other argument

Most colleges are handing out 80%
useless and soon to be replaced or “critiqued” degrees - even if that was true it
Doesnt show anything but economic incentive to indoctrinate a more socially valued investment.

Ironic

I would say the University of Chicago school has made some strides people like professor Luigis Zengales Are good examples of honest free market proponents who ecognize where the school is wrong

Provide an example of what they think or have said that proves that statement.

I have 0 idea what you guys are arguing about, I just hate U of C because that was one of the only schools I didn’t get into

UIUC >>>

Who the hell are these niggas

LOL buddy it’s most of the economic faculty that disagree, because they know research has been proving their former
prevailing views as incorrect.

By virtue of the fact that the school of thought coming out of the University of Chicago has shifted should tell you enough. The same school mind you that modernized and disseminated the free market ideas adopted in the 20th century.

If you listen to me and take a look at the research yourself and go looking for it you’d be able to find it like I told you 13 times while you yelled it doesn’t exist it’s not hard

Goodbye

Sure reading is fundamental, but not everything is worth reading and doesn't deserve a book as reference right away.
Like most subjects on this earth, things can be engaged in a very simple introductory manner initially. We can refer to more material if we want to go deeper.
All of these movements where the response is a link right away when asked a question are very suspect. Basically means that the defenders barely understand what they're defending themselves.

Are you black though ?

If not your argument is not welcome here. You can read silently or participate constructively by adding to the conversation.

This is not a place for white people to debate anything related to black empowerment.

Make another thread for that.

Happens every time. Just put him on ignore.

100 % facts.

Glad you see it that way.

Facts.

Dunno why bro still talking to him.