Eazy or EzP

5y

I still don't really understand this argument, why do people act as if they're guaranteed to lose after they win a game or two? To me it sounds less like an issue of SBMM and more of an issue of not being a consistent player or confirmation bias when someone has one or two "good games" out of ten

I had a 2+ KD for the majority of the time I played and I never won a match (or a few matches) and felt like I was guaranteed to lose the next few. I did have matches where I did worse, everyone does as you can't win them all, but I felt like it was less of an issue of SBMM and more of an occurance of natural variance (team skill, team loadouts, maps, SBMM calibration which isn't not necesarilly a bad thing, etc.,)

This is the first new era CoD I've owned but I always heard about how people didn't like SBMM, but when I actually played the game it just seemed like people wanted to have easier high K/D games instead of playing against people who will actually make it difficult for them. It's just very odd coming from a fighting game background where we want things like SBMM, at LEAST a very moderate version of it, as we are constantly looking for ways to make it easier for casual and new players to enjoy our games

Eric C

5y

this the first COD to put you in a different lobby after every game? Cause that’s big trash.

branmalt

5y

the days of rolling every lobby until you hit a clan are over, not a bad thing necessarily

branmalt

5y

the days of rolling every lobby until you hit a clan are over, not a bad thing necessarily

Eric C

5y

just hate playing in a lobby with a solid team in domination where they take objectives, then the next game your team doesn’t take any objectives and they get completely decimated

Eazy or EzP

5y

I still don't really understand this argument, why do people act as if they're guaranteed to lose after they win a game or two? To me it sounds less like an issue of SBMM and more of an issue of not being a consistent player or confirmation bias when someone has one or two "good games" out of ten

I had a 2+ KD for the majority of the time I played and I never won a match (or a few matches) and felt like I was guaranteed to lose the next few. I did have matches where I did worse, everyone does as you can't win them all, but I felt like it was less of an issue of SBMM and more of an occurance of natural variance (team skill, team loadouts, maps, SBMM calibration which isn't not necesarilly a bad thing, etc.,)

This is the first new era CoD I've owned but I always heard about how people didn't like SBMM, but when I actually played the game it just seemed like people wanted to have easier high K/D games instead of playing against people who will actually make it difficult for them. It's just very odd coming from a fighting game background where we want things like SBMM, at LEAST a very moderate version of it, as we are constantly looking for ways to make it easier for casual and new players to enjoy our games

macclesfield

5y

nah i agree sbmm is needed in all competitive games like this but it's just too sensitive this year. previous cods had nowhere near this amount and i feel like too many people are talking about it for it to be just completely made up

DoubleO 5

5y

my issue with sbmm this year is that im put in lobbies where i’m carrying the load on my team with kills and objectives while the opposing team has like 3-4 dominant players

Eric C

5y

this the first COD to put you in a different lobby after every game? Cause that’s big trash.

Soo Diff

5y

This s*** is stupid because they can easily fix it with a ranked mode. Let the casuals play casually and the sweats can try hard against other sweats.

BVL

5y

there is a ranked mode lol

BVL

5y

there is a ranked mode lol

UIP

5y

somebody liked that post too

Yevin

5y

grinding these cigma double kills then im onto the rpg and i got dm

Strung Out

5y

If they dont get LC10s out of league man