Right
and the fact is social relations don't exist in a vacuum free of economic relations or class status so my point is that when people say democrats need to do something to address these problems because without doing that more men will fall into some sort of alt-right fascist pipeline, my response is what my post said; they aren't going to do that because they don't believe in the type of solutions that would be necessary.
sorry, misunderstood your post. yeah, i agree with you. i also wasn't trying to talk about it in a sense of democrats vs republicans, just general public discourse.
sorry, misunderstood your post. yeah, i agree with you. i also wasn't trying to talk about it in a sense of democrats vs republicans, just general public discourse.
yeah i didn't even really read the whole discussion i just always see on twitter ppl saying democrats have "abandoned men" when in reality they've largely abandoned both men and women (and its not like republicans give af about either) but they just happen to be pro-choice so it doesn't "feel" like they've abandoned women
at least thats howd id view it in very basic terms
also people get weird about the whole thing since mens issues are, if we just view the issues completely detached from anyone wider social/economic structures, created by men so the whole discourse on it is just wild
Right
and the fact is social relations don't exist in a vacuum free of economic relations or class status so my point is that when people say democrats need to do something to address these problems because without doing that more men will fall into some sort of alt-right fascist pipeline, my response is what my post said; they aren't going to do that because they don't believe in the type of solutions that would be necessary.
I also mentioned the alt-right pipeline earlier, or rather right wing grifters, and the fact that the left has failed on the 'men' front, and want to clarify that I wasn't implying "the democrats need to do something" or that they would be capable of coming up with an adequate solution in that party.
I’m parked right behind u. Going in to tell your boss you’re posting right wing conspircies on the clock bud
bro dropping plates too lol
bro dropping plates too lol
To be clear yall that’s just some random old dude no one is being doxxed
I also mentioned the alt-right pipeline earlier, or rather right wing grifters, and the fact that the left has failed on the 'men' front, and want to clarify that I wasn't implying "the democrats need to do something" or that they would be capable of coming up with an adequate solution in that party.
yeah like i said didnt really even read the thread lol
the only real solution is improving the material conditions of the people and if nothing else allowing people to make a living.
when people don't have their needs met, they naturally look for reasons to explain why that is.
thats where the grifters come in
To be clear yall that’s just some random old dude no one is being doxxed
See bro you're practicing ageism right now and its triggering my old people tendencies
yeah i didn't even really read the whole discussion i just always see on twitter ppl saying democrats have "abandoned men" when in reality they've largely abandoned both men and women (and its not like republicans give af about either) but they just happen to be pro-choice so it doesn't "feel" like they've abandoned women
at least thats howd id view it in very basic terms
also people get weird about the whole thing since mens issues are, if we just view the issues completely detached from anyone wider social/economic structures, created by men so the whole discourse on it is just wild
i basically agree with you and appreciate the balanced response
See bro you're practicing ageism right now and its triggering my old people tendencies
No one’s speaking to old men’s problems!
The smartest people I know, support Donald Trump for President.
Surround tobef0und round accelerationists, ima do what it takes
yall are both pointlessly fighting tbh
lmao you lowkey on his side and you still havent said anything about the Philosophers and Sociologists I pointed to
I am at work we on OT
Being Chronically online doesnt mean you not outside. It means that the internet bleeds into every crevice of your personality. You cant help but feed the internet more attention until it consumes you.
Why are you posting pictures of a protest when that isnt the point?
We know that American Fash is both parties but my argument is that one is worse because one candidate had a Nazi Rally sunday.
Im not saying vote for Kamala but I am saying to opposed Trump at all times.
Being Chronically online doesnt mean you not outside. It means that the internet bleeds into every crevice of your personality. You cant help but feed the internet more attention until it consumes you.
Why are you posting pictures of a protest when that isnt the point?
We know that American Fash is both parties but my argument is that one is worse because one candidate had a Nazi Rally sunday.
Im not saying vote for Kamala but I am saying to opposed Trump at all times.
enjoy the election
I am opposed to Trump but Trump represents America and the only way for America to make progress is for America to reconcile that it is a racist, rapist, country with bases world wide which vote blue no matter who will only reconcile with Trump as President.
Trump is playing the ignorant and you said he would be in jail begin coping before next week
you can keep making it seem like I am pro trump because you fear hearing you may suffer
if Kamala wins I wouldnt be shocked to see a false flag from "disgruntled palestinians " or "muslims"
to further justify the inhumanity
You lack the ability to grasp a concept to again grasp your pen and fill out your ballot
I am opposed to Trump but Trump represents America and the only way for America to make progress is for America to reconcile that it is a racist, rapist, country with bases world wide which vote blue no matter who will only reconcile with Trump as President.
Trump is playing the ignorant and you said he would be in jail begin coping before next week
why didnt that happen when trump won the first time
lmao you lowkey on his side and you still havent said anything about the Philosophers and Sociologists I pointed to
what about them? Fanon writing about the chauvanistic effects of British colonialism on Chinese boxer men is not "highlighting male issues", he's writing about the psychological effects of colonialism on the proletariat.
and im not "on his side", he's right. youre being annoying and handwringing about trump. its obnoxious.