vox.com/platform/amp/21534338/chile-constitution-plebiscite-vote-pinochet
Could you see the US doing this?
No because admitting them crackers laws were not meant for this world would cause a panic
"That pain was basically enshrined in Pinochet’s constitution. His regime made the neoliberal, free market economic model the law of the land, leading to, among other things, the privatization of education, health care, and pensions. Those policies (and then later, democratization) helped the country become one of the most prosperous and stable in the region.
But politicians on the left and right failed to address the rampant inequality those same policies also produced."
lol maybe if your county is dealing with rampant inequality it isn't exactly prosperous
Also, no the US will never do this voluntarily. that much is obvious
Maybe not right now because it's the stubborn, uninformed old heads who are running the country but the next generation is luckily smarter and will push for it.
Maybe not right now because it's the stubborn, uninformed old heads who are running the country but the next generation is luckily smarter and will push for it.
Lol
It would take a mass movement to see the US confronting climate change, those in power won't do s***
Maybe not right now because it's the stubborn, uninformed old heads who are running the country but the next generation is luckily smarter and will push for it.
Lmao no, it will not
The US profits too much off of destroying the climate
The US military alone pollutes more than 140 countries combined
Title made me realize I spend too much time on Twitter…
LMFAOO
It took me a second I was like wait huh then I realized it was talking about the location and I just
These old ass conservatives would die by those very basic ideals set in the 1700s. The last thing they will do is admit our foundation is flawed. They would rather blame everyone in it than the establishment
The US military alone pollutes more than 140 countries combined
She was joined by Oliver Belcher with the same response. No, the military isn’t a bigger polluter than 140 countries combined—but the key word changing the truth here is "combined."
If you look at where it ranks on the list, the US military is a bigger polluter than about 140 countries. So the claim added one word, ‘COMBINED’ which makes it false.
She was joined by Oliver Belcher with the same response. No, the military isn’t a bigger polluter than 140 countries combined—but the key word changing the truth here is "combined."
If you look at where it ranks on the list, the US military is a bigger polluter than about 140 countries. So the claim added one word, ‘COMBINED’ which makes it false.
when did u become such a bootlicker lmfao
She was joined by Oliver Belcher with the same response. No, the military isn’t a bigger polluter than 140 countries combined—but the key word changing the truth here is "combined."
If you look at where it ranks on the list, the US military is a bigger polluter than about 140 countries. So the claim added one word, ‘COMBINED’ which makes it false.
mega semantics
She was joined by Oliver Belcher with the same response. No, the military isn’t a bigger polluter than 140 countries combined—but the key word changing the truth here is "combined."
If you look at where it ranks on the list, the US military is a bigger polluter than about 140 countries. So the claim added one word, ‘COMBINED’ which makes it false.
Okay well that's still f***ing insane lmao