I'd ask for proof but even then, does that actually make them wrong?

Show proof if you want to though

he admits it himself twitter.com/EliotHiggins/status/828554441485869056?s=20

If you dismiss the Grayzone because you believe them to be Russian assets (idk where this comes from) then why can't you say the same for Bellingcat?

Blumenthal has been to the kremlin and corresponded with russian state officials

I dont trust the grayzone simply because we already have proof of russian disinformation efforts impacting our elections, it is absolutely plausible that theyd want to take a few steps further and hit us with disinformation. Bellingcat is actually journalism. Additionally, being funed by the NED isnt as strong a tie as having literally been to the kremlin

I need Grayzone to update their website though because that s*** looks like a conspiracy website lmao

theguardian.com/world/gallery/2009/jul/06/russia-obama-administration

Barack visited the Kremlim, he might be a Russian asset too

Democrats like to blame Russia for losing in 2016 because they're arrogant and it's easier than admitting they f***ed up - it really isn't that big of a deal

I didnt say that, I said russia was active doing disinformation, I didnt say democrats lost only because of it

every country does disinformation though

Obviously Russia and Syria benefit from an "anti-West" narrative, but that doesn't mean that everything critical of the West is a Russian op

Not only dies the grayzone criticise the west, it outright defends russia at every juncture. It's a a pathetic publication

only because they seek to act as a counterweight to the 99.9% of the media who are craving conflict with Russia

it's basically playing devil's advocate and challenging the incessant propaganda that people get given everywhere else in the media

like nobody on the left actually likes Putin and Assad, we just don't think that it's up to the West to replace them because

a. it's not their place to do
b. whoever they replace them with will be someone who suits their own interests and not the interests of Russia/Syria

I mean let's be honest Russia kind of sucks s*** like I dont know how plainly I have to speak but it ain't america putting gay people in prison or annexing parts of its neighbour. Like maybe people dont like russia because Russia is dislikable

Is it really propaganda if at every turn you make yourself look like a sitcom dictatorship

the U.S is allies with countries that do far worse.

Plus you have to wonder how the Russians feel - surrounded by U.S military bases and their "enemies" have kept NATO (even though it was formed against the Warsaw Pact, which Russia has dissolved)

Obviously that doesn't justify their actions but I think it's something important to consider

Didn't Joe Biden just shrug this off?

Yeah saudi Arabia can go suck a f*** too

Love that from Canada

google.com/amp/s/www.politico.eu/article/holocaust-survivors-urge-boris-johnson-to-stand-up-for-uighurs-as-genocide-law-fight-resumes/amp

Holocaust survivors urging the uk government

No one cares about the Christians getting killed in Armenia huh

Armenia is a christian country, you're thinking of azerbaijan, and also I care

After Nanking massacre how can China do this? I truly hope history doesn’t repeat itself with China taking Japan’s place with this.

No i am thinking of Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh is ancient Armenian land located in the midst of a islamic dictatorship run by a oil hungry blood sucker.

Wont share it here

Over on r/neoliberal theres 2 great posts debunking the genocide denial talking points

It doesnt matter the source, it's important and true

google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-asia-china-56250915

Even more proof