Dec 19, 2019
MrYeezyRealistic reaction tbh if u stuck in the 5th dimension
Not hating it just gets funny after awhile idk.
- Dec 19, 2019·1 reply
hoopsplayer21im sorry wahi :(. Visually and sonically its unbelievably beautiful, truly astounding. but the entire premise of the movie did nothing to build on what blade runner created. we asked ourselves with the original, "wow, this differentiation between man and robot is crazy, who is to say one does not feel pain and understand life and one does", and 2049 does not do much to extend that question further and make us ask similar questions to ourselves.
they answered this by creating a story about a replicant who miraculously gives birth to a child
- Dec 19, 2019
I’m not gone let y’all slander Denis in a thread I’m active in. Dune coming REAL SOON my niggas...just wait on it
- Dec 19, 2019MrYeezy
They make the worst movies imaginable. It’s as bad as faux art bullshit like Birdman
They don’t know how to film any action sequence and their brand of filmmaking has zero stakes to it
What’s it like being a pseudo-intellectual film kid who can’t enjoy anything and doesn’t have a soul...
Also, how are you alive right now?
- Dec 19, 2019·edited·1 replyFlyMx
they answered this by creating a story about a replicant who miraculously gives birth to a child
I don’t think it’s as ‘deep’ of a question the first movie poses. yes so a replicant has birth, so what? it adds a minor caveat to the original question without really asking us anything more. the idea of a replicant having a baby is a minor extension on our concept of a replicant, an extension that, after the first movie, we probably could have inferred was possible just by the nature of the human like qualities the replicants possess. it’s also type cheap don’t you think. it’s like they were thinking to themselves, “how can we can build on this dichotomy between human and replicant even more” and thought “hmmmm let’s just have one give birth”... its not very provocative.
edit: made it more concise.
Dec 19, 2019If Time isn't involved in a major film is a Nolan film
OPDec 19, 2019
WFHTime travel
Real f***ing nice Chris real original
every nolan movie deals with time in some degree why are you surprised
- Dec 19, 2019
- Dec 19, 2019·1 replyhoopsplayer21
I don’t think it’s as ‘deep’ of a question the first movie poses. yes so a replicant has birth, so what? it adds a minor caveat to the original question without really asking us anything more. the idea of a replicant having a baby is a minor extension on our concept of a replicant, an extension that, after the first movie, we probably could have inferred was possible just by the nature of the human like qualities the replicants possess. it’s also type cheap don’t you think. it’s like they were thinking to themselves, “how can we can build on this dichotomy between human and replicant even more” and thought “hmmmm let’s just have one give birth”... its not very provocative.
edit: made it more concise.
But I think that’s part of our “job” or the fun as an audience to fill in the blanks. I just don’t know how much more they could’ve expanded on the idea of existentialism and what it means to be human without looking almost identical to the first film, which I don’t believe it is. This feels like a natural progression from the first.
- Dec 20, 2019·editedFlyMx
But I think that’s part of our “job” or the fun as an audience to fill in the blanks. I just don’t know how much more they could’ve expanded on the idea of existentialism and what it means to be human without looking almost identical to the first film, which I don’t believe it is. This feels like a natural progression from the first.
i agree very much so with your point, but in that i believe for that very reason the movie is unnecessary (while still being a thoroughly enjoyable, beautiful, incredibly sounding movie, with really nice performances from Gosling and De Armas)
- Dec 20, 2019
It's too bad she couldn't live, but then again who does
Dec 20, 2019·3 repliesIt's crazy how you instantly know it's a Nolan film/trailer lol
- Dec 20, 2019Wahi
It's crazy how you instantly know it's a Nolan film/trailer lol
- Dec 20, 2019
the music in this gonna go so crazy
Dec 20, 2019Trailer already has over 2 million views
this is gonna be huge 
Dec 20, 2019in ... Picuture Only ..
Dec 20, 2019Look HARD
Dec 20, 2019Ay the people that make the trailers for Nolan's movies know how to make some dope ass trailers lol
- Dec 20, 2019ess
2 people with garbage opinions walked into a bar
Dec 20, 2019·1 reply
PrinceSznmovie of the decade dropping early
Kanye style
- Dec 20, 2019WFH
Time travel
Real f***ing nice Chris real original
It's all invented right now, let's wait and see Nolan's new spin about it
Dec 20, 2019essman tried to slide chazelle in there like we wouldnt notice it
Hey he made two classics and has a whole career ahead of him. Prefer Whiplash to La La Land though.
- Dec 20, 2019Antidote
Kanye style
- Dec 20, 2019·1 reply
Banethe Drakes of directors
Nah in film there’s so few auteurs left in American cinema. I guess you can throw Wes Anderson in there but he’s redundant this point.
And Scorsese is gonna croak any year now unfortunatley. Idk who else to name
Dec 20, 2019·2 repliesMoody mannNah in film there’s so few auteurs left in American cinema. I guess you can throw Wes Anderson in there but he’s redundant this point.
And Scorsese is gonna croak any year now unfortunatley. Idk who else to name
shut the f*** about wes anderson and appreciate the other actual american auteurs