Apr 17·1 replyF***ing finally
Apr 17rip to that little girl
Apr 17
MCNi still don't understand how it took this long
also don't understand how he didn't try to disappear
he dumb dumb bro a millionaire n didnt even try to escape glad he getting his commupence
Apr 17cant lie im not celebrating just yet, im not happy how long it took police to get this arrest and im a bit scared he might get away with it
will have to see though
Apr 17·1 replyIt took 7 months to arrest this guy
Apr 17quadraIt took 7 months to arrest this guy
Why it took as long as it did is f***ing beyond me
Apr 17Life in prison
Apr 17·1 replyMCNi still don't understand how it took this long
also don't understand how he didn't try to disappear
there’s murder cases that take decades and her body was badly decomposed, they only got one chance to charge him correctly so gotta make sure everything is lined up. the prosecution has the benefit of time on their hands while gathering evidence as long as they don’t charge him cause he can also slip up at any point and they can charge him for this whenever they want after a solid case is built
Apr 17
when we hear the news he was beaten to the point he can’t move in jail
Apr 17
Apr 17
Apr 17Hope they cook his ass
Apr 17I hope this f***er burns
- Apr 17MCN
i still don't understand how it took this long
also don't understand how he didn't try to disappear
California laws and trying to build a solid case is my only guess
Apr 17- Apr 17·2 replies
D4vd’s lawyers have issued a statement on his arrest, saying they will "vigorously defend his innocence":
"Let us be clear - the actual evidence in this case will show that David Burke did not murder Celeste Rivas Hernandez and he was not the cause of her death."
"There has been no indictment returned by any grand jury in this case and no criminal complaint filed."
"David has only been detained under suspicion. We will vigorously defend David’s innocence."
Apr 17·1 replyDave Chapelle and Kanye have to do a free D4vid concert
Apr 17·4 repliesMCNi still don't understand how it took this long
also don't understand how he didn't try to disappear
its overall better to take your time to build an airtight case and not rush and throw someone on trial and potentially lose the case then u have a killer just wandering around
for this kind of case u need hella forensic experts
people combing through electronics for any possible message, file, image, etc stored somewhere that could convince a jury...
this means they probably had to go thru all his discord messages and whatevertheyll need to interview friends and families of both him and the victim probably multiple times
theyll want to subpoena phone records text records location records from various companies
theyll need to get forensic experts lined up to a***yze everything:
blood spatter in the house or scene of the crime, a***yze blood in the car, a***yze how fast she decomposed based on things like ambient temperature over x number months, what kind of injuries were on her and which of those injuries could have killer her, if any possible other thing could have killed her (eg d*** a***ysis for od, medical history, etc), have other experts ppl review the other experts work sometimes, have people tailed in some cases to see if they go back to the scene of the crime, etc
theyll want to get surveillance camera footage to prove he was definitely there at the scene of the crime, phone records to prove he hired someone else to do it if he wasnt at the scene of the crime, etc. theyll want to find his dna under her fingernails or his sweater fiber on her body and need to do forensic a***ysis on random dusts just in case. theyll want to spend time trying to get his friends to rat on him. if a gun was involved theyll want to find the gun by any means possible and get the whole history of the gun (who bought it, who sold it to who, etc. to prove only he had access to the gun at the time). if it was a knife same deal--its much harder to get a conviction without the murder weapon. and to even prove a random knife or gun was the murder weapon they need to get an expert to examine it all to prove that that particular knife/gun and no other knife/gun reasonably could have killed herobviously he seems guilty of killing her, but theres different charges they need to sort through to nail him w. bc lets say they charge him w first degree only but jury only feels like it was second degree--he'll walk free completely. defense will try to argue its an accident (manslaughter) and not murder, a friend did it and he merely helped cover up (could just be abuse of a corpse), police might find evidence to show kidnapping plus murder vs just murder and defense will want to argue its just murder no kidnapping. all kinds of stuff. theyll also need to prove he was absolutely not insane or under the influence while committing the murder
theres a lot of stuff you need to get thru
and u cant just hold someone in jail in the us willy nilly without being confident of the charges and that you can go to trial within 6 months (right to speedy trial)
Apr 17fancy lacriminalF***ing finally
Apr 17·1 reply
Apr 17·1 replyi am sasukeits overall better to take your time to build an airtight case and not rush and throw someone on trial and potentially lose the case then u have a killer just wandering around
for this kind of case u need hella forensic experts
people combing through electronics for any possible message, file, image, etc stored somewhere that could convince a jury...
this means they probably had to go thru all his discord messages and whatevertheyll need to interview friends and families of both him and the victim probably multiple times
theyll want to subpoena phone records text records location records from various companies
theyll need to get forensic experts lined up to a***yze everything:
blood spatter in the house or scene of the crime, a***yze blood in the car, a***yze how fast she decomposed based on things like ambient temperature over x number months, what kind of injuries were on her and which of those injuries could have killer her, if any possible other thing could have killed her (eg d*** a***ysis for od, medical history, etc), have other experts ppl review the other experts work sometimes, have people tailed in some cases to see if they go back to the scene of the crime, etc
theyll want to get surveillance camera footage to prove he was definitely there at the scene of the crime, phone records to prove he hired someone else to do it if he wasnt at the scene of the crime, etc. theyll want to find his dna under her fingernails or his sweater fiber on her body and need to do forensic a***ysis on random dusts just in case. theyll want to spend time trying to get his friends to rat on him. if a gun was involved theyll want to find the gun by any means possible and get the whole history of the gun (who bought it, who sold it to who, etc. to prove only he had access to the gun at the time). if it was a knife same deal--its much harder to get a conviction without the murder weapon. and to even prove a random knife or gun was the murder weapon they need to get an expert to examine it all to prove that that particular knife/gun and no other knife/gun reasonably could have killed herobviously he seems guilty of killing her, but theres different charges they need to sort through to nail him w. bc lets say they charge him w first degree only but jury only feels like it was second degree--he'll walk free completely. defense will try to argue its an accident (manslaughter) and not murder, a friend did it and he merely helped cover up (could just be abuse of a corpse), police might find evidence to show kidnapping plus murder vs just murder and defense will want to argue its just murder no kidnapping. all kinds of stuff. theyll also need to prove he was absolutely not insane or under the influence while committing the murder
theres a lot of stuff you need to get thru
and u cant just hold someone in jail in the us willy nilly without being confident of the charges and that you can go to trial within 6 months (right to speedy trial)you a lawyer ?
- Apr 17
RIP. Unbelievable it took this long for him to get charged
Apr 17
Dr Lee PhDAbout f***in time
Apr 17·1 replyi am sasukeits overall better to take your time to build an airtight case and not rush and throw someone on trial and potentially lose the case then u have a killer just wandering around
for this kind of case u need hella forensic experts
people combing through electronics for any possible message, file, image, etc stored somewhere that could convince a jury...
this means they probably had to go thru all his discord messages and whatevertheyll need to interview friends and families of both him and the victim probably multiple times
theyll want to subpoena phone records text records location records from various companies
theyll need to get forensic experts lined up to a***yze everything:
blood spatter in the house or scene of the crime, a***yze blood in the car, a***yze how fast she decomposed based on things like ambient temperature over x number months, what kind of injuries were on her and which of those injuries could have killer her, if any possible other thing could have killed her (eg d*** a***ysis for od, medical history, etc), have other experts ppl review the other experts work sometimes, have people tailed in some cases to see if they go back to the scene of the crime, etc
theyll want to get surveillance camera footage to prove he was definitely there at the scene of the crime, phone records to prove he hired someone else to do it if he wasnt at the scene of the crime, etc. theyll want to find his dna under her fingernails or his sweater fiber on her body and need to do forensic a***ysis on random dusts just in case. theyll want to spend time trying to get his friends to rat on him. if a gun was involved theyll want to find the gun by any means possible and get the whole history of the gun (who bought it, who sold it to who, etc. to prove only he had access to the gun at the time). if it was a knife same deal--its much harder to get a conviction without the murder weapon. and to even prove a random knife or gun was the murder weapon they need to get an expert to examine it all to prove that that particular knife/gun and no other knife/gun reasonably could have killed herobviously he seems guilty of killing her, but theres different charges they need to sort through to nail him w. bc lets say they charge him w first degree only but jury only feels like it was second degree--he'll walk free completely. defense will try to argue its an accident (manslaughter) and not murder, a friend did it and he merely helped cover up (could just be abuse of a corpse), police might find evidence to show kidnapping plus murder vs just murder and defense will want to argue its just murder no kidnapping. all kinds of stuff. theyll also need to prove he was absolutely not insane or under the influence while committing the murder
theres a lot of stuff you need to get thru
and u cant just hold someone in jail in the us willy nilly without being confident of the charges and that you can go to trial within 6 months (right to speedy trial)aint nobody reading all that