AUSA: Immediately after the assault, the defendant sent these messages: Call me, the cops are here. I got six kids. Yo, please call, I am surrounded. You gonna abandon me all alone.
The defendant knew he had done something that could elicit police response
AUSA: The head of his security has now been served with a subpoena, given what we've learned about his role in the offense conduct. Now, about the hotel assault - yesterday defense counsel called it a fight in a relationship. But it's trafficking.
So the video IS going to be used against him?!?!?
lol I didn't accuse Drake of doing any of those things. I even said that his orgies are probably not as malicious as Diddy's. We simply don't know what happens in them beyond prostitution. I just said he has s***parties and is into s***tourism then you claimed it to be fan fiction because you only skimmed through my initial posts.
I didn't skim through your post you said
" Drake's loser ass paying s***workers to f*** him and his friends."
Is this not an assumption? How do you know this to be true? Correct me if I'm wrong but that's fan fiction. I actually do not doubt that they be hiring s***workers and but that's just an assumption.
That's what I was getting at.
AUSA: He covered up what he did. This year, after the surveillance video came out, only then did he admit that it was him. Yesterday it was claimed that his clothes were taken - but that's not what happened. Why drag the victim back down the hall to the room?
AUSA: The indisputable evidence makes clear you cannot take the defendant at his word. March 5, 2016 is far from the defendant's lone act of violence and obstruction. Freak-off activity is the core of this case. They use force, coercion and d****
I didn't skim through your post you said
" Drake's loser ass paying s***workers to f*** him and his friends."
Is this not an assumption? How do you know this to be true? Correct me if I'm wrong but that's fan fiction. I actually do not doubt that they be hiring s***workers and but that's just an assumption.
That's what I was getting at.
Shut the f*** up
AUSA: Our investigation is ongoing. Half a dozen escorts is just the tip of the iceberg of the number of escorts who have participated in these freak-offs. This case is charged a s***trafficking by force, fraud and coercion. The acts were not consensual.
AUSA: Our investigation is ongoing. Half a dozen escorts is just the tip of the iceberg of the number of escorts who have participated in these freak-offs. This case is charged a s***trafficking by force, fraud and coercion. The acts were not consensual.
He's going to blow trial this is OVER
All rise!
Government?
AUSA Emily Johnson: The freak-offs were elaborate. They began in 2009 and extended into this year. These freak-offs were arranged with his entourage. The defendant used narcotics so that the victims would continue: ketamine, GHB and others.
Damn, the freak offs were actually pretty recent
AUSA: Our investigation is ongoing. Half a dozen escorts is just the tip of the iceberg of the number of escorts who have participated in these freak-offs. This case is charged a s***trafficking by force, fraud and coercion. The acts were not consensual.
Yep
That dumbass Boosie and others trying to make it seem like puff daddy is in this because the nigga is gay and a freak 🤦♂️
You can't win a case when there's video evidence of the freak offs, and the victims are alleging that it wasn't consensual because they were forcefully under the influence and there's evidence of him using violence in and outside of the freakoffs.
Completely Unwinnable
AUSA: Our investigation is ongoing. Half a dozen escorts is just the tip of the iceberg of the number of escorts who have participated in these freak-offs. This case is charged a s***trafficking by force, fraud and coercion. The acts were not consensual.
Idk why, but I feel like this is about to lead to the downfall Onlyfans. I bet most of those freak-offs were made up of Onlyfans models
AUSA: The defense is arguing that anyone in a freak-off wanted to be there. That's not the law. When people are threatened with exposure, and are beaten, they cannot consent. That is trafficking. Victims' heads were slammed against car windows
AUSA: Here are some text: when you get f*cked up, you knock me around. I'm not a rag doll. I'm someone's child. We have witnesses who witnessed the injuries. This conduct happened behind closed door, in houses, hotel rooms and cars. Judge Tarnofsky was concerned
those OVO parties are definitely real lol like I said we just don't know what goes on in those parties other Drake's loser ass paying s***workers to f*** him and his friends. You think his weirdo Canadian ass spends allot of time in the Carribean simply because he just loves the culture or would make it more sense than he's there for cheap s***tourism?
You really think drake is out here f***ing street escorts lmao?
AUSA: The defense is arguing that anyone in a freak-off wanted to be there. That's not the law. When people are threatened with exposure, and are beaten, they cannot consent. That is trafficking. Victims' heads were slammed against car windows
Wow
AUSA: Judge Tarnofsky found that she did not believe defense counsel can control the defendant... Consider the Mercedes case in this Circuit, reversing a decision to release a defendant. Let's turn to obstruction. Witnesses have expressed extreme fear of him
I don’t think Ye has ever been wrong before man. Scary stuff
https://twitter.com/majestyria/status/1835871581295571246I might have one idea
AUSA: Judge Tarnofsky found that she did not believe defense counsel can control the defendant... Consider the Mercedes case in this Circuit, reversing a decision to release a defendant. Let's turn to obstruction. Witnesses have expressed extreme fear of him
The defense can't get around the obstruction of justice.
There's just no way to get around him contacting witnesses.