Believing the victim's statement on what they think happened is not equal to hoping they were assaulted. Please stop before you get banned a 10th time condom eyes

no, you’re making s*** up again

Druski didn’t visit Diddy’s crib until 2020 thanks to Jack Harlow who helped him blow up mainstream

his show on revolt is from 2021

Druski got famous cause of IG/FB comedy with Desi Banks and em cause he would make fun of Georgia frat boys

again, why would Druski be gang raping a woman in 2018 with Diddy and Odell in the bag as a non-famous broke Georgia boy?

This forum post beef has wanted rape and molestation to be true at times saying they know better than the alleged women victims

I love euphoria and beginning of beef but it on here stayed how it was before beef 🥩 I would erase entire year

tons of people have attended diddy’s parties, including non rappers and people not involved in hip hop culture. and im not gonna pretend to be a genius on law, but like someone mentioned earlier, these aren’t descriptions by a credible someone in law . also a clear difference with the substantial actor that had dozens of women come out against him vs a new case of a random modern day, young comedian

We got to just block bro man

Wait til court though I don’t disbelieve the victim

Part of why Diddy had everyone on d**** is SO THAT NO ONE HAS AN ENTIRELY ACCURATE ACCOUNT OF WHAT HAPPENED

Let me state this again for the f***ing morons in the back.

Believing a victim is not hoping that something happened to them. You f***ing weirdos.

You act like you personally owe diddy a favor yourself you f***ing freaks.

it makes sense when you apply a little logic just like the jay z case

He d***ged everyone so there could be no sober friend besides his camera videos which is why they raided all houses at once then let him chill through year as they likely had to watch all blackmail footage he had

You’re doing more than believing … your source for the druski portion ISNT A RELIABLE SOURCE

is the druski thing actually in the case from a credible source or is it just some "leaked" info or something?

It’s from an actual legal filing, thought it was some troll on Twitter at first too

What’s the source of legal filing

huh, curious to see how it plays out. obviously innocent until proven guilty and the timeline makes no sense, but dont want to immediately count out a potential victim either

mad confusing

Bossy posted link on page 270

If a Twitter page posted the legal finding with no direct link that's not credible source

@Bo_Ceephus My bad, I owe you an apology. Really unserious lawyer though, wtf

Yeah it’s like the Jay z one where the timeline doesn’t really match up, but at same time gotta wait and see

All good mane

Yeah legal filings and police reports can have some wild s*** in there if you haven't read through alot of them.

Pace monitor while legit is still independent ….

you ever see that girl lawyer on tiktok who does the like readings of court transcripts and stuff? s*** is hilarious

Just be patient why you trying to be first to say druski did or didn’t rape someone good lord

Lawyers getting younger and younger

yeah there was a couple that got me good. For processes that you think are deadly serious there can be alot of f***ery. Turns out there's unserious people to every layer of our lives.