you’re putting words in my mouth & obviously have a very poor understanding of the events of the 2020 elections. f*** off.

Lmao point of what words I put in your mouth

Also elaborate on my poor understanding.

yea I can see that. what was rlly strange was warren choosing biden over bernie which made no sense based on their perspective platforms

Why are you guys engaging with this brainlet

A state elector is suppose to vote for the candidate that got the majority of their state. If the majority of ND who has 5 electors goes to one candidate as opposed to calis 55 that goes to another i dont see how ND has more influence
It would took ND's 5 and a combination of other states to reach calis 55
I dont see the issue

You guys are really engaging with someone who said Bloomberg was the tipping point of the 2020 election?

more people vote on which way a single elector votes in California than in North Dakota

therefore, each individual person voting has less influence on the election if they live in California vs. in North Dakota

it’s not that difficult a concept

where’d i say that?

dude is literally using straw man arguments to argue against something i didn’t even come close to saying LMFAOOOOO

By implying that Biden's odds of winning the primary were a lot higher because Bloomberg dropped out and endorsed him, you're implying that Bloomberg's endorsement was enough to tip the scales against Bernie Sanders when Bernie had just readily lost Super Tuesday.

no surprise your reading compression skills are terrible based on how you interpreted the events of the election

Lmao instead of typing these posts how about supporting your argument with actual facts

you made a lot of leaps to get to that conclusion

I get the concept i dont see the issue when Cali has over 10x more influence

you haven’t even responded to my argument lol you made up your own argument & pretended i said it

I responded verbatim to your post. Clarify exactly what you meant if you think I got something wrong lmao

Cali has more influence as a whole because more people live there

why else do you think California has more electors than North Dakota?

look at a states population vs electoral votes they get

yea i’m not arguing with you dude. sorry. i hope you find someone in this thread to debate with tonight. i’ve been at that level of boredom before too.

You said

Translation: Bloomberg ran to help Biden by diving a field, dropping out, and endorsing Biden (Voters who would have most likely have voted for Biden anyway as opposed to the Socialist adjacent senator of Vermont, making this a futile endeavor)

By doing that, Biden's odds of winning from casual voters were a lot higher than they would have been if it started out as Biden vs Bernie (50/50)

Bold is the dumb s*** you said

The latter implying Biden wasn't the presumed favorite to win the primary prior to all the other candidates eating away at his base in 2020.
projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-d

Implying that Bernie's plan wasn't to literally compete against Joe on a divided field

nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/bernie-sanders-bet-big-small-tent-win-democratic-nomination-here-n1179451

And you're telling me I don't know what I'm talking about, when the a***yst agree with me and not you

Humble yourself child.

look at wyoming population then divide it by # of electors then do that for california.

Every time that dude has nothing to say he retreats from the conversation instead of just admitting he's wrong. Lmao

Support your claim bro. Please verify that Bloomberg wanted to divide the campaign to steal votes away from Joe Biden (Also known as Joe Budden) so that he could later drop out and endorse Joe Biden so he could get those same voters back in order to beat Sanders.

he’s got a hand wave emoji, we might be getting trolled dude