I just heard of this agenda 21 thing and the Rothschilds and committee of 300. This s*** is what Alex Jones has been talking about. Anyone believe this or is this bs?
You know it’s bullshit when it implies the reader will be the victim of a conspiracy that literally no one would profit from
i used to somewhat believe in all these depopulation new world order conspiracies when i was a teenager but then i grew up and realized theres no way the powers at be would allow for the extermination of half the population because itd be less people for them to oppress. so now they just passively commit genocide.
Depopulation was a strategy that the US considered in sub-Saharan Africa to combat anthropogenic climate change effects. Paul R. Ehrlich, a biologist known for his stance on population control, worked for the White House under the Obama administration. One of his solutions to global overpopulation is the introduction of a global-scale organisation that has the capacity to control population growth and their patterns.
Malthus really f***ed up the game though. Man was smoking the biggest blunts back in the day smfh
I do believe tho that people in developing countries should use protection more and get an education.
Depopulation was a strategy that the US considered in sub-Saharan Africa to combat anthropogenic climate change effects. Paul R. Ehrlich, a biologist known for his stance on population control, worked for the White House under the Obama administration. One of his solutions to global overpopulation is the introduction of a global-scale organisation that has the capacity to control population growth and their patterns.
But there developed world are the highest net contributors
But there developed world are the highest net contributors
Aside from the states, population is low in the developed world (Europe, Japan, Canada).
Aside from the states, population is low in the developed world (Europe, Japan, Canada).
Europe is far more densely populated than America or the developing world. And I'm talking about carbon footprint, a person living in the developed world has a bigger negative Impact on climate change than someone in a developing world.
Europe is far more densely populated than America or the developing world. And I'm talking about carbon footprint, a person living in the developed world has a bigger negative Impact on climate change than someone in a developing world.
No one questions that, but the least developed countries are going to experience climate change’s effects more intensely because of natural resources and agricultural output will see a decrease due to increased pollution and deforestation. This in return will multiply migratory rates, especially migration up north to Europe and North America from Subsaharan Africa and Central-South Asia.
But in general, the cities of the less and least developed countries are more densely populated than the cities of Europe and North America. This has to do with the Washington Consensus implemented in the developing world by the IMF, World Bank and US department of treasury in the 70s. Partially, the Washington Consensus concentrated economic growth in cities like Lagos and Addis Ababa while ignoring rural development. This saw an exponential increase of slums across the less/least developed world. Even where the Washington Consensus didn’t take place, cities like Guangzhou’s borders sprawl so randomly to avoid taking the slums in in its outskirts into consideration
i used to somewhat believe in all these depopulation new world order conspiracies when i was a teenager but then i grew up and realized theres no way the powers at be would allow for the extermination of half the population because itd be less people for them to oppress. so now they just passively commit genocide.
You think an opresser cares how many they oppress? What are you talking about?
You think an opresser cares how many they oppress? What are you talking about?
They aren't just going to come out and straight up wipe out half of the labor force lol
They aren't just going to come out and straight up wipe out half of the labor force lol
Depends who they’re targeting and how many. They will do it slowly. For instance black people aren’t half the population
Depends who they’re targeting and how many. They will do it slowly. For instance black people aren’t half the population
I think their much more interested in making people subservient through slave labor and ever worsening material conditions than outright elimination
I think their much more interested in making people subservient through slave labor and ever worsening material conditions than outright elimination
This pretty much. More people working, more people paying taxes and buying s***.