Dolphin

Page 1 of 41
Reply
  • Semi 馃惉
    Updated Aug 6

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    1 reply
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

  • Semi 馃惉
    OP
    May 15
    Semi
    路 edited

    No mind is more valuable than the next.

    The thought that an individual is owed some sort of stipend for being is flawed.

    "Worth" is earned in a world where functional tasks need to be carried out.

    Putting a price on the thoughts of an individual is flawed.

    Monetary value on art is flawed.

    The individual does not need to be their functioning role.

    At the same time what is the purpose of a functioning roll rather than to function as a whole? Is the question just the implicit question of life itself.

    How do you contribute value? Can you contribute value being yourself? To what degree does that impact the self? Is it cyclic? Is it self fueling, in the way that the world forms art, and consequently art starts to form the world.

    Impressions of a moment, a perspective within life, has the human has become the art form?

    Are you for sale?


    I am interloping through the fractals of human consciousness


    The individual doesn't determine what it is to the world, the world does, in that way we can be something without knowing we are it.

    So the question "what am I?" Has no real answer, as it would also ask to what? And to what? Would need there to be a "what", and as the self cannot describe itself the whole cannot either.

    Does the whole definite the whole? Or does the observer of the whole definite the whole? Can anyone observe the whole? Or is it all just an impression of the whole from the self? It's just all flawed "logic"

    Logic is flawed by logic


    There is no ideal time period, just have to learn to live in the one you are in. It's all give and take, value systems are antiquated by a changing world. Nothing stays the same. Evolution of think is continuous and dependent on the needs of the species wide scale at any given moment in time.


    Perspective is not determined by the individual


    Do not stray from a value system to pursue ephemeral pleasure.


    Does an infinitely long line re join with itself?


    Is adaption always cognisant? Generational adaptive cognizance?


    Deconstruct the model of the mind and re built it with the ethos of the whole.


    The most dangerous part of ai would be the human part.


    Duality of consciousness as a circumstance of withstanding natural phenomenon


    The more you consume of a certain form of media the more normalized it becomes to you.

    Almost like a threshold to which you need to overcome in order to experience again.

    So the complexity of the art form would then evolve with the complexity of the species which is also the technological innovations of the species.

    Which lead to forms of media that enable more sensory input to be given to the consumer.

    I think there may be a balance tho, or at least there is some theoretical balance at which it becomes "uncanny".

    Does art have any definition other than a representation of the world? Does art become full circle when it becomes so immersive that it becomes the world.

    Does art necessitate a deviation from standard sensory perception. If so then art will always be outside of what is "real".


    Freedom is an illusion

    To seek it is futile, agency within the limits of the natural world is determined how autonomous a being can be.

    To be autonomous creates layers of representatation from the natural world. In a way "freedom" or the pursuit of it is not a endeavor rooted in natural coexistence, but rather in attempts to control the bounds in which we live in.

    In a way an attempt to impart external will onto the world.

    The pursuit of Freedom in my head in many ways is futile, as it almost necessitates negotiation with the natural world.

    That negotiating only sevres as a detriment to a species long term.

    True freedom perhaps is the ability to coexist within an environment, and true freedom of consciousness may be that the "freedom of consciousness" , or "freedom of bounds to our relationship with the natural world"
    is not a pursuit of consciousness


    Decay can bring destructive Melancholy - avoidance in the form of hedonism or regression.

    Both sects lack of rather they promote non-care. In the case of hard times, language can be used as uplifting or the inverse. Humor is complex and indicative of the the individual. Rhetorical tools tell you an individual's "individual" value system. The impact of the world may be in ways "clean", where the internal monologue may be "dirty". The divider I suppose is more interpersonal than empirical. Which in the case of large scale society, functionality is dependent more so on an individual's external impact. This I believe causes more cases of "dirty" or self defeating thought (can be seen in self defeating groupthink) which plays back into itself as it serves as an outlier for those who love to "serve" the external rather than to be a part of it in a mutual way.

    In essence the overall "moral" of an institution js of higher importance the smaller the organization or the degree to which limited structure is present in the niche the organization occupies. This relates back to the states occupied by "dirty/clouded" thought, the more hopeless the mind is for change, or the more dissonance the mind experiences in terms of perceived value. The above contribute to paths that feed into hopeless demeanor, as that is the precipice for entry within the decay state.


    Do objects have one time? I suppose time is not a eternal attribute of an object but rather a prescribed one.


    Real is not a question with an answer, because real is just a concept. An answer to the question what am I? Has answers that are equally as insipid. To attribute value to oneself is a characteristic of the self.


    There is a degree of determinism that exist within the neural network we use to navigate both with conscious and the subconscious. I believe their are groupings of "phrases or signals" that operate similarly to a state machine, which determine how our brain makes decisions. The more pathways to a state the more "weight" it carries. Linguistics and consciousness are intertwined and I would not be surprised to find out down the line that the quantum property of particles and superposition has something to do with "free will" / deviation from determinism.

1
2
...
41