the stage video is irrelevant to whether or not law enforcement would get involved lol
Why were no charges pressed then lol
110 pages goddamn
Thegreatdivine was talking with complete confidence about what it meant that Drake came to an agreement over this with umg just last night only to be proven completely wrong less than 12 hours later I don’t know why anybody bothers debating him about this s*** when it’s in complete bad faith
Tell me you have a room temp IQ without telling me
In my high school there was this 16 year old that was dating a 20 year old and she was completely okay with it.
I’m very positive if someone asked her today if that relationship was okay, she would probably say that it was.
Based on her response now, do you think that relationship she had when she was 16 was okay?
Universal Music Group releases statement following Drake's defamation lawsuit against them:
"Not only are these claims untrue, but the notion that we would seek to harm the reputation of any artist — let alone Drake — is illogical. We have invested massively in his music and our employees around the world have worked tirelessly for many years to help him achieve historic commercial and personal financial success. Throughout his career, Drake has intentionally and successfully used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to engage in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth 'rap battles' to express his feelings about other artists. He now seeks to weaponize the legal process to silence an artist's creative expression and to seek damages from UMG for distributing that artist's music. We have not and do not engage in defamation — against any individual. At the same time, we will vigorously defend this litigation to protect our people and our reputation, as well as any artist who might directly or indirectly become a frivolous litigation target for having done nothing more that write a song."
damn that sounds like UMG is gonna spare Kendrick and won’t sue him as a result of Drake taking legal action like they allegedly said they would initially
@Magenta What if they call you as witness?
Reporting for duty 🫡
how did it go from settled on an agreement to federal lawsuit in under 12 hours
i thought it was the first petition was dropped but the one against UMG and iheart went thru
has hip hop ever seen a a bigger b****?
Never will on this magnitude again
real s*** tho yall fr believe kendrick doxxed drake? be fr
Of course not
Kanye did in 2021
Thegreatdivine was talking with complete confidence about what it meant that Drake came to an agreement over this with umg just last night only to be proven completely wrong less than 12 hours later I don’t know why anybody bothers debating him about this s*** when it’s in complete bad faith
you knew the federal suit was coming? and you didnt tell us?
You should start by banning people who spam the video if you believe shes a victim no?
that’s a rabbit hole i don’t think anyone wants to go down
if you say that posting the video because she’s a victim should be banworthy, that’s a few logic steps away from just being a Drake fan becoming banworthy, and might as well just toss the servers in the trash while we’re at it
Universal Music Group releases statement following Drake's defamation lawsuit against them:
"Not only are these claims untrue, but the notion that we would seek to harm the reputation of any artist — let alone Drake — is illogical. We have invested massively in his music and our employees around the world have worked tirelessly for many years to help him achieve historic commercial and personal financial success. Throughout his career, Drake has intentionally and successfully used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to engage in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth 'rap battles' to express his feelings about other artists. He now seeks to weaponize the legal process to silence an artist's creative expression and to seek damages from UMG for distributing that artist's music. We have not and do not engage in defamation — against any individual. At the same time, we will vigorously defend this litigation to protect our people and our reputation, as well as any artist who might directly or indirectly become a frivolous litigation target for having done nothing more that write a song."
This real? Can’t find enough ppl reporting on it yet
just a heads up, i do not care how long you’ve had an account on here, you will get banned for defending a grown man groping a 17 year old
TALK TO THESE NIGGAS PLEASE ITS HURTING MY HEART
I literally agree it is weird i’m not debating that lmao but to call him a full blown pedo over it is crazy. Still doesn’t change the fact that he never even got in legit legal trouble over it. So throwing around false accusations is defamatory. Court of public opinion doesn’t matter in the ACTUAL courts.
so if you find it weird right
why are you mad other adults think it’s weird and it’s their opinion that a man that would do that with minors may be a pedophile?
i can’t steal a shirt and be mad I’m being called a thief lol you the type that would defend me “but it’s a really nice shirt” but like… i still stole it and you probably don’t wanna leave ya nice things around me 😂😂😂😂
Nah I was with you but you violating now lmao
Tbh, it's more a UofM beef than a beef with Tom
so your entire point here is “the video evidence can be dismissed because the minor was fine with what happened”???
Do you believe that video acts as proof that he's a pedophile or was he a 22 year-old, drunk on stage on his first tour as a headliner who said something inappropriate to a young woman who got picked randomly and turned out to be 17?
Again, yes, him touching her how he did and saying what he said to her was inappropriate. No one is defending that or debating it but y'all can't keep going back to that as some sort of "gotcha" to prove he's a pedophile when that only ever happened once and at a time in his career when he was just getting into the game.
And yes, the person in question is now a 31 year old woman who has had 14 years to go over the events of that day in her head and she has decided, back in 2018 when she first addressed it and again in 2024, that the video and her shouldn't be used by anyone to prove Drake is a pedophile. She understands that he was a drunk, stupid 22 year old who did something he wasn't supposed to do.
Artistic expression/freedom of speech is what makes defamation hard to prove. Buddy, public perception is the root evidence. Think.
Yeah sure cause calling somebody a pedo on the world stage isn’t “defamatory” holy s*** you’re all dumber than I thought
News flash levying serious accusations ones that land people in jail for life has consequences
real s*** tho yall fr believe kendrick doxxed drake? be fr
All you have to do is to look at the definition of the word. Yes, he did doxx him, unless you want the world to use YOUR definition of the word.
real s*** tho yall fr believe kendrick doxxed drake? be fr
I feel like to the general public who has no interest or knowledge about Drake yeah he did to a degree. Obviously its public knowledge you can look up, but he amplified it by using it as a single cover.
Universal Music Group releases statement following Drake's defamation lawsuit against them:
"Not only are these claims untrue, but the notion that we would seek to harm the reputation of any artist — let alone Drake — is illogical. We have invested massively in his music and our employees around the world have worked tirelessly for many years to help him achieve historic commercial and personal financial success. Throughout his career, Drake has intentionally and successfully used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to engage in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth 'rap battles' to express his feelings about other artists. He now seeks to weaponize the legal process to silence an artist's creative expression and to seek damages from UMG for distributing that artist's music. We have not and do not engage in defamation — against any individual. At the same time, we will vigorously defend this litigation to protect our people and our reputation, as well as any artist who might directly or indirectly become a frivolous litigation target for having done nothing more that write a song."
UMG went from "take it up with Kendrick" to being like "okay actually we have to stop this from happening to anyone else"
This real? Can’t find enough ppl reporting on it yet
It's funny how people outside Canada are like oh let's check out the Drake album, pretty good, love the memes etc, when we will never know how many people he's killed, how many lives he's destroyed with his iron grip on Toronto's underworld, how many people he's silenced.