Drake fans went from begging Kendrick to engage in a battle to now wishing battling didn’t exist.
Are you stupid? Defamation by definition isn't criminal in the US
I heard that Trippie redd is also getting sued for defamation
Just wait until he hits the red button yall

:jordanlaff3:
Kendrick saw this and started cracking up
Kendrick saw this and started cracking up

Drake fans went from begging Kendrick to engage in a battle to now wishing battling didn’t exist.
Taylor made freestyle victory lap continues to age worse and worse

Do you think they bonded over stepping out on their queens to sample something white?
You got a link to read about this? I don’t even know exactly what to google
Because if that’s true it’s automatic L for Drake
Look up "consenting to engage in defamation." There were moments in the beef where s*** could have been ended, but Drake kept going and even defamed the person who he is claiming defamed him. One could argue that this serves as a consent to engage in defamation and is a massive blow to his case.
USE THIS AS A "THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DROP" BUTTON
“They did indeed have something to drop”
Literally only the internet cares about this s***
Hood been moved on ain’t pay attention to the beef since Family Matters and that’s it lol
KTT dorks stay over a***yzing
Thanks for speaking for the hood dork
Look up "consenting to engage in defamation." There were moments in the beef where s*** could have been ended, but Drake kept going and even defamed the person who he is claiming defamed him. One could argue that this serves as a consent to engage in defamation and is a massive blow to his case.
minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-defamation/consent-as-a-defense-to-defamation
“A person may give consent by words, actions or by certain behavior, including inaction. A statement of consent does not have to be directly spoken or communicated to another, and it does not have to be written down in order to be considered valid.
It is enough that the consent is understood by or seems apparent to the publisher as determined by reasonable people based on the conduct of the plaintiff and the circumstances surrounding the publication”
Yeah he might get cooked just based on this. I’m not a lawyer or anything but just based on common sense I’m not sure how Drake and his team would be able to say he didn’t consent to this
Are you stupid? Defamation by definition isn't criminal in the US
when conducted by a corporation or bank it is in 23 states
https://www.minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-defamation/consent-as-a-defense-to-defamation/
“A person may give consent by words, actions or by certain behavior, including inaction. A statement of consent does not have to be directly spoken or communicated to another, and it does not have to be written down in order to be considered valid.
It is enough that the consent is understood by or seems apparent to the publisher as determined by reasonable people based on the conduct of the plaintiff and the circumstances surrounding the publication”
Yeah he might get cooked just based on this. I’m not a lawyer or anything but just based on common sense I’m not sure how Drake and his team would be able to say he didn’t consent to this
It needs to be said that it's extremely difficult to successfully sue someone for defamation. Otherwise, it would happen all the time. Hell, look at this website. But we all engage in this internet s*** and implicate ourselves
Do you think they bonded over stepping out on their queens to sample something white?
Nah but definitely bonded over Drake making perfect references cause if you watch that clip pressing that button was a bad move for the character
But ofc like Drake, you gotta bring up innocent women to attack in your statements who forgave their men, healed, and now have children with said men happily
It needs to be said that it's extremely difficult to successfully sue someone for defamation. Otherwise, it would happen all the time. Hell, look at this website. But we all engage in this internet s*** and implicate ourselves
It would make more sense to just straight up sue Kendrick for defamation but he’s suing the label for letting Kendrick do that
But also if the label says “you consented to the defamation” doesn’t that mean they’re admitting it was defamation?
Or would it not even matter because he consented to it?
S***s confusing
It would make more sense to just straight up sue Kendrick for defamation but he’s suing the label for letting Kendrick do that
But also if the label says “you consented to the defamation” doesn’t that mean they’re admitting it was defamation?
Or would it not even matter because he consented to it?
S***s confusing
Kendrick would just countersue Drake for calling him a woman beater based on nothing
There's not much he can do. But he can try (and fail)