Apr 3, 2025Zack has a mouth full of fish tank rocks for teeth and hes trying to explain the f***ing s*** to us via Beantoastville
Apr 3, 2025·1 reply
notbrockYes but Drake was saying UMG used illegal means to promote a song that defames him with the intention to purposefully damage his career
Without that he’s basically suing them because they let Kendrick call him a name (which he also did) So even if he wins this thing it doesn’t f***ing mean anything
Issue is not whether they legally or illegally pushed the song. He is claiming that the song itself is a defamation of his character and his own label is complicit if they pushed the song - botting or not.
- Apr 3, 2025·2 replies
The sole purpose of this lawsuit seems to be making UMG crack down and control what their artists say in diss records, Which ain’t cool
I think he just wants to make sure Kendrick can never diss him again
Apr 3, 2025·1 reply
ICEMAN40Do you know who you’re talking to?
Smoking yall pacc
Gosh 😹Apr 3, 2025notbrockThe sole purpose of this lawsuit seems to be making UMG crack down and control what their artists say in diss records, Which ain’t cool
I think he just wants to make sure Kendrick can never diss him again
He’s making sure NOBODY can ever diss him again
Apr 3, 2025·1 replynotbrockThe sole purpose of this lawsuit seems to be making UMG crack down and control what their artists say in diss records, Which ain’t cool
I think he just wants to make sure Kendrick can never diss him again
Drake is killing hip hop out his own selfishness
- Apr 3, 2025·2 repliesLaced
Drake is killing hip hop out his own selfishness
I don’t think he’s killing hip hop
He’s just trying to make it where labels won’t allow their artists to diss him because he’ll sue
Which is max wealthy suburban white kid energy
- Apr 3, 2025·1 replyZack From The Six
Issue is not whether they legally or illegally pushed the song. He is claiming that the song itself is a defamation of his character and his own label is complicit if they pushed the song - botting or not.
Kind of hypocritical isn’t it?
- Apr 3, 2025notbrock
I don’t think he’s killing hip hop
He’s just trying to make it where labels won’t allow their artists to diss him because he’ll sue
Which is max wealthy suburban white kid energy
If he wins, other labels will look at this and possibly put a stop to any diss record released by their artists as well, which is basically censorship. Diss records are a part of hip hop so that is killing off a part of it
- Apr 3, 2025·2 repliesnotbrock
Kind of hypocritical isn’t it?
The law doesn't care about the word ''hypocritical''.
- Apr 3, 2025·1 replyZack From The Six
The law doesn't care about the word ''hypocritical''.
But they do care if drake willingly participated, egged on, and released his own songs defaming others.
- Apr 3, 2025·2 repliesWT777
Sopranovo
Before like that dropped vs now
- Apr 3, 2025Free YoungBoy
Before like that dropped vs now
The fish got a lot of company lol
Apr 3, 2025·1 replynotbrockI don’t think he’s killing hip hop
He’s just trying to make it where labels won’t allow their artists to diss him because he’ll sue
Which is max wealthy suburban white kid energy
When I lose a basketball game i tell the ref to change the rules so the other team cant shoot the ball against me :B
- Apr 3, 2025·4 repliesLaced
But they do care if drake willingly participated, egged on, and released his own songs defaming others.
No, that's not how a defamation lawsuit works. It doesn't matter what Drake said about Kendrick. The only thing that matters are 1) can he prove that the song caused damage to his character and 2) can he prove that his own label participated in pushing the song and thereby directly contributed to the damage of his character
Drake ''Willingly participating'' in a rap beef, ''egging on'' etc. won't remove any liability from his label
- Apr 3, 2025Zack From The Six
The law doesn't care about the word ''hypocritical''.
My guy I can tell by your last few replies you know this lawsuit is looking ridiculous and has zero things making it justifiable
Drake is being so blatantly pathetic it’s almost impossible to twist this into any kind of W
- Apr 3, 2025Zack From The Six
No, that's not how a defamation lawsuit works. It doesn't matter what Drake said about Kendrick. The only thing that matters are 1) can he prove that the song caused damage to his character and 2) can he prove that his own label participated in pushing the song and thereby directly contributed to the damage of his character
Drake ''Willingly participating'' in a rap beef, ''egging on'' etc. won't remove any liability from his label
If it was that black and white, UMG wouldn't of went with the defense they submitted. Context matters, even in the court of law.
- Apr 3, 2025insertcoolnamehere
When I lose a basketball game i tell the ref to change the rules so the other team cant shoot the ball against me :B
Pretty much sums up what’s going on here lol
- Apr 3, 2025·2 repliesZack From The Six
No, that's not how a defamation lawsuit works. It doesn't matter what Drake said about Kendrick. The only thing that matters are 1) can he prove that the song caused damage to his character and 2) can he prove that his own label participated in pushing the song and thereby directly contributed to the damage of his character
Drake ''Willingly participating'' in a rap beef, ''egging on'' etc. won't remove any liability from his label
So then Kendrick and any other artist that’s ever participated in a beef can justifiably sue?
- Apr 3, 2025·2 repliesnotbrock
So then Kendrick and any other artist that’s ever participated in a beef can justifiably sue?
Drake hasn't sued Kendrick. He has sued his own label.
- Gosh 😹Apr 3, 2025Zack From The Six
Drake hasn't sued Kendrick. He has sued his own label.
That wasn’t even the question he asked
- Apr 3, 2025notbrock
So then Kendrick and any other artist that’s ever participated in a beef can justifiably sue?
Yes, Kendrick can sue if he wants to lmao.
- Apr 3, 2025·1 replyZack From The Six
Drake hasn't sued Kendrick. He has sued his own label.
So follow along carefully Zack
He’s suing the label for allowing one of their artists to defame him
You’re saying every artist who got dissed on a song released by a major label has the right to sue that label
And if that’s the case, Do you think labels are gonna allow their artists to do something that could cause a potential lawsuit?
- ICEMAN40 🧤Apr 3, 2025·1 replyVert1600
Smoking yall pacc
Apr 3, 2025Zack has been posting in this thread non stop for 2 hours. More posts I’ve made in this thread in a week