Seen her say multiple times UMG's motion to dismiss failing meant the court thought they were hiding something

“Drake has the best lawyers they wouldn’t take the case for no reason”

MAGA because I don't f*** with a blog

bot ties is crazy

Rolling stone isn’t a blog

Yall had no issues with blogs when that was the only source of Kendrick beating women

Talking about some “I don’t even think Kendrick will make it to the Super Bowl”

anyone not believing this had 6 people in their class in high school

Immediately got two blocked replies 😂

Okliar

Blocking out people proving them wrong

Typical MAGA s***

I had 5 and we all had to hold hands when walking in the hallways. What’s the issue??

Doesn’t f*** with blogs

F***s with AkademiksTV, aubreysattorney, Certifiedjared, OVODocket etc.,

I’ve never met one drake fan irl

Lol it's quite embarrassing to see them scrambling like this

ktt2.com/drake-files-a-federal-suit-against-umg-for-defamation-32582642/114#post-52156787

All of you Drake fans cheering for a corporation when you claim to be anti industry should be ashamed

ok

So, Drake's streams from 2015-2021 weren't fraudulent? Why only point out his streams from January 2022-September 2025 as such?

The 37B Spotify Drake streams the plaintiff alleges are fraudulent are about the amount of streams Drake pulled from January 2022 to September 2025. Is plaintiff alleging that Drake pulled 0 organic streams in that time period?

If this was really about exposing a massive industry-wide injustice, why not at least run an investigation on the numbers of the top 5, top 10, top 15, top 20 or top 25 most-streamed artists on Spotify to see if the same alleged fraudulent streams are happening with their numbers, file a blockbuster lawsuit exposing such and then claim exponentially more money for damages? Also, why only center Drake?

And why is the face of the lawsuit a man with ties to LA/The West Coast/Dr. Dre — all parties who have been in conflict with Drake since at least last year?

It might as well be at this point tbh.

fax but So, Drake's streams from 2015-2021 weren't fraudulent? Why only point out his streams from January 2022-September 2025 as such?

The 37B Spotify Drake streams the plaintiff alleges are fraudulent about the amount of streams Drake pulled from January 2022 to September 2025. Is plaintiff alleging that Drake pulled 0 organic streams in that time period?

If this was really about exposing a massive industry-wide injustice, why not at least run an investigation on the numbers of the top 5, top 10, top 15, top 20 or top 25 most-streamed artists on Spotify to see if the same alleged fraudulent streams are happening with their numbers, file a blockbuster lawsuit exposing such and then claim exponentially more money for damages? Also, why only center Drake?

And why is the face of the lawsuit a man with ties to LA/The West Coast/Dr. Dre — all parties who have been in conflict with Drake since at least last year?

Oh and I did my research and you were right about this. My bad.

Tell me you're stupid to answer the questions without saying so.

maybe "hit the red button" was a internal code for running these bots