Mar 2, 2022Num 1underheavendrake is 35 ye is 9 years older and hov is 17 years older there networths shouldnt be compared at all.but people always put him up against them they dont do that to cole or kdot
Agreed, which is also why drake should be less worried about it
He even rapped a line similar to that
Mar 2, 2022
RyukaPlease don't google my net worth, the numbers are way off
I mean, if you comparin' it to what I really made off with- Mar 2, 2022
Drake's number has been 50m since 2013 lol. He never puts his deal numbers into the press so nobody has any idea.
- Mar 2, 2022·2 replies
TheViciousCircleWas about to say- sometimes the people who calculate these things are very accurate, but I imagine figuring out how much something like Nocta generates (a very unique deal with its value hard to determine from the outside) without public numbers is just spitballing.
Nocta prob not profitable atm
- Mar 2, 2022·1 replyArs
Nocta prob not profitable atm
No idea if it’s profitable, but I’m sure he’s getting a large pay out from it.
- Mar 2, 2022·2 repliesTheViciousCircle
No idea if it’s profitable, but I’m sure he’s getting a large pay out from it.
how would he getting a payout if its not profitable
- Mar 2, 2022Ars
how would he getting a payout if its not profitable
i dont think nocta is profitable too i think nocta is his licensing deal .he probably has another endorsment type deal (the normal one) a fixed amount broken over a couple of years
- Mar 2, 2022·1 replyArs
how would he getting a payout if its not profitable
Because he’s probably not compensated by Nocta purely through profits. Just by getting to use his name he’s getting paid; if anything, a contributing factor to Notca not being profitable would be how much Nike has to pay him to use his name.
- Mar 2, 2022·1 replyTheViciousCircle
Because he’s probably not compensated by Nocta purely through profits. Just by getting to use his name he’s getting paid; if anything, a contributing factor to Notca not being profitable would be how much Nike has to pay him to use his name.
Drake getting paid by Nike would be a part of the operating costs of Nocta, aside from the success or profitability of Nocta.
- Mar 2, 2022·1 replyTheViciousCircle
Drake getting paid by Nike would be a part of the operating costs of Nocta, aside from the success or profitability of Nocta.
you mean an endorsment deal with nike.that has little to with nocta.nocta is more yezzy jordan type deal.than lebron like.
i actually belive he has 2 
Mar 2, 2022·1 reply
D DotI agree with this.
What’s the point of commenting with a passive aggressive emoji?
How can you be passive aggressive to an IG post about yourself that you only know the truth to
- Mar 2, 2022·2 repliesNum 1underheaven
you mean an endorsment deal with nike.that has little to with nocta.nocta is more yezzy jordan type deal.than lebron like.
i actually belive he has 2Don’t think Nocta is quite like Yeezy- someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe Yeezy is a Kanye-owned corporation in partnership with adidas. I think Nocta is an imprint of Nike wholly within the entity that is Nike. Just outta curiosity I emailed the attorney who filed the Nocta trademark to see if he represents the Drake team or Nike team (I work in contract law).
Mar 2, 2022D DotI agree with this.
What’s the point of commenting with a passive aggressive emoji?
what a hoe
- Mar 3, 2022TheViciousCircle
Don’t think Nocta is quite like Yeezy- someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe Yeezy is a Kanye-owned corporation in partnership with adidas. I think Nocta is an imprint of Nike wholly within the entity that is Nike. Just outta curiosity I emailed the attorney who filed the Nocta trademark to see if he represents the Drake team or Nike team (I work in contract law).
what did he say
- Mar 3, 2022quadra
How can you be passive aggressive to an IG post about yourself that you only know the truth to
They just saying anything these days man lol
- Mar 3, 2022TheViciousCircle
Don’t think Nocta is quite like Yeezy- someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe Yeezy is a Kanye-owned corporation in partnership with adidas. I think Nocta is an imprint of Nike wholly within the entity that is Nike. Just outta curiosity I emailed the attorney who filed the Nocta trademark to see if he represents the Drake team or Nike team (I work in contract law).
Think it was drakes attorney who filed the nocta trademark dont quote me on that though
- Mar 3, 2022·2 replies
Bunch of pocket watchers itt
- Mar 3, 2022·1 replySHAQUILLE
Bunch of pocket watchers itt
You was just in the forbes thread yday man
- Mar 3, 2022·1 replyHtownwolf
You was just in the forbes thread yday man
Yeah I made one post saying tech 9ine has a big fanbase
- Mar 3, 2022·1 replySHAQUILLE
Bunch of pocket watchers itt
forbes whole job centres around "pocket watching"
- Mar 3, 2022·1 replySHAQUILLE
Yeah I made one post saying tech 9ine has a big fanbase
Not even gonna lie to you Idk where they be hiding out at. Havent met a tech n9ne fan in years
- Mar 3, 2022Num 1underheaven
forbes whole job centres around "pocket watching"
I’m just kidding man
- Mar 3, 2022Htownwolf
Not even gonna lie to you Idk where they be hiding out at. Havent met a tech n9ne fan in years
He has the “real hip hop” demo on lock
Mar 3, 2022Nocta is a sub label under nike like Jordan is, it is a completely separate entity from nike as Jordan is. Drakes attorney also filed all of the trademarks so he definitely owns nocta himself. Same as his production company, same as a majority of his dealings.
- Mar 3, 2022
orangetcovidHow is wiz making that much while his music flopping
These dudes ain’t making money off music
Wiz has had successful businesses and a loyal following for years now