You don’t think hanging out and talking to underage girls when you’re in mid 20’s is wierd lil bro?

even condom eyes is compromised

I’m rooting for Drake and I’m not joking

He's a good dude really
Just wants a reaction and see who he can f*** with.

So I guess diddy was innocent up until this year since he wasn’t in jail and had no lawsuits

Nigga I broke down how this a umg vs drake battle

Everything Kendrick said is still true

But shoot the head which is Lucian not Drake

First, there's currently no proof other than the Drizzy fandom Echo Chamber still salty about a beef that ended half a year ago and that is struggling to move on.

Secondly, if that were to be proven true :
Drake's been using massive promo for a minute thanks to UMG, but since he's openly crying about it when others use the same tactics then he's a victim I guess ?

Drake stans finally woke up for school and their defense is even worse than it was yesterday

Drake is not Diddy

I’m not a Drake Stan try again

You think this lawsuit/info request gonna get accepted or nah?

Drake fans acting like there ain’t a clear f***ing pattern

He may not be a pedophile but he sure is ironically in some minors DMs all the time

Y’all want that man to be a pedophile so badly it’s actually disgusting

Kendrick meat riders crying in Drake sxn after he just dropped an album

They have

This is part of why METRO SAID SAY WHY I DONT TRUST YOU WE ALL WILL LOOK BAD

RELATION TO DIDDY AND PAYOLA

Friendly reminder that if you’re the Carrel dude or the zack dude and you quote me I will skip over your post

That’s great sassy nigga dig up the dceu

We don’t want. He just is. Plain and simple.

this thread is in music sxn too my guy

if i was f***ing young girls i promise i’d be arrested

Dude shows kindness and support to a young industry actor and you want to call it GROOMING? You’re so f***ing weird

Lucian is the actual pedophile and has witnessed horrors you don’t find it unusual to threaten to sanction a victims lawyer who names you ?

hope they never have daughters.

The worst takes in here are those categorizing this as a moral crusade as opposed to an artist looking to leverage a labelmate’s diss track as means to (hopefully) settle out of court an early release from a record label.

Don’t take it from me - read the last nature of the dispute.

“Streaming and licensing is a zero-sum game. Every time a song "breaks through,"
it means another artist does not. UMG's choice to saturate the music market with "Not Like Us"
comes at the expense of its other artists, like Drake. As Drake is Petitioner's sole owner, and Petitioner owns the copyright to Drake's entire catalogue, Petitioner suffered economic harm as a result of UMG's scheme.”

Notice something in that writing: How many artists you know are in a similar position of being a sole owner of their own catalog? Right.

This wouldn’t set precedent for other artists at all like the Taylor Swift case - although I’m sure Drake’s team would like to think so. 😭