the second law of thermodynamics is that as things cool down over time systems become increasingly disordered. this is scientific law and the very principle of this law is in direct opposition with the theory of evolution.
thoughts?

How does that discredit evolution whatsoever

Mutations happen all the time

we literally evolve dog breeds all the time

OP is so wrong lmao.

that's only true in a closed system.. now just look at the sun outside shining more energy into the system

i thought u was a real nigga?

why u not in harvard rn?

op doesn’t understand entropy

the second law of thermodynamics is that as things cool down over time systems become increasingly disordered. this is scientific law and the very principle of this law is in direct opposition with the theory of evolution.
thoughts?

Well.. the theory of evolution is supposedly very slow, so it probably wouldn’t look chaotic unless you look at it over millions of years or whatever.

Personally my issue with macro-evolution is Darwin’s issue with it. There’s just not enough evidence of links between completely different kingdoms, genuses and classes. If macro evolution existed would there not be just as many if not more fossils for in-between species as known ones?

convergent evolution there are many adaptations that evolved in completely separated lineages. example: the eye is found in so many different species that arent even closely related

sounds like you know a lot about thermodynamics op, want to explain how that even remotely relates to evolution?

That doesn’t address the point I’m bringing up though.

my forefathers monke

bait