1. Akira Kurosawa
2. Johnnie To
3. Spielberg
4. Bong
5. Kubrick
6. David Lean
8. King Hu
9. Polanski
10. Carpenter
somehting like that
1. Akira Kurosawa
2. Johnnie To
3. Spielberg
4. Bong
5. Kubrick
6. David Lean
8. King Hu
9. Polanski
10. Carpenter
somehting like that
yup that was what I was thinking about.
You would be able to vote for 30-70 directors. Idk if 30 is a bit high as a threshold tho
I'd do an all-time directors list with 30-70 picks per voter.
Id be down for sure
yup that was what I was thinking about.
You would be able to vote for 30-70 directors. Idk if 30 is a bit high as a threshold tho
Imma be filling out the full 70
i really shoulda included the wrecking crew on my top 60s artist list shouldn't i
Them or just Phil
I'm not sure if I ever stopped using this catchphrase since Tommy Boy came out NGL

@Galaxy when do you plan on doing the half decade list?
In like a month I'll probably announce it
In like a month I'll probably announce it
would you mind it if I'd start a film poll or do you think that it would be too much collision? Guessing you won't stop taking lists until at least February
would you mind it if I'd start a film poll or do you think that it would be too much collision? Guessing you won't stop taking lists until at least February
Brother I'm not in charge of you
You can vote up to 70 directors but you should at least vote for 15 directors.
the lists should be ranked and numbered.
Example:
1. Alfred Hitchcock
2. Ingmar Bergman
3. Martin Scorsese
4. ...
weighted counting. The first few places get more points as the differences fizzle out towards the backhalf of the list.
It's possible to vote for any director. Like if you are a fan of someone who does mostly documentaries you can also vote for them.
As for directors whose name starts with their surname just type them in the way they would be typed in their native language. example: Park Chan-wook NOT Chan-wook Park. But please check the "correct" english spelling (for example: Andrei Tarkovsky, not Andreij Tarkowskij).
if there are two directors with the same name please specifiy them with their birth date. If you don't know it's fine (no one is able to know every filmmaker) but if you do it would help. Otherwise I'll be asking anyway.
edits will be accepted until at least January 24th
@arel @beach_kneega @branmalt @Bourbon_Ben @Bizzle @demo @drjdeponytail @Elric @Einfinet @Fella @Galaxy @Jerry_Seinfeld
You can vote up to 70 directors but you should at least vote for 15 directors.
the lists should be ranked and numbered.
Example:
1. Alfred Hitchcock
2. Ingmar Bergman
3. Martin Scorsese
4. ...
weighted counting. The first few places get more points as the differences fizzle out towards the backhalf of the list.
It's possible to vote for any director. Like if you are a fan of someone who does mostly documentaries you can also vote for them.
As for directors whose name starts with their surname just type them in the way they would be typed in their native language. example: Park Chan-wook NOT Chan-wook Park. But please check the "correct" english spelling (for example: Andrei Tarkovsky, not Andreij Tarkowskij).
if there are two directors with the same name please specifiy them with their birth date. If you don't know it's fine (no one is able to know every filmmaker) but if you do it would help. Otherwise I'll be asking anyway.
edits will be accepted until at least January 24th
@arel @beach_kneega @branmalt @Bourbon_Ben @Bizzle @demo @drjdeponytail @Elric @Einfinet @Fella @Galaxy @Jerry_Seinfeld
an Aruji list
dawn of a new era. i cant participate though unfortunately
id maybe recommend counting different though. since those current weights might give a lot more weight to lower, more common placements than rarer but high placements.
just a thought
that would sound actually cool if we would be doing 1910s (or 20s just to get the 100) to 2020s directors.
decade list would be a terrible amount of work. All time list would probably be easier but still. The director poll seems the most managable.
As much as I would like to take votes in my Best __ Of Each Year threads it would also be a terrible amount of work. Especially songs after like 1965 when things branched out so much that everybody would have a totally different looking list
f*** all that counting
an Aruji list
dawn of a new era. i cant participate though unfortunately
id maybe recommend counting different though. since those current weights might give a lot more weight to lower, more common placements than rarer but high placements.
just a thought
was thinking about the same thing but if you're able to make a list of 70 directors wouldn't you want the lower placements to receive more points than just 1? But yeah I get what you're saying. Thought about doing it in a way that the amount of directors matters but weighing each list differently would be kinda silly.
was thinking about the same thing but if you're able to make a list of 70 directors wouldn't you want the lower placements to receive more points than just 1? But yeah I get what you're saying. Thought about doing it in a way that the amount of directors matters but weighing each list differently would be kinda silly.
i havent seen nearly enough films to make a top 10 directors list, let alone 30, sorry m8
was thinking about the same thing but if you're able to make a list of 70 directors wouldn't you want the lower placements to receive more points than just 1? But yeah I get what you're saying. Thought about doing it in a way that the amount of directors matters but weighing each list differently would be kinda silly.
yeah more than 1.
but one 1st place ranking probably shouldnt be outweighed by two 50th place rankings. for example
should one 1st place ranking even be outweighed by like five 50th place rankings? 10? much to think about
one example. bored so whipped this up. do whatever though lol
With this weight:
1. 100
2. 85
3. 78
4. 72
5. 66
6. 61
7. 56
8. 51
9. 47
10. 43
11. 40
12. 37
13. 34
14. 31
15. 29
16. 26
17. 24
18. 22
19. 21
20. 19
21. 19
22. 18
23. 18
24. 18
25. 18
26. 18
27. 18
28. 17
29. 17
30. 17
31. 17
32. 17
33. 17
34. 16
35. 16
36. 16
37. 16
38. 16
39. 16
40. 15
41. 15
42. 15
43. 15
44. 15
45. 15
46. 15
47. 14
48. 14
49. 14
50. 14
51. 14
52. 14
53. 14
54. 13
55. 13
56. 13
57. 13
58. 13
59. 13
60. 13
61. 12
62. 12
63. 12
64. 12
65. 12
66. 12
67. 12
68. 12
69. 12
70. 11