I agree, the father is probably traumatized

taking something that you can’t give back is life altering, it’s sad he was even put in this situation to begin with

the same way I can empathize with the dude who got shot is the same way people need to be empathizing with the father for having to protect his daughter and anyone else in his house.

he’s trolling bro lol I didn’t realize it either

Nigga got hit with a three piece

You personally know 10 women who were murdered? Stop the cap

bruh said
"this is not a larger problem, this is a clear cut example of the castle doctrine"

do u think "this" = judge jury executioner society has problems blah blah, or do u think "this" = the situation where a dude shot a guy trying to break in. u can find a hint in the 2nd part of the sentence

i pray he's AI

I see the perspective of protecting your family in a country where women get found unrecognizable after going missing for weeks

But you got it bro maybe i’m shooting my empathy in the wrong direction

It's insane to me that people are defending him shooting two more shots after he started running away

Americans rly just bloodthirsty waiting for a moment to use their guns

you shoot until the threat is neutralized

you’re clearly not American so why are you projecting your holier than thou bullshit onto people who are?

I made it very simple for him too smh

you’re clearly not American so why are you projecting your holier than thou bullshit onto people who are?

Niggas just typing on here

Keep the same energy when the police gets freaked out when you go for license and registration bozo

Fr tho cops being trigger happy is a result of americans being so trigger happy in general, idk how they don't see the connection

if someone is breaking into your house, they are also capable and willing to use violence against you. this has nothing to do with “judge jury and executioner” that logic is used more for vigilante justice not someone that is an active and imminent threat to you.

All I hear is a bunch of Kyle rittenhouse.

this is what I meant when I referred to the left

how do u not see the connxn between ur previous post and what sega goon doin

Which is scary for us Latinos, blacks and Asians brethren

guy 1 says this death is in part due to the mindset being a large cultural provlem

guy 2 says "no this isnt a problem this is clear cut castle doctrine"

i say that the existence of a law does not mean that something is or is not a social problem

the rebuttal here is that the judge jury executioer mindset doesn't apply here because this is castle doctrine but these aren't mutually exclusive events. you can be justified to kill someone under castle doctrine but does that mean you should?

what happens if we take this to a hypothetical where the castle doctrine doesnt exist. what's then the argument to make that there isn't a problem in the judge jury executioner mindset? the existence of castle doctrine is not proving anything

Americans rly just bloodthirsty waiting for a moment to use their guns sounds like a good reason to be on edge and expecting the worse

considering everyone in this video lives in america

So is that a justification to shoot some scrawny unarmed kid twice in the back as he's running away?

once again you numbskull

my retort to this was the wider social problem is women being murdered by their ex partners

but you fail to mention this again and again

i just said using the existence of a law to prove or disprove a social problem is a bad argument

i don't know why you're bringing in all this extraneous info