Idk if you guys kept up with this, but the FBI literally had a guy inside instigating this plot lol. Now they're saying that guy was a "double agent"
What makes you think that he's not a double agent?
What makes you think that he's not a double agent?
He's been working with cops/intelligence as an informant since the 80s and got a sweetheart deal while being characterized as a double agent and terrorist plotter. Don't be gullible.
He's been working with cops/intelligence as an informant since the 80s and got a sweetheart deal while being characterized as a double agent and terrorist plotter. Don't be gullible.
Mf i didn't keep up with this story i was just asking a question lmao
Mf i didn't keep up with this story i was just asking a question lmao
I thought you read that thread and seriously asked me that lol. My bad
Idk if you guys kept up with this, but the FBI literally had a guy inside instigating this plot lol. Now they're saying that guy was a "double agent"
classic
lol i haven't followed this at all since the story first broke
great twitter user to follow
lotta good info
great twitter user to follow
lotta good info
"buT bOTh siDeS aRe BAd"
yes, american politics features prominently two sides which are bad.
y'all qaeda
bro this is too funny
white supremacist really think they got the superior genetics when most of their faces not even symmetric
white supremacist really think they got the superior genetics when most of their faces not even symmetric
this terrorist brand of white Look like inbreds
no words
its all fake, all psyops, all spooks instigating strategy of tension...
its all fake, all psyops, all spooks instigating strategy of tension...
im skeptical of that, because, with this logic, you can say any mass movement/attack is somehow a fed op due to degrees of association with CIs, which exist in every "counter-cultural" movement to an extent, and every nation-state gives anti-gov radicals handjobs to destabilize their perceived rivals for their own internal interests, mainly on the basis of ideological similarities (this strategy was quite infamously used to wage proxy wars during the Cold War)
i don't buy this right-wing adoption of manufacturing consent rhetoric to absolve responsibility of their own sins, and this is the current narrative, "the spooks made me do it, im innocent"
do feds let s*** happen? yes, way too much, 9/11 and OKC come to mind
does it absolve these people of their own responsibility considering they were actively radicalized enough to actively plan something, as with the case discussed in OP? no
im skeptical of that, because, with this logic, you can say any mass movement/attack is somehow a fed op due to degrees of association with CIs, which exist in every "counter-cultural" movement to an extent, and every nation-state gives anti-gov radicals handjobs to destabilize their perceived rivals for their own internal interests, mainly on the basis of ideological similarities (this strategy was quite infamously used to wage proxy wars during the Cold War)
i don't buy this right-wing adoption of manufacturing consent rhetoric to absolve responsibility of their own sins, and this is the current narrative, "the spooks made me do it, im innocent"
do feds let s*** happen? yes, way too much, 9/11 and OKC come to mind
does it absolve these people of their own responsibility considering they were actively radicalized enough to actively plan something, as with the case discussed in OP? no
I was being hyperbolic a bit, I agree with what you’re saying, there is a lot of throw the stone and hide your hand going on when it comes to this sort of thing from partisans
in this specific case though the active planning is inextricable from the involvement of the feds, it’s about as blatant an example of what I invoke as possible