Reply
  • Jan 10
    Lu The Ruler

    This is just karma for Drake.
    Drop the law suit against UMG related to the beef, I bet Drake walks away with this untouched due to the positive karma alone

  • idk who adin ross is but i can tell from Drake's music that he's a great guy. if drake has every form of entertainment at his beck and call and chooses to spend his time gambling, then normal people like us are more lucky than anything to have access to the same opportunity.

    we should be thanking drake, not suing him.

  • NothingIs

    @op updates

    https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey

    https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342

    If Drake has a million bots💯🤖, then I’m one of them🦾. If Drake has one1️⃣ bot, then I’m the one bot1️⃣🤖. If Drake has no bots then I am dead☠️.

  • Apr 27
    ·
    7 replies
    NothingIs

    @op updates

    https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey

    https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342

    100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses

  • Apr 27

    Drakebots?

    every accusation is projection

  • Apr 27
    ·
    1 reply

    Been saying bad bunny the real drake nobody in Puerto Rico was playing the drake part in Mia at all

  • truly 🥶
    Apr 27
    Benny Boy

    100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses

    thats cuz drake resonates with EVERYONE

    thats why 100,000,000 people have no addresses even the homeless folk are waiting for iceman

  • Apr 28
    ·
    1 reply
    Benny Boy

    100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses

    this is where Drake is getting all his streams

  • Does this mean the Drake popularity is artificial?

  • Apr 28
    ·
    1 reply
    Benny Boy

    100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses

    The Boy is big in the rail yards of America

  • Apr 28
    ·
    1 reply
    ASAKI

    The Boy is big in the rail yards of America

    This avi is incredible

  • LetHIMSortEmOut

    This avi is incredible

    Big steppa

  • “ Federal RICO class action lawsuit” instead of some dumb nigga who lost money on stake is insane media games

  • NothingIs

    @op updates

    https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey

    https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342

    Dbots

  • Kr0niic ☘️
    Apr 28
    ·
    1 reply

    Phase 3: Bots Inflate Drake’s Streaming
    127. On information and belief, a substantial percentage of Drakes’s Spotify streams
    between January 2022 and September 2025 were inauthentic and appeared to be the work of a
    sprawling network of Bot Accounts.
    Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 23 of 38 PageID# 66
    24
    128. On information and belief, Drake’s music streams reflect abnormal VPN usage,
    seemingly designed to obscure the true geographic origins of the Bot Accounts that were streaming
    his songs. For example, Plaintiff is informed and believes that over a four-day period in 2024, at
    least 250,000 streams of Drake’s song “No Face” originated in Turkey, but were falsely
    geomapped through the coordinated use of VPNs to the United Kingdom in attempt to obscure
    their origins.
    129. On information and belief, a large percentage of the accounts streaming Drake’s
    music were geographically concentrated around areas whose populations could not support the
    volume of streams emanating therefrom. In some cases, massive amounts of music streams, more
    than a hundred million streams, originated in areas with zero residential addresses.
    130. On information and belief, Geohash data shows that nearly 10% of Drake’s streams
    come from users whose location data showed that they traveled a minimum of 15,000 kilometers
    in a month, moved unreasonable locations between songs (consecutive plays separated by mere
    seconds but spanning thousands of kilometers), including more than 500 kilometers between songs
    (roughly the distance from New York City to Pittsburgh).
    131. On information and belief, between January 2022 and September 2025, the volume
    and timing of the music streams for Drake’s music failed to follow typical, established streaming
    patterns. While most songs and/or albums see an initial spike in streaming immediately upon
    release, those same songs/albums typically follow a predictable decay pattern over the following
    months. However, in many instances, the streams of Drake’s music on Spotify saw significant and
    irregular uptick months—and in some cases years—after the release of his songs, with no
    reasonable explanations for those upticks other than streaming fraud. In other instances, Drake’s
    decay rate was slower and less dramatic when compared to those of his contemporaries.
    Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 24 of 38 PageID# 67
    25
    132. Additionally, the number of streams of Drake’s music attributable to individual
    accounts is staggering and irregular. For instance, on information and belief, while the average
    Spotify listener listens to 10 songs per day, a massive amount of the accounts listening to Drake’s
    music (Drake’s “users”) listened exclusively to Drake’s music for 23 hours a day.
    133. On information and belief, less than 2% of Drake’s listeners on Spotify account for
    roughly 15% of his overall streams. And roughly 9% of his streams are attributable to less than
    1% of his users. As a result, Drake’s music accumulated far higher total streams compared to other
    highly-streamed artists, even though those artists had far more “users” than Drake.
    134. As a result of the fraudulent streaming scheme described above, with respect to
    Drake’s music, the Rights holders of Drake’s music (Drake and his company, Frozen Moments,
    LLC) saw their shares of the revenue pool substantially and artificially increased. This generated
    significant revenues for Drake and Frozen Moments, LLC, all at the expense of other Rights
    holders whose shares and revenues were greatly diminished.
    135. The amount of streaming revenue that would otherwise have been distributed to
    legitimate Rights holders but for the fraudulent boosting of Drake’s music is estimated to be in the
    hundreds of millions of dollars

  • Benny Boy

    100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses

    Drake tends to appeal to businessmen and people who don’t have permanent residences

  • Apr 28
    ·
    1 reply
    NothingIs

    @op updates

    https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey

    https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342

    Lets not start a drake streaming bot narrative it was ridiculous when they said kendrick did it too. Botting spotify is hard and goes directly against spotify interest they would have cracked down if this was real. Just sounds very weak

  • kurapika

    Lets not start a drake streaming bot narrative it was ridiculous when they said kendrick did it too. Botting spotify is hard and goes directly against spotify interest they would have cracked down if this was real. Just sounds very weak

    certain artists have been caught botting streams for years

    certain artists are simply victims of being put in editorial and user created playlists that are botted by external forces

    you can't call it tbh

    but i sincerely doubt even if Drake does have a significant amount of botted streams, it is Drake himself, but the record label botting streams like they do for tons of other artists

  • bmass 🇵🇭
    Apr 28
    ·
    1 reply
    Urameshii

    Been saying bad bunny the real drake nobody in Puerto Rico was playing the drake part in Mia at all

    this doesnt make sense but I fw what u tried to say

  • Apr 28
    ·
    2 replies
    bmass

    this doesnt make sense but I fw what u tried to say

    Came out wrong 😅 what people think drake is Bad Bunny is him! The global superstar and all

  • bmass 🇵🇭
    Apr 28
    Urameshii

    Came out wrong 😅 what people think drake is Bad Bunny is him! The global superstar and all

    spitting

  • Apr 28
    ·
    7 replies
    Urameshii

    Came out wrong 😅 what people think drake is Bad Bunny is him! The global superstar and all

    bad bunnny is about as global as my left nut

  • Apr 28
    ·
    1 reply
    Kr0niic

    Phase 3: Bots Inflate Drake’s Streaming
    127. On information and belief, a substantial percentage of Drakes’s Spotify streams
    between January 2022 and September 2025 were inauthentic and appeared to be the work of a
    sprawling network of Bot Accounts.
    Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 23 of 38 PageID# 66
    24
    128. On information and belief, Drake’s music streams reflect abnormal VPN usage,
    seemingly designed to obscure the true geographic origins of the Bot Accounts that were streaming
    his songs. For example, Plaintiff is informed and believes that over a four-day period in 2024, at
    least 250,000 streams of Drake’s song “No Face” originated in Turkey, but were falsely
    geomapped through the coordinated use of VPNs to the United Kingdom in attempt to obscure
    their origins.
    129. On information and belief, a large percentage of the accounts streaming Drake’s
    music were geographically concentrated around areas whose populations could not support the
    volume of streams emanating therefrom. In some cases, massive amounts of music streams, more
    than a hundred million streams, originated in areas with zero residential addresses.
    130. On information and belief, Geohash data shows that nearly 10% of Drake’s streams
    come from users whose location data showed that they traveled a minimum of 15,000 kilometers
    in a month, moved unreasonable locations between songs (consecutive plays separated by mere
    seconds but spanning thousands of kilometers), including more than 500 kilometers between songs
    (roughly the distance from New York City to Pittsburgh).
    131. On information and belief, between January 2022 and September 2025, the volume
    and timing of the music streams for Drake’s music failed to follow typical, established streaming
    patterns. While most songs and/or albums see an initial spike in streaming immediately upon
    release, those same songs/albums typically follow a predictable decay pattern over the following
    months. However, in many instances, the streams of Drake’s music on Spotify saw significant and
    irregular uptick months—and in some cases years—after the release of his songs, with no
    reasonable explanations for those upticks other than streaming fraud. In other instances, Drake’s
    decay rate was slower and less dramatic when compared to those of his contemporaries.
    Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 24 of 38 PageID# 67
    25
    132. Additionally, the number of streams of Drake’s music attributable to individual
    accounts is staggering and irregular. For instance, on information and belief, while the average
    Spotify listener listens to 10 songs per day, a massive amount of the accounts listening to Drake’s
    music (Drake’s “users”) listened exclusively to Drake’s music for 23 hours a day.
    133. On information and belief, less than 2% of Drake’s listeners on Spotify account for
    roughly 15% of his overall streams. And roughly 9% of his streams are attributable to less than
    1% of his users. As a result, Drake’s music accumulated far higher total streams compared to other
    highly-streamed artists, even though those artists had far more “users” than Drake.
    134. As a result of the fraudulent streaming scheme described above, with respect to
    Drake’s music, the Rights holders of Drake’s music (Drake and his company, Frozen Moments,
    LLC) saw their shares of the revenue pool substantially and artificially increased. This generated
    significant revenues for Drake and Frozen Moments, LLC, all at the expense of other Rights
    holders whose shares and revenues were greatly diminished.
    135. The amount of streaming revenue that would otherwise have been distributed to
    legitimate Rights holders but for the fraudulent boosting of Drake’s music is estimated to be in the
    hundreds of millions of dollars

    This reads to me is that they are considering anyone using a VPN or paying for Turkey YouTube Music (cheaper) to be a bot. The argument seems very weak