This is just karma for Drake.
Drop the law suit against UMG related to the beef, I bet Drake walks away with this untouched due to the positive karma alone

idk who adin ross is but i can tell from Drake's music that he's a great guy. if drake has every form of entertainment at his beck and call and chooses to spend his time gambling, then normal people like us are more lucky than anything to have access to the same opportunity.
we should be thanking drake, not suing him.
@op updates
https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey
https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342If Drake has a million bots💯🤖, then I’m one of them🦾. If Drake has one1️⃣ bot, then I’m the one bot1️⃣🤖. If Drake has no bots then I am dead☠️.
@op updates
https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey
https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses
Been saying bad bunny the real drake nobody in Puerto Rico was playing the drake part in Mia at all
100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses
thats cuz drake resonates with EVERYONE
thats why 100,000,000 people have no addresses even the homeless folk are waiting for iceman
100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses
this is where Drake is getting all his streams

100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses
The Boy is big in the rail yards of America
“ Federal RICO class action lawsuit” instead of some dumb nigga who lost money on stake is insane media games
@op updates
https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey
https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342Dbots
Phase 3: Bots Inflate Drake’s Streaming
127. On information and belief, a substantial percentage of Drakes’s Spotify streams
between January 2022 and September 2025 were inauthentic and appeared to be the work of a
sprawling network of Bot Accounts.
Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 23 of 38 PageID# 66
24
128. On information and belief, Drake’s music streams reflect abnormal VPN usage,
seemingly designed to obscure the true geographic origins of the Bot Accounts that were streaming
his songs. For example, Plaintiff is informed and believes that over a four-day period in 2024, at
least 250,000 streams of Drake’s song “No Face” originated in Turkey, but were falsely
geomapped through the coordinated use of VPNs to the United Kingdom in attempt to obscure
their origins.
129. On information and belief, a large percentage of the accounts streaming Drake’s
music were geographically concentrated around areas whose populations could not support the
volume of streams emanating therefrom. In some cases, massive amounts of music streams, more
than a hundred million streams, originated in areas with zero residential addresses.
130. On information and belief, Geohash data shows that nearly 10% of Drake’s streams
come from users whose location data showed that they traveled a minimum of 15,000 kilometers
in a month, moved unreasonable locations between songs (consecutive plays separated by mere
seconds but spanning thousands of kilometers), including more than 500 kilometers between songs
(roughly the distance from New York City to Pittsburgh).
131. On information and belief, between January 2022 and September 2025, the volume
and timing of the music streams for Drake’s music failed to follow typical, established streaming
patterns. While most songs and/or albums see an initial spike in streaming immediately upon
release, those same songs/albums typically follow a predictable decay pattern over the following
months. However, in many instances, the streams of Drake’s music on Spotify saw significant and
irregular uptick months—and in some cases years—after the release of his songs, with no
reasonable explanations for those upticks other than streaming fraud. In other instances, Drake’s
decay rate was slower and less dramatic when compared to those of his contemporaries.
Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 24 of 38 PageID# 67
25
132. Additionally, the number of streams of Drake’s music attributable to individual
accounts is staggering and irregular. For instance, on information and belief, while the average
Spotify listener listens to 10 songs per day, a massive amount of the accounts listening to Drake’s
music (Drake’s “users”) listened exclusively to Drake’s music for 23 hours a day.
133. On information and belief, less than 2% of Drake’s listeners on Spotify account for
roughly 15% of his overall streams. And roughly 9% of his streams are attributable to less than
1% of his users. As a result, Drake’s music accumulated far higher total streams compared to other
highly-streamed artists, even though those artists had far more “users” than Drake.
134. As a result of the fraudulent streaming scheme described above, with respect to
Drake’s music, the Rights holders of Drake’s music (Drake and his company, Frozen Moments,
LLC) saw their shares of the revenue pool substantially and artificially increased. This generated
significant revenues for Drake and Frozen Moments, LLC, all at the expense of other Rights
holders whose shares and revenues were greatly diminished.
135. The amount of streaming revenue that would otherwise have been distributed to
legitimate Rights holders but for the fraudulent boosting of Drake’s music is estimated to be in the
hundreds of millions of dollars
100,000,000 streams from locations with zero residential addresses
Drake tends to appeal to businessmen and people who don’t have permanent residences
@op updates
https://www.complex.com/music/a/kris-seavers/drake-adin-ross-stake-gambling-lawsuit-new-jersey
https://twitter.com/stanademikstv/status/2048835909173285342Lets not start a drake streaming bot narrative it was ridiculous when they said kendrick did it too. Botting spotify is hard and goes directly against spotify interest they would have cracked down if this was real. Just sounds very weak
Lets not start a drake streaming bot narrative it was ridiculous when they said kendrick did it too. Botting spotify is hard and goes directly against spotify interest they would have cracked down if this was real. Just sounds very weak
certain artists have been caught botting streams for years
certain artists are simply victims of being put in editorial and user created playlists that are botted by external forces
you can't call it tbh
but i sincerely doubt even if Drake does have a significant amount of botted streams, it is Drake himself, but the record label botting streams like they do for tons of other artists
Been saying bad bunny the real drake nobody in Puerto Rico was playing the drake part in Mia at all
this doesnt make sense but I fw what u tried to say
this doesnt make sense but I fw what u tried to say
Came out wrong 😅 what people think drake is Bad Bunny is him! The global superstar and all
Came out wrong 😅 what people think drake is Bad Bunny is him! The global superstar and all
spitting
Came out wrong 😅 what people think drake is Bad Bunny is him! The global superstar and all
bad bunnny is about as global as my left nut
Phase 3: Bots Inflate Drake’s Streaming
127. On information and belief, a substantial percentage of Drakes’s Spotify streams
between January 2022 and September 2025 were inauthentic and appeared to be the work of a
sprawling network of Bot Accounts.
Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 23 of 38 PageID# 66
24
128. On information and belief, Drake’s music streams reflect abnormal VPN usage,
seemingly designed to obscure the true geographic origins of the Bot Accounts that were streaming
his songs. For example, Plaintiff is informed and believes that over a four-day period in 2024, at
least 250,000 streams of Drake’s song “No Face” originated in Turkey, but were falsely
geomapped through the coordinated use of VPNs to the United Kingdom in attempt to obscure
their origins.
129. On information and belief, a large percentage of the accounts streaming Drake’s
music were geographically concentrated around areas whose populations could not support the
volume of streams emanating therefrom. In some cases, massive amounts of music streams, more
than a hundred million streams, originated in areas with zero residential addresses.
130. On information and belief, Geohash data shows that nearly 10% of Drake’s streams
come from users whose location data showed that they traveled a minimum of 15,000 kilometers
in a month, moved unreasonable locations between songs (consecutive plays separated by mere
seconds but spanning thousands of kilometers), including more than 500 kilometers between songs
(roughly the distance from New York City to Pittsburgh).
131. On information and belief, between January 2022 and September 2025, the volume
and timing of the music streams for Drake’s music failed to follow typical, established streaming
patterns. While most songs and/or albums see an initial spike in streaming immediately upon
release, those same songs/albums typically follow a predictable decay pattern over the following
months. However, in many instances, the streams of Drake’s music on Spotify saw significant and
irregular uptick months—and in some cases years—after the release of his songs, with no
reasonable explanations for those upticks other than streaming fraud. In other instances, Drake’s
decay rate was slower and less dramatic when compared to those of his contemporaries.
Case 1:25-cv-02511-LMB-WEF Document 9 Filed 02/24/26 Page 24 of 38 PageID# 67
25
132. Additionally, the number of streams of Drake’s music attributable to individual
accounts is staggering and irregular. For instance, on information and belief, while the average
Spotify listener listens to 10 songs per day, a massive amount of the accounts listening to Drake’s
music (Drake’s “users”) listened exclusively to Drake’s music for 23 hours a day.
133. On information and belief, less than 2% of Drake’s listeners on Spotify account for
roughly 15% of his overall streams. And roughly 9% of his streams are attributable to less than
1% of his users. As a result, Drake’s music accumulated far higher total streams compared to other
highly-streamed artists, even though those artists had far more “users” than Drake.
134. As a result of the fraudulent streaming scheme described above, with respect to
Drake’s music, the Rights holders of Drake’s music (Drake and his company, Frozen Moments,
LLC) saw their shares of the revenue pool substantially and artificially increased. This generated
significant revenues for Drake and Frozen Moments, LLC, all at the expense of other Rights
holders whose shares and revenues were greatly diminished.
135. The amount of streaming revenue that would otherwise have been distributed to
legitimate Rights holders but for the fraudulent boosting of Drake’s music is estimated to be in the
hundreds of millions of dollars
This reads to me is that they are considering anyone using a VPN or paying for Turkey YouTube Music (cheaper) to be a bot. The argument seems very weak