Lol I’m assuming you never read the book
Nah but it's on my to do list
Per the description it's alot more from Booths perspective ain't it?
Nah but it's on my to do list
Per the description it's alot more from Booths perspective ain't it?
Yeah basically all of that is in the book, the psychopath, what happened to his wife. Etc
Yeah basically all of that is in the book, the psychopath, what happened to his wife. Etc
The fact it’s QT first novel makes this a must read for me
The fact it’s QT first novel makes this a must read for me
enjoy it, I thought it was a really fun read
The fact it’s QT first novel makes this a must read for me
Facts you gotta read to succeed
Fincher and Tarantino feel so different in style that I have a hard time imagining what this could be like unless Fincher will just be adopting Tarantino’s style
Fincher and Tarantino feel so different in style that I have a hard time imagining what this could be like unless Fincher will just be adopting Tarantino’s style
It’s definitely gonna be one of the more interesting, high level industry experiments that we’ll see in our time
“The Big Sleep,” the Raymond Chandler adaptation starring Humphrey Bogart, is in the same world as “Farewell, My Lovely,” the 1975 Robert Mitchum movie, because they play the same character in that movie. But it’s different actors, different directors, and a different time in the storyline. They’re different.“
Lmao they are still trying to claim it’s not a sequel, but it’s the same actor, same creator/writer just different director so this example doesn’t work.
“The Big Sleep,” the Raymond Chandler adaptation starring Humphrey Bogart, is in the same world as “Farewell, My Lovely,” the 1975 Robert Mitchum movie, because they play the same character in that movie. But it’s different actors, different directors, and a different time in the storyline. They’re different.“
Lmao they are still trying to claim it’s not a sequel, but it’s the same actor, same creator/writer just different director so this example doesn’t work.
Why are they so scared of calling it a sequel? Wouldn’t that be better marketing as well?
Wait u can just make sequels of another directors movie?!
Yeah look at The Hustler & Color of Money
Why are they so scared of calling it a sequel? Wouldn’t that be better marketing as well?
I think it's more accurately a spin-off set in the world of the original movie, and they don't want to give people the wrong idea that it's a direct sequel in the traditional sense
Yeah look at The Hustler & Color of Money
That’s not a sequel. Just a follow up with one of the same characters in the same universe.
I thought this s*** was an April Fools joke
For real bro lol. This s*** doesn’t even make sense. And after Alien 3, I thought David Fincher sworn off ever doing sequels.
That’s not a sequel. Just a follow up with one of the same characters in the same universe.
Bro suck the skin off my d*** b****
For real bro lol. This s*** doesn’t even make sense. And after Alien 3, I thought David Fincher sworn off ever doing sequels.
This would be for Netflix and Fincher seems to have a great working relationship with them: "The Killer" and "Mank" were released there (RIP to Mindhunter too)
Why are they so scared of calling it a sequel? Wouldn’t that be better marketing as well?
Exactly. Lol so I have no idea
Why are they so scared of calling it a sequel? Wouldn’t that be better marketing as well?
I'm thinking if it was labeled a full on sequel it would prolly get alot more backlash for not bringing back Leo
Not to mention I suspect the tone and vibe is gonna be way different
Why are they so scared of calling it a sequel? Wouldn’t that be better marketing as well?
sequel is a dirty word with a bad connotation
as a horror fan I cannot relate tho
Why are they so scared of calling it a sequel? Wouldn’t that be better marketing as well?
think about just the simple differences in how tarantino depicts violence vs fincher i understand making a carful distinction that this will not be continuation of that world per say