mjpplus

4y

Damn, Skinny Party a rare sight to see

spongebob

4y

it wouldn’t be strong at all but i guess they could try to flip it

it kinda communicates that he’s willing to… you know… do what he said… to people

whippet volverse

4y

i don't know if he really got "scammed" or tricked, I think that the majority of Subsidiary record labels probably work the same way tbh.
people just don't care to look into them

Culture

4y

The POWER 105 interview can be used as defense that he has no issues with Lucci lol

All this is weak AF

they’re hoping someone rats

Silas

4y

yea I dont think yall really understand this case

YFN Lucci is also being charged with a RICO

He's been beefing with YFN Lucci for a minute and even threaten him on social media

They got wiretaps of him talking about going to war and got evidence of him renting the car that killed Donovan Thomas (Hes one of the guys that put YFN Lucci on and the main spark of their beef)

They have evidence of YSL associates engaging in criminal activity against YFN associates and hes the face of YSL

RICO was literally made for some of the stuff hes doing.

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

lewinskysdress

4y

not surprising

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

lil ufo

4y

can anyone explain to me why jack harlow is mentioned ?

Silas

4y

basically there was a running joke on twitter that was naming a bunch of ppl as being part of YSL.

Jack Harlow was one of them and a reporter probably thought it was for real and asked the DA why he wasnt part of the case in the press conference.

another example of how powerful social media can be these days.

krishna bound

4y

yeah i'm sure this is the norm in the industry tbh

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

krishna bound

4y

· edited

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

hottie

4y

yeah it doesn't really seem like they have much direct evidence of him committing these crimes, it's gonna come down to what they can convince a judge and jury.

i feel like a good lawyer can put together a very strong argument for thug tho. no way he does more than 5

vayla

4y

Gunna will 100% snitch

Culture

4y

Thug is not the face of YSL SMM bloods lol

The wiretap insinuates that others ordered something to happen to YFN from prison

Thug is the face of the label

lil ufo

4y

can anyone explain to me why jack harlow is mentioned ?

lewinskysdress

4y

a bunch of experienced people taking advantage of people from the streets with no business acumen