Reply
  • Apr 8, 2024

  • neon 🍄
    Apr 9, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    ilgnd

    Well it was done a lotttttt better.

    No excuse tbh

    they aren't even finished with the CGI yet probably

    watch early Fury Road trailers

  • neon 🍄
    Apr 9, 2024
    ·
    2 replies

    imagine doubting George Miller

  • Apr 9, 2024
    neon

    they aren't even finished with the CGI yet probably

    watch early Fury Road trailers

    ehhhh. movie's not THAT far out. what we're seeing is close to what we're getting.

    but it's not that it's CGI. they're just like ... doing a lot more outlandish things than the first in a way. Fury Road (somehow) felt grounded -- or at least, more grounded than this looks like it's gonna be.

  • Apr 9, 2024

    Think this will be good?

  • Apr 9, 2024
    neon

    imagine doubting George Miller

  • Apr 9, 2024
    ·
    2 replies

    Maybe CGI was improved?

  • Apr 9, 2024
    Mac Wit Da Cheese

    Maybe CGI was improved?

    https://twitter.com/discussingfilm/status/1777840590899581381

  • Apr 9, 2024
  • Apr 9, 2024
  • Apr 9, 2024

    minor plot details, kinda hard to spoil this movie with it being a prequel but

    twitter.com/anyafolders/status/1777846970209456590?s=46&t=TMJcjQGFskRRM37dfab5rg

  • Apr 10, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    These trailers look awful.

    Are y’all watching the same thing as me?

    CGI looks cheap as hell.

  • Apr 10, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Ckultgen

    These trailers look awful.

    Are y’all watching the same thing as me?

    CGI looks cheap as hell.

    no it doesnt

    the CGI just has flair to it. Nothing about this movie looks cheap. Y'all are so brainwashed by Marvel's soulless but polished CGI

  • Apr 10, 2024
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    neon

    imagine doubting George Miller

    Fr imagine being a Mad Max 1+2, Witches of Eastwick stan back in the day and just when you thought George was slipping he hits you with not one but two Babes, then not one but two Happy Feet

  • Apr 10, 2024
    ·
    2 replies
    TheInstigator

    no it doesnt

    the CGI just has flair to it. Nothing about this movie looks cheap. Y'all are so brainwashed by Marvel's soulless but polished CGI

    Yes it does.

    This looks like The Hobbit vs LOTR.

    Newer CGI ≠ better

    It looks cheap.

  • Apr 10, 2024
    ·
    edited
    Ckultgen

    Yes it does.

    This looks like The Hobbit vs LOTR.

    Newer CGI ≠ better

    It looks cheap.

    Fury Road's trailer also had a number of shots that were touched up or looked very different to the final film

    Regardless, it is delusional to compare these 2 films to LOTR vs Hobbit. Fury Road used a ton of CGI and compositing, way more than even LOTR. And we already know Furiousa used a ton of stuntwork and practical effects.

  • Apr 10, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Ckultgen

    Yes it does.

    This looks like The Hobbit vs LOTR.

    Newer CGI ≠ better

    It looks cheap.

    The hobbit has really good cgi tho

    Smaug, all the orcs. They look great

  • Apr 10, 2024
    Makaveli

    The hobbit has really good cgi tho

    Smaug, all the orcs. They look great

    The orcs looked like f***ing dogshit

  • Apr 10, 2024

    Actual people in makeup incalculably better

  • neon 🍄
    Apr 10, 2024
    Mac Wit Da Cheese

    Maybe CGI was improved?

    https://twitter.com/discussingfilm/status/1777840590899581381

    that's what I'm telling yall watch early fury road trailers they look worse

  • Apr 10, 2024
    Elric
    · edited

    Fr imagine being a Mad Max 1+2, Witches of Eastwick stan back in the day and just when you thought George was slipping he hits you with not one but two Babes, then not one but two Happy Feet

    This funny af

  • Apr 19, 2024
    ·
    edited
  • Apr 19, 2024

    this'll not live by its name

  • Apr 19, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
  • Apr 23, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
1
...
11
12
13
...
46