like there's no reason to believe that jay case. literally no reason for it to be a civil case instead of criminal.
supremely opportunistic timing. after diddy s*** people just want to hear big names in big scandals.
ppl dont care about truth its just about what entertains them more its sad
So, I'm of the opinion that we should give Jay the benefit of the doubt and watch the case play out.
That said, I think some clarity needs to be made about "civil cases."
Civil cases are sometimes a pre-cursor to a criminal trial so you can't automatically go by that. Jay wasn't even the main focus of that lawsuit. He was simply namedropped in a section of it.
Also, we should never rule things out with people in the industry no matter how great their image or rep is. Nobody truly knows what happened and Jay can be innocent or guilty.
Nobody should be jumping to conclusions on either side until more info is provided.
F*** heroes nigga if he did that s*** he deserve to be dragged down at the very LEAST
I disagree because there's no reason to believe that jay case. literally no reason for it to be a civil case instead of criminal.
supremely opportunistic timing. after diddy s*** people just want to hear big names in big scandals.
ppl dont care about truth its just about what entertains them more its sad
being a grown man with a hero
Idk about a “hero” but there’s absolutely nothing wrong with looking up to someone and studying the steps they took to achieve something
Whoa
Change the emoji in your name NOW!!!
hov is a pretty well documented scumbag who has routinely used people as pawns for his own personal gain.
he has also had this elitist stench to him for the last decade and a half or so since he became this 'mogul' and entered these michael rubin white party spaces.
simply put he's not a likable guy and I say this as someone who thinks he's probably the best emcee of all time and would probably put blueprint 1 in my personal top 5 of all time.
People are frothing over alleged sick & sad s***. This is all just entertainment and the most interesting thing going on in a lot of people’s lives. Never been a Jay fan outside of 444 but this doesn’t seem legit to me either. If he’s guilty f*** him. But people are weird for treating this like tv
most of these guys to it to themselves btw. you seldomly get to be in these kinds of positions without f***ing some people over and then once you're in the aforementioned positions you get afforded access to things and a lifestyle that will naturally make monsters out of most people.
doesn't mean you can't enjoy their work or find positives in them as people but if you're really looking for people to look up to you'll usually be able to find better examples in your own life than on a screen.
get better heroes? idk man this seems like a "you" problem.
You’re really on here all day hatin huh
So, I'm of the opinion that we should give Jay the benefit of the doubt and watch the case play out.
That said, I think some clarity needs to be made about "civil cases."
Civil cases are sometimes a pre-cursor to a criminal trial so you can't automatically go by that. Jay wasn't even the main focus of that lawsuit. He was simply namedropped in a section of it.
Also, we should never rule things out with people in the industry no matter how great their image or rep is. Nobody truly knows what happened and Jay can be innocent or guilty.
Nobody should be jumping to conclusions on either side until more info is provided.
Your perspective on Jay and the situation at hand opens up a broader conversation about the importance of patience and withholding judgment in cases like this. It’s a reminder of the complexity inherent in legal matters, particularly when distinguishing between civil and criminal proceedings. While some might argue that civil cases serve as a prelude to more serious criminal investigations, others might point out that such connections are not always straightforward, and every case needs to be considered within its unique context.
The inclusion of Jay in the lawsuit, as you mentioned, appears to be tangential rather than central. This nuance highlights how legal documents can involve individuals in varying degrees of significance, which often leads to misconceptions about their roles or culpability. It’s vital to approach such scenarios with an open mind, recognizing that the legal system operates on evidence and due process rather than public speculation or perception.
Furthermore, your point about the unpredictability of individuals in any industry is particularly compelling. In a world where public personas can be carefully curated, it becomes even more challenging to discern truth from appearance. This underscores the necessity of gathering all relevant facts before forming opinions. People, regardless of their public image or reputation, are ultimately human, capable of mistakes and misjudgments, yet also deserving of fairness and impartiality.
In the end, your call for restraint and the avoidance of premature conclusions is a sound one. As this case develops, more information will inevitably come to light, allowing for a fuller picture to emerge. Until then, maintaining a balanced perspective and focusing on the principles of justice and evidence will ensure that all parties are treated equitably. This measured approach not only upholds fairness but also fosters a deeper understanding of the situation for everyone involved.
Acting like these millionaires are your hero’s is crazy, especially a billionaire
Ion know about no 13 year old but he for sure was on some Diddy s*** too, y’all was quick on Diddy tho
Your perspective on Jay and the situation at hand opens up a broader conversation about the importance of patience and withholding judgment in cases like this. It’s a reminder of the complexity inherent in legal matters, particularly when distinguishing between civil and criminal proceedings. While some might argue that civil cases serve as a prelude to more serious criminal investigations, others might point out that such connections are not always straightforward, and every case needs to be considered within its unique context.
The inclusion of Jay in the lawsuit, as you mentioned, appears to be tangential rather than central. This nuance highlights how legal documents can involve individuals in varying degrees of significance, which often leads to misconceptions about their roles or culpability. It’s vital to approach such scenarios with an open mind, recognizing that the legal system operates on evidence and due process rather than public speculation or perception.
Furthermore, your point about the unpredictability of individuals in any industry is particularly compelling. In a world where public personas can be carefully curated, it becomes even more challenging to discern truth from appearance. This underscores the necessity of gathering all relevant facts before forming opinions. People, regardless of their public image or reputation, are ultimately human, capable of mistakes and misjudgments, yet also deserving of fairness and impartiality.
In the end, your call for restraint and the avoidance of premature conclusions is a sound one. As this case develops, more information will inevitably come to light, allowing for a fuller picture to emerge. Until then, maintaining a balanced perspective and focusing on the principles of justice and evidence will ensure that all parties are treated equitably. This measured approach not only upholds fairness but also fosters a deeper understanding of the situation for everyone involved.
Damn. I did not expect this AI level post from you of all people.
But I read it all and actually agree with most of what you said.
At sme point i start thnking it a me issue . Bowie ye and prince were my soundtrack thru middle school up to college and they all got allegations against them like damn ..
because people hate themselves and they wanna tear people down to make themselves feel better
thought jay z made you feel inadequate because is a billionaire with a sexy wife? well now he's accused of being a rapist so he's actually a bad person and you're good
like there's no reason to believe that jay case. literally no reason for it to be a civil case instead of criminal.
supremely opportunistic timing. after diddy s*** people just want to hear big names in big scandals.
ppl dont care about truth its just about what entertains them more its sad
What’s the statute of limitations in nyc for bringing a criminal case. My understanding for the age group it’s 20 years thus a criminal proceeding is not an option. I could be wrong.