Hard

Ehh, that would eliminate one problem but spawn 5 more

imagine twitters new terms of service requires two forms of government ID

Only bigots gonna disagree

what’s wrong with that?

I agree but leave forums out of it old man

terrible. i dont want everything attached to my birth name even if it is PC

this thread gon be fun

personally Im thinking things like it being overreach by a private company, issues of liability for things like hacks, and just general... why? Lets just say this was implemented. Section 230 makes it so that sites like twitter dont have to do s***. Theyre not responsible for what anyone says legally speaking. How would this change anything?

Dumb f***ing trend. No the internet should not be only for those that are willing to be identified, what a dumb f***ing take in general. This ain't even personal I'm pretty open and have my full name on most my s***

nah my p*** burner accounts are too important

idris elba says F*** your burner account

The best part of this take is that it implies that people don’t regularly post awful s*** under their real names

this is such a bad idea lol

Drop some links boy

Forreal

facebook asked me for ID
youtube too

If you aren’t posting racist or homophobic s*** then you shouldn’t have to worry

i would support it if twitter wasnt a privately owned company with no oversight

u KNOW ur data is gonna get sold even more

every time i see ur post it's stupid bait like this

if cowards are being supported by a veil of privacy... Then social media is not a safe space

... And yet the veil of privacy is what makes it a safe space.

trash f***ing idea

Why?

Then that verification tag would be meaningless lmao