If people could hold their money more responsibly there wouldn’t be a need for that.
Why you d***sucking we all know he pays taxes but how are luxury goods and liquor improving the world? Not like he’s contributing to technology or is known for philanthropy. Your dumbass prolly thought Bezos was still the richest and this was a gotcha moment.
many artists wouldn't be who they are without liquor, hell people in general. It can allow for some great introspection which can then pour over into new ideas. I mean to be honest I don't care about who the richest person in the world is I have better things to do with my life than watch other people's wealth
That's true cost cutting would be rampant. Another problem I see is just a grey market of luxury goods forming if it was illegal to buy luxury items anymore and therefore raising the price of those luxury items on the grey market due to scarcity
Yea I’m pirating Gucci right now
Nah people would still find something else to spend their money on
True rich ppl would just buy up even more property than they do now considering in this hypothetical world there wouldn't be ultra expensive homes
I'll tell you what the world would be better off with Frank Ocean releasing music instead of that fart sniffer jewelry he's dropping
LMAO
If people could hold their money more responsibly there wouldn’t be a need for that.
broke niggas would still be insecure
broke niggas would still be insecure
Not at all. If they’re handling their money better it’s due to a clearer vision on long term goals which controls impulse buying on flashy, unimportant things.
many artists wouldn't be who they are without liquor, hell people in general. It can allow for some great introspection which can then pour over into new ideas. I mean to be honest I don't care about who the richest person in the world is I have better things to do with my life than watch other people's wealth
this is such a dumb worldview man the worlds richest 1% owns over TWICE the wealth as the bottom 90% of the population
how can you defend a handful of people accumulating an incredulous amount of wealth while millions of people have to starve it just doesnt make any sense
it would be lame, it wouldn't make people less materialistic it would force them to be. Huge difference when something isn't by choice. You're basically just screwing the people who care about that sort of thing for no societal gain
You're going to have some materialistic people in society and some who aren't, who cares? Society needs choice
this is such a dumb worldview man the worlds richest 1% owns over TWICE the wealth as the bottom 90% of the population
how can you defend a handful of people accumulating an incredulous amount of wealth while millions of people have to starve it just doesnt make any sense
people aren't starving because of other people's businesses being successful