you know vaccines dont grant immunity right Einstein?

strain dependent, and dependent on what kind of antibodies are activated when they attach to the attenuated virus. Generally speaking you will be "immune" to that strain for the duration that you have the antibodies to fight it off

you know what a third party Externality is right?

I’m not saying I won’t get the vaccine, I’m just saying there’s sus s*** that goes on with them, and vast majority of americans don’t trust the government. why would we trust them with vaccines?

yes and this seems like a net positive externality, no?

also yes vaccines are not a cure. they just give you a better chance of fighting off a disease, by putting trace amounts of the disease in you.

yes so you do understand that if majority people take the vaccine, and few outliers dont, then in turn the people who take the vaccine will be okay, and the ones who dont, while maybe not have the same protection, will in turn have a better protection because the people who did take it.

So if you take it, why are you worried about someone else decision?

(also keep in mind his main reasoning is because of a religious belief)

Brb gonna hire my russian hackers to vote for kanye

I live in Canada so maybe its a bit different because we live under socialized healthcare, I would also be very skeptical of the first generally available version of the vaccine. For me it would largely depend on who came up with it, because if it's china then I might wait a couple months and see how it goes down.

• also might be different in this situation because my province has less than 200 active cases right now

thankyou

he aint forcing it on all, he just said he wanted to implement it back into the schools.
The world is corrupted, why wouldn't you want to start from the ground up to try an get some stability...

Kid shootouts would be far less in a God fearing world

Mainly because when someone decides not to vaccinate they end up endangering those who do. An a***ogy one of my professors made, which I really like is that when a virus is active inside a person they essentially become an incubation tank. They get access to our genome and organelles and end up taking control of our DNA/RNA replicating machinery. This in turn increases the rate of mutation for the specific virus, which also increases the probability of a new strain emerging which could potentially infect those who already have antibodies for the previous strain

things like small pox and the bubonic plague are not going to mutate in modern day. Things like pnuemonia and the flue aren't death sentences either. You're not going to die or see some huge mutation because someone decides to not take a vaccine for whatever reason they believe.

And even at this, insulting someone because of their beliefs rather than educate them doesn't solve a problem.

So calling some "clinical" because they either are uneducated, or are exposed to different information, or even misinformed, doesnt help the problem at hand (if any); Just makes stagnates it.

go gobble up whatever the government tells you (track record for being S***TY) and take your vaccine

Your acting like people want to be more suscetible to transmitting a virus? NEWSFLASH :​ NOBODY DOES.

The disdain and trickery from the government and elites obviously eclipse that for some people. especially in affected communities. your suburban ass who just got a measles vaccine when your in school and lives happily, dont see the s*** others do.

"God fearing world".

Dude

Everyone has the freedom to feel and believe however they want, but implementing dogmatic religious content in education is mind control by an institution that takes control of people through fear and worshipping an entity based on believes.

Why not take the values and the good spiritual side that religion may have and seems to help some people, instead of just integrating it on children in the old controlled and stupid way.

Is there actual evidence people acted better towards each other when society was more religious/'godfearing'? i can't think of much so idk how true this would be

also in a sense when you have no religion in you're school you're not making one religion superior to another. i can imagine it being weird for a kid to have to pray daily in a religion that's not their own.

R u voting on Joe?

Yall would rather vote for 2 racists than for Kanye, thats crazy

This is why america went to s***

there's actually probably a way a tactful teacher can talk about faith, values and spirituality in a way that doesn't tie itself to one specific religion. that seems like it would be way more inclusive and therefore be able to actually reach out to more students

as everyone knows you can make people do s*** at school, but they can still ignore everything you said. so if you try to tie it to religion and stuff you could easily shut out a lot of kids who might find spirituality helpful

politicians have to be held to account, but it's a lot more complicated than individual parties. when you chose to vote for a candidate you're voting for way more than just the person themselves. in fact do you ever think that they want us to focus on the personalities to let the wider systems and factions go unaccountable beyond replacing the old guy with a new figurehead?

sometimes people have to vote for candidates they're uncomfortable with for other tactical/policy/party reasons. It doesn't mean they actually want to vote for the candidate

I would never let a racist rule my country.

you are one dumb s*** please stop posting

mandem wanting to vote kanye but don’t know ANY of his policies

sounds like privilege to me

Gun to my head I’d choose Ye over Biden or Trump 10/10 times I mean it

would you vote for any main party candidate?

biden is a horrible option, but at least you'll get a better supreme court pick under him which is a big deal with the way the us system is set up. i'm pretty sure he promised it will be an african woman too, which sounded like he was using identity politics to pander to me given how he announced it but i can almost guarantee she'll be more progressive than trump's pick. from his taste lately ye could legit pick someone more far-right than trump if he was president

all i meant tho was there's way more to consider than the personalities of the candidates. i respect the morals of not voting biden to not excuse him but i also get why some people will just to try to start slowly heading in the other direction on certain issues.