As long as the body of work is good, I don't really care about the project length.
So if someone gave you three tracks and they were the 2 min songs but they were really catchy and perfect you wouldn't care to want more.
10 tracks 22 minutes
So if someone gave you three tracks and they were the 2 min songs but they were really catchy and perfect you wouldn't care to want more.
Sure I'd want more, but all that matters is the quality. If that's their work ethic then who am I to question it.
As long as the body of work is good, I don't really care about the project length.
Ion think that’s possible
Depends on the artist but most of the time, yeah. You gotta be an artist capable of capturing the listener to justify making albums beyond that time limit.
As long as the body of work is good, I don't really care about the project length.
fr
daytona was 7/21
rodeo was 16/75
WLR was 24/63
and all are great projects
fr
daytona was 7/21
rodeo was 16/75
WLR was 24/63
and all are great projects
nice try sneaking wlr in there
the influence speaks for its amazing quality
Are u srs? It’s influenced because that’s what is getting played has nothing to do with quality
would say so yeah, something like that. Although nowadays I find myself more and more craving 20-30min albums. This depends on a lot of s*** obv... still can sit through 2h+ projects if the music justifies it ofc