I’m not saying the views are fake.Idk if you’re an artist or not but, you have a fire song with Drake:
1) Will you not Spend heavy money on the song to have huge numbers?
2) If you had multiple songs in the work you wouldn’t spend more time,Tactics,marketing whatever you call on the potential hit(song with Drake)?
3)Why keep repeating the same tactics?
a) it’ll raise suspicions
b) it’ll replace the Drake song
c) It’s expensive
F*** your argument this one is stronger “ Look outside the box, regardless of intent, the video is getting preferential treatment. It may boil down to the algorithm but no other video has the algorithm shove it down so many people’s throats, so repeatedly for so long. Yes other videos do get crazy exposure from the algorithm but again NONE even come close to this extent.”
I’m not saying the views are fake.Idk if you’re an artist or not but, you have a fire song with Drake:
1) Will you not Spend heavy money on the song to have huge numbers?
2) If you had multiple songs in the work you wouldn’t spend more time,Tactics,marketing whatever you call on the potential hit(song with Drake)?
3)Why keep repeating the same tactics?
a) it’ll raise suspicions
b) it’ll replace the Drake song
c) It’s expensive
But the “it’ll raise suspicions if they repeat it right now” is solid point
Look outside the box, regardless of intent, the video is getting preferential treatment. It may boil down to the algorithm but no other video has the algorithm shove it down so many people’s throats, so repeatedly for so long. Yes other videos do get crazy exposure from the algorithm but again NONE even come close to this extent.
That algorithm don't even help the rest of Future's music.
It's literally nothing that would make sense about specifically paying/pushing Life Is Good that was already a hit the second it dropped.
Future released like 5 flops after, and it woulda made sense to use money towards pushing those songs.
Why tf would you spend heavy money to make a Drake song a hit when his name ALONE already usually guarantees it to be huge?
Life Is Good debuted #2 in its first week and already was the highest charting song of Future career.
It would make more sense to spend huge money on a song WITHOUT Drake to guarantee that becomes a hit.
I don’t think you’re an artist so maybe that’s why you’re not getting the lingo.
I don’t think you’re an artist so maybe that’s why you’re not getting the lingo.
You: It makes sense to waste money promoting a guaranteed hit, rather than spend money promoting a song that actually needs push.
You: It makes sense to waste money promoting a guaranteed hit, rather than spend money promoting a song that actually needs push.
ummm yea
You: It makes sense to waste money promoting a guaranteed hit, rather than spend money promoting a song that actually needs push.
You: The single is already fire let me make a video for a less fire track
That algorithm don't even help the rest of Future's music.
It's literally nothing that would make sense about specifically paying/pushing Life Is Good that was already a hit the second it dropped.
Future released like 5 flops after, and it woulda made sense to use money towards pushing those songs.
You’re still focusing on the intent while not looking at what’s in front of your face. The video is getting preferential treatment, algorithm or not.
“This song slaps but not when it automatically plays after every rap song u play” one of many comments under the YouTube, everyone can see it, the videos getting more of a push then everything else out there
Get with Future’s label if you want a Diamond record
That marketing team he got A1 tbh
You’re still focusing on the intent while not looking at what’s in front of your face. The video is getting preferential treatment, algorithm or not.
“This song slaps but not when it automatically plays after every rap song u play” one of many comments under the YouTube, everyone can see it, the videos getting more of a push then everything else out there
Wtf do you think they would get out of pushing the song in March 2021 a year after its peaked
F*** your argument this one is stronger “ Look outside the box, regardless of intent, the video is getting preferential treatment. It may boil down to the algorithm but no other video has the algorithm shove it down so many people’s throats, so repeatedly for so long. Yes other videos do get crazy exposure from the algorithm but again NONE even come close to this extent.”
My point is, if I have a song with Drake and I want astronomical numbers, you best believe I will INVEST (not waste) money on marketing.
Wtf do you think they would get out of pushing the song in March 2021 a year after its peaked
Wait, are you trolling? I just addressed that for the 5th time and you keep ignoring what i say
Wtf do you think they would get out of pushing the song in March 2021 a year after its peaked
Who told you they payed now
In all seriousness, I don’t think you follow music that much or you’re one of the lucky ones. This been at it since it dropped
Future really gave drake his biggest song that’s crazy
And that was just a “warm up ting”
Wait, are you trolling? I just addressed that for the 5th time and you keep ignoring what i say
It's YouTube, there's plenty of scenarios that don't make sense.
Energy has more views than In My Feelings which was like 15x way bigger and hella viral.
The site is just a bunch of recommendation and autoplaying. For whatever reason LIG is getting huge recommending and autoplaying. You're looking into it for more than what it is. There's nothing to suggest it makes sense pushing that song in March 2021.