Reply
  • ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    no lol you need a movie you can get kids to go to with families not executing a falafel sales man , half baked war stories and calling superman a b**** to end the movie

    I didnt even see Gunn Superman so I dont know how many of the vibes I’m saying were in there

    But The idea that Superman can’t laser beam a violent criminal and it still be a “family movie” is everything wrong with Superman adaptations after 2000

    You gotta reinvent him to how he’d actually be in a post 9/11 and now post “2020’s” world. Niggas aint pulling out a knife and asking for purses no more they got switches now lmao let alone what f***ed up crazy s*** they would have in a DC fictional universe

    Its either he beam that nigga to bits or the old lady get switched down for her credit cards and some gum

  • YANDHI

    Bruh

    https://twitter.com/DCU_Direct/status/2120028800004039155

    no s*** but also there was no plan

  • ·
    1 reply
    user

    I didnt even see Gunn Superman so I dont know how many of the vibes I’m saying were in there

    But The idea that Superman can’t laser beam a violent criminal and it still be a “family movie” is everything wrong with Superman adaptations after 2000

    You gotta reinvent him to how he’d actually be in a post 9/11 and now post “2020’s” world. Niggas aint pulling out a knife and asking for purses no more they got switches now lmao let alone what f***ed up crazy s*** they would have in a DC fictional universe

    Its either he beam that nigga to bits or the old lady get switched down for her credit cards and some gum

    superman and heroes killing isnt mass marketable nor are there many storeis of people just trying to mass kill and he is put in situations like that.

    people got soft to him killing zod in man of steel but made excusees for him killing in superman 2025 or people killing in front of him

  • YANDHI

    Bruh

    https://twitter.com/DCU_Direct/status/2120028800004039155

    Lmao they said take your ambitions back to marvel

  • HaroldsChicken

    superman and heroes killing isnt mass marketable nor are there many storeis of people just trying to mass kill and he is put in situations like that.

    people got soft to him killing zod in man of steel but made excusees for him killing in superman 2025 or people killing in front of him

    The one mainline superhero who's looked badass killing was the dark Knight in Batman v superman

    Warehouse fight sequence

  • ·
    1 reply

    They're boutta do that new Wonder Woman actress how they did DCEU Supergirl

  • noisy

    They're boutta do that new Wonder Woman actress how they did DCEU Supergirl

    Gal Gadot is coming back

  • never in a million years gonna happen but please let him do a justice league film after MOT to wrap it up .

  • Zaslav f***ed them

  • OP
    ·
    2 replies

    IMO the biggest mistake they made was Supergirl. They needed a bonafide smash. Script and director had to be top notch. Or the movie should have been after 3-4 years.

  • PALESTINE DATTEN

    IMO the biggest mistake they made was Supergirl. They needed a bonafide smash. Script and director had to be top notch. Or the movie should have been after 3-4 years.

    absolutely

    it's easy to look back in hindsight but dcu felt like it died in the moment supergirl released

    very tragic

  • user

    You have to make it gritty without Nolan-izing it

    We need to see niggas sniffing cocaine and blood and pistol whipping in the Superman movie but he’s just unfazed and just shakes his head, chuckles and laser beam the f*** outta niggas after he asked nicely once

    Moral Homelander Who Doesn’t Take This S*** Serious until a real threat comes and knocks him on his ass

    #PutARealNiggaInThatSeat @​DCStudios

    You basically got that with Man of Steel and it still only did like 600 million

  • PALESTINE DATTEN

    IMO the biggest mistake they made was Supergirl. They needed a bonafide smash. Script and director had to be top notch. Or the movie should have been after 3-4 years.

    I mean they do those type of movies (Captain Marvel, Supergirl, etc.) out of spite to people saying misogynistic leaning things that overlap with the truth of a Supergirl film should never be within your first five films to establish a universe…and then low and behold those movies (maybe not the first Captain Marvel) kinda end up derailing the universe’s momentum

    Wish we could get the same stubborn determination to do a Cyborg or Mr Terrific show/movie

  • burymeinecko

    You basically got that with Man of Steel and it still only did like 600 million

    They have to do it with a post A24 post late 2010’s-early 2020’s cyberpunk lens, Man of Steel was cool but they almost have to do some s*** that is only vaguely linked to Superman by the fact that a nigga is flying around in the blue costume

    Futuristic Street level criminals and futuristic street level ethos with Kryptonite armor or some s***

  • The dc studios structure reporting directly to Zaslav was definitely the best part of it to avoid studio interference.

    Paramount wanting dc under its wing not gonna be a great idea especially with them needing money as quick as possible, doesnt look too promising

  • They want MCU level of success with out the MCU Patience

  • HaroldsChicken

    Sources point to several points of tension between DC’s Gunn and Safran and Skydance’s Greenstein and Goldberg. Before Skydance’s acquisition, Gunn and Safran reported directly to Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav; their contracts stipulated they would maintain that kind of direct reporting structure in the event of a change of leadership, in this case Ellison. That set up a chafing with Greenstein and Goldberg, who are trying to consolidate all production of motion pictures under them. Gunn and Safran, meanwhile, were accustomed to having strong control over every aspect of the rollout of DC products.

    “They had the final word on movies, TV shows, and animation,” says one insider. They were not about to get layered in the reporting structure, multiple sources add.

    Another tension point: sources say the DC heads were not forthcoming or were slow in sharing plans, slate details and footage with the Skydance movie heads. In the end, Greenstein and Goldberg prevailed and in the new hiring, Latcham will be reporting to them.

    Another insider is more blunt in the assessment. Ellison never wanted DC to report directly to him in the first place and did not have time for studio politics, such as any posturing between division heads.

    And then there was the matter of DC’s financials. The movies released were not great for business, while Supergirl was just a disaster, in the eyes of the new regime. Even Superman, which grossed $618 million worldwide and was profitable, did not net out, or have the kind of pop culture impact, in the way that kind of movie should have, the Skydance regime’s thinking went.

    Latcham’s rise to the top of DC Studios began 22 years ago, during a very different era for superhero movies. In 2004, Latcham was working as an assistant at Endeavor when Endeavor exec David Maisel left to lead Marvel Studios as president and hired him as his assistant at the upstart studio. Latcham is said have been surprised and underwhelmed when he showed up to Marvel’s modest Santa Monica Blvd. offices to discover it wasn’t yet a real a studio, but rather an outfit for giving script notes to Hollywood studios making licensed movies based on Marvel characters.

    “And then there was the matter of DC’s financials. The movies released were not great for business, while Supergirl was just a disaster, in the eyes of the new regime. Even Superman, which grossed $618 million worldwide and was profitable, did not net out, or have the kind of pop culture impact, in the way that kind of movie should have, the Skydance regime’s thinking went.”

    Knew it, not the kind of profit they were looking for from a movie about Superman, bvs all over again

  • BurgerBoi777

    “And then there was the matter of DC’s financials. The movies released were not great for business, while Supergirl was just a disaster, in the eyes of the new regime. Even Superman, which grossed $618 million worldwide and was profitable, did not net out, or have the kind of pop culture impact, in the way that kind of movie should have, the Skydance regime’s thinking went.”

    Knew it, not the kind of profit they were looking for from a movie about Superman, bvs all over again

    they need to realise superman is not that guy anymore, every film featuring him in the 21st century until the 2025 movie has been a disaster

    they need to build him back up and superman was a good start but they already f***ed it

  • Crazy how things would have been if they had just adapted Woman of Tomorrow right and not sent it to die in between Toy Story 5 and the most popular Spider-Man movie ever

  • I am scare what they going to do to John Stewart

  • relapsed bisexual

    they need to realise superman is not that guy anymore, every film featuring him in the 21st century until the 2025 movie has been a disaster

    they need to build him back up and superman was a good start but they already f***ed it

    Gonna be hard to see if man of tomorrow was progress or not cuz atp it’s gonna be dead on arrival like the flash/aquaman 2

  • Cop out ass IG post from Gunn.

    I guess it DO jam huh?

  • ATP the funniest thing would be if man of tomorrow ends up being an undisputed heater

  • they definitely wouldve had their job still if they never made supergirl

  • BurgerBoi777

    ATP the funniest thing would be if man of tomorrow ends up being an undisputed heater

    Man that would suck lmao