Ahhhhhh American corporatism American propaganda really made everyone think we weren’t at least sympathetic to some Nazi ideas and that they were truly evil reprehensible beings to us from the beginning

Likely not

Regardless of where you stand, we need to admit that this is troubling.

@salad fixed

Who are “you people”? Banks are not just any random private business. They are heavily intertwined in government and are a mandatory public necessity at least in our society.

The replies just get more and more cringe

Bro every overly performative black person writing think pieces about his maga hat era was bumping Donda

Yeah well they’re privately owned, and can legally do what they’re doing as enshrined by the infallible Supreme Court. So that’s a bit too bad.

The FDIC ruled that they cannot in many similar previous situations, so….

Sizz…

7:04

Okay so like I said this earlier Ye is probably doing this intentionally to make himself look more persecuted

It’s too late, I fear

They ain’t even really give af at all tbh that was geopolitics not morals.
Had NO problem whatsoever moving Nazi money or recruiting Nazi scientists postwar to fight the USSR and communism lol.

If thats the case thats f***ed

F***ing crazy man

love how Germany itself wasn’t an option

🤮

I said this like an hour ago and you got on my d*** accusing me of not reading the document

Took a look at it:

"Forceful prosecution of those who defraud American consumers is both responsible and admirable. However, Department of Justice initiatives to combat mass-market consumer fraud must be legitimate exercises of the Department's legal authorities, and must be executed in a manner that does not unfairly harm legitimate merchants and individuals. Operation Choke Point fails both these requirements. The Department's radical reinterpretation of what constitutes an actionable violation under § 951 of FIRREA fundamentally distorts Congress' intent in enacting the law, and inappropriately demands that bankers act as the moral arbiters and policemen of the commercial world."

Seems like it applies here.

curious as to how the fast the rate of US contribution belief changed in that 50 year span

"Ye didn’t get banned from the bank because of some Jewish conspiracy."

Okay, we're at least at the bare minimum.

"He got banned from the bank because of his recent ideology and statements."

We have literally no idea but for the sake of argument, let's assume this.

"Banks aren’t intended to be decision makers on ideology and personal beliefs when servicing clients."

Banks aren't intended to be a lot of things, obviously. But, regarding this-- since when? I never read this piece of legislation or body of work or terms and conditions from a banking institution in the US. This, in fact, goes for all private and public companies. Where does this intention lie in reality?

"It’s just wrong and has always been decided to be wrong by society in the past."

Okay, so what's the solution?

The solution is for the banks to follow FDIC rulings and regulations or actually get fined/de-insured.

It's not rocket science