https://www.ranker.com/list/why-people-hate-watchmen-movie/zack-howe
This summarizes well
“
Dr. Manhattan (Billy Crudup) is not viewed as a villain at the end of the comic book; in the movie, he is. That's a significant departure. Let's ignore for a moment that the giant squid - which in the original pages of Watchmen targets New York, courtesy of Adrian Veidt/Ozymandias (Matthew Goode) himself - is nowhere to be found in the film version. Making Dr. Manhattan the bogeyman may ultimately unite the world against a common enemy, but in the movie, the common enemy becomes the vigilantes/superheroes/what have you, instead of a giant squid. So, the question at that point becomes what will the lives of the main characters in the story look like going forward? Probably not good, but there's no way to know. What's more, this ending paints the governments involved as innocent bystanders rather than the ones truly at fault for a world in chaos.”
this is pointing out the differences between the film and book with the authors opinion on it.
this isnt showing me numbers of ppl who hated it or had issues with reflecting on the movies ending
this is pointing out the differences between the film and book with the authors opinion on it.
this isnt showing me numbers of ppl who hated it or had issues with reflecting on the movies ending
There is no way to show you exact numbers many of the book readers liked it overall at times but felt the ending ruined the point
There is no way to show you exact numbers many of the book readers liked it overall at times but felt the ending ruined the point
and many readers enjoyed the ending and thought it was a great take on a classic that worked well for the big screen.
and many readers enjoyed the ending and thought it was a great take on a classic that worked well for the big screen.
Good for them
https://www.ranker.com/list/why-people-hate-watchmen-movie/zack-howe
This summarizes well
“
Dr. Manhattan (Billy Crudup) is not viewed as a villain at the end of the comic book; in the movie, he is. That's a significant departure. Let's ignore for a moment that the giant squid - which in the original pages of Watchmen targets New York, courtesy of Adrian Veidt/Ozymandias (Matthew Goode) himself - is nowhere to be found in the film version. Making Dr. Manhattan the bogeyman may ultimately unite the world against a common enemy, but in the movie, the common enemy becomes the vigilantes/superheroes/what have you, instead of a giant squid. So, the question at that point becomes what will the lives of the main characters in the story look like going forward? Probably not good, but there's no way to know. What's more, this ending paints the governments involved as innocent bystanders rather than the ones truly at fault for a world in chaos.”
watchmen movie was a commentary on superhero genre makes sense to make them the enemy superheroes would never work in real life idk movie ending was fire to me
watchmen movie was a commentary on superhero genre makes sense to make them the enemy superheroes would never work in real life idk movie ending was fire to me
They were already the enemy
“ who watches the watchmen “
They were already the enemy
“ who watches the watchmen “
it has to make the audience hate the superheroes too tho
it has to make the audience hate the superheroes too tho
Man of steel is the same ending
Not even Batman killing so much as guns make it too easy . Hands is like at least he has to do it and physically see his kills is Martha moment . No one thinks he is good. We know heroes aren’t clean . Batman out here doing drone strikes
This isn’t Alan Moore in movie form that he thinks it is .
If Snyder vision was to be Alan moore in hero form Snyder Cut plot wouldn’t be what it is. Luthor already ozymandidas we know down to identifying the bullet
We know
Bvs is a poor man watchmen in many ways
Man of steel is the same ending
Movie ends and sequel opens with Superman blowing up a drone.
Witness "who does superman answer to "
Astrophysicist "why is he here"
And then Martha Kent gives him a great set up.
Clark: says nothing
Movie ends and sequel opens with Superman blowing up a drone.
Witness "who does superman answer to "
Astrophysicist "why is he here"
And then Martha Kent gives him a great set up.
Clark: says nothing
Like he really copy pasted watchmens theme , story characters onto these characters and mashed it with visual moments from the comics . Lex is ozymandidas .
I’m curious to peep the whedon cut just to make sure it’s as terrible as everyone says it is but I don’t have the heart
Watch the Youtube side by side video
joss whedon somebody i would actually throw my food at if i seen him on tbe street f*** that dude
pale and angular with bags under his eyes, he no longer resembled the plump cheeck puck who once implishly urged a profile writer to describe him as "doughy" and "jowly".
pale and angular with bags under his eyes, he no longer resembled the plump cheeck puck who once implishly urged a profile writer to describe him as "doughy" and "jowly".
Bro the person who did the piece was sucking up to him so hard.
This twitter thread has the whole article
Nah not the film section being VERY QUIET about this damming SUPER RACIST article about joss.
Dudes so racist it's insane
This twitter thread has the whole article
Nah not the film section being VERY QUIET about this damming SUPER RACIST article about joss.
Dudes so racist it's insane
What we supposed to do bro we read it . There are only so many times we can acknowledge whedon a piece of s***